Fine then I put Zac Taylor above both of them and he can take Ganz's spot
This is what I think. TMart came within a whisker of a Big 12 title and got us to one B1G title game. Of course, his dumb *** interception into the end zone probably cost us that Big 12 title game too. Armstrong? Nada
TMart was never the same after his injury in the Missouri game. Defenses were figuring out how to contain him prior to that, but he was still an explosive running threat which the injury pretty much took away. So, my vote is TMart before the injury, your sister's position afterward.
He was still pretty decent after he recovered from the injury. He ripped off two long distance runs against MSU in 2012 I think that won us that game. And that is why I think he was better than Armstrong. He had a homerun ability with his legs due to his sheer speed and burst that Armstrong lacked. Armstrong had more shake and bake, but he had very few truly long distance runs
I agree. By a hair. And only because, in my view, of his better big play production
I have always said I think TA would have been truly special in an Osborne option offense. He isn't as fast as TM was pre-injury, but he's instinctive as a runner and I thought he saw the option well when they used to run it. Particularly when he should keep and cut up field.
It actually went after Tagge. Dave Humm, Vince the Prince, then Tom Sorely, then Turner Gill, Steve Taylor, Frankie London, Mike Grant who was removed by Tommie Frazier. You know the rest
I would have to agree with your sister . I think TM woulda coulda shoulda, but he never recovered from that injury I believe it was in his sophomore year. Both had a hard time breaking bad throwing form and habits. Tommy ended on a frustrating injury career as well.
TMart was also part of some epic comebacks. Wisconsin and Ohio State come to mind. He was a highly competitive QB too. He also often played through injury. He was every bit as tough and competitive as TA
London ultimately did nothing other than hold.
