Toggle sidebar

Who would you rather have Stansbury or Gottfried?

Status
Not open for further replies.
dawgstudent

dawgstudent

Heisman
Apr 15, 2003
39,308
18,571
113
You never did say you would take Stansbury over Gottfried. If I had to pick between the two, I go with Stansbury all day long.
 
DawgatAuburn

DawgatAuburn

All-Conference
Apr 25, 2006
10,978
1,745
113
He's definitely dumb, but not because he asked this question, and is likely one of 23 people who have voted for Stans.

Is there a way for us to see who has voted DS? Or is a number all we get?
 
C

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
between coaches for rivals on one team's message board...who in the hell does he think everybody is going to choose? Ask it on the Kentucky or Tennessee message board to get some real results
 
M

MM4MSU

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
113
0
16
While Rick may not be a Coack K (yet), he has developed into a very solid coach in most areas. Too bad most of you don't have access to Tider Insider, as I do (well, I live in AL, so have to spy on them, plus a lot of solid info). As I was listening to Jack boradcast game over M2M last evening I kept almost constant scroll of TI. Those Bama fans are totally fed up with Got-fried and are almost all clamoring for his demise at end of year. Incidently, they HATE MSU basketball, and especially Rick on that board (Example: "Well, looks like $tansfield bought another pretty good team at M$U"). A friend told me I would learn to loath UAT as much as OM after living here for awhile, and that is correct. We don't need Got-Fried (or anything else uat). We have the coach we need.

Michael M
(MSU '73)
 
P

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
55,988
24,983
113
then by all means you should take that question to their boards and poll them.
 
P

PosterFormerlyKnownAsRFAA

Redshirt
Nov 16, 2005
812
0
0
large degree than Gottfried would get at least 15-20% of the votes.

I mean, if you posted a "Croom or Nutt" poll here a few montsh ago I would imagine Nutt getting well more than 20% of the votes, rivals be damned.
 
C

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
certainly wasnt me...i've repeated over and over they are very equal with pretty much 1 difference
 
FQDawg

FQDawg

Senior
May 1, 2006
3,076
618
113
I put it on a Tulane board... While it's not as busy as an SEC board, I figured it would give us some unbiased answers, especially since I kept the names off the accomplishments....

If you are interested, you can see any results here.
 
B

bonedaddy401

Redshirt
Aug 3, 2012
4,663
22
38
That means Coach34 and some other idot.

And coach, Yes I expected Stans to win because this is a State board but as you can see it is a beyond bias majority of people that disagree with you.......again.
 
C

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
i'd like to see that put on Tenn, Kentucky's, or Fla's board without the names and see what the outcome is.
 
FQDawg

FQDawg

Senior
May 1, 2006
3,076
618
113
i've repeated over and over they are very equal with pretty much 1 difference
Click to expand...

Actually, there are quite a few differences when looking at the last 10 years since both have been a head coach in the SEC...

Stans has a:
Better overall record
Better conference record
More division titles, which you may put down but I'll take any day of the week
More conference tournament titles
Better head-to-head record

Gottfried has:
Better record in NCAAs (5-5 compared to Stansbury's 4-5)
A trip past the second round
 
P

PosterFormerlyKnownAsRFAA

Redshirt
Nov 16, 2005
812
0
0
But what if A can only recruit ACT 23 or higher? What if A's teams have to practice outdoors with nerf balls? What if A has no gym and plays every game on the road? OK, that's all exaggerated, but the point is, you haven't revealed what other factors might demonstrate that one would be expected to be much more capable when given the advantages I am about to offer. If B's program spends $25 million a year, whereas A compiled a very similar result on $1 million a year, I would opt for the better monetary value.

Do we want to start applying the "x-factors" to the equation?
 
C

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
"but as you can see it is a beyond bias majority of people that disagree with you.......again."

The majority disagreed with me that we would not make the Sweet 16 in 2003
The majority disagreed with me that we would not make the Sweet 16 in 2004
The majority disagreed with me that we would start 1-8 in the SEC in 2005
The majority disagreed with me that we wouldnt make the NCAA's in 2006
The majority disagreed with me that we should have run the Spread in 2004-2006
The majority disagreed that Crooms would never have an offense worth a **** no matter how long he recruited
The majority disagreed that we would fire Crooms in 2008
The majority disagreed that EJ was a better DC than Cheese would be

The majority doesnt always determine that something is or isnt correct
 
C

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
"<font size="2">Well, I'd go with Rick Stansbury because he's proven he can take his team deep into the NCAAs"</font>
 
dawgstudent

dawgstudent

Heisman
Apr 15, 2003
39,308
18,571
113
the fact that everyone is voting for Stansbury and you take that one line and <span style="font-style: italic;">obviously</span> it proves your point is quite funny.
 
DawgatAuburn

DawgatAuburn

All-Conference
Apr 25, 2006
10,978
1,745
113
He got to choose his preferred method of polling and is getting torched, so now all of THOSE people are stupid too. You back up faster than a crawdad Coach.

Someone go post it on NAFOOM and/or Spirit. That may be Coach's only prayer.
 
C

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
have been posted the way FrenchQuarterDawg did it...while only two votes- it is 1-1...take away the names, and tons more people would vote for Gottfried...he's loses votes for being a douchebag
 
T

TheHorrorTheHorror

Redshirt
Dec 2, 2008
402
0
0
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%" border="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td style="PADDING-RIGHT: 6px; PADDING-LEFT: 6px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 6px; PADDING-TOP: 6px" valign="top"><font size="2">Re: POLL: Stansbury vs Gottfried.</font></td> <td class="" style="PADDING-RIGHT: 6px; PADDING-LEFT: 6px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 6px; PADDING-TOP: 6px" valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" align="right"><font face="verdana" size="1"><a><font face="verdana" color="#3A379B" size="2">Reply</font></a></font></td> </tr> </tbody> </table> _________________________________________________ <font size="2">Is there seriously a question? Gottfried is one of the worst coaches in Division I. Very good recruiter...but a poor, poor bench coach and motivator. Every single year it seems I watch Alabama and wonder why they aren't a better team with the talent they have.

Stansbury in a walk. Besides, he's a Kentucky boy.</font>

<font size="2">This post was edited on 1/15 1:39 PM by dreadpirate

</font><font size="1">Posted on 1/15 1:38 PM | IP: Logged</font>
</p>
 
M

MSUCostanza

Redshirt
Jan 10, 2007
5,706
0
0
is that it's Stansbury's fault we had to play them in the 2nd round.

My response is - Memphis annhilated every other team in the tournament except us, and the team that finally got them, Kansas. That was anyone's game with 5 minutes left. I imagine Michigan State would have taken that result over what happened to them, being down 30 in the first half.

How is that not a credit to Stansbury for having us ready to play and competing to the final minutes with a team that was barely challenged all season? Only Coach can find a way to rip Stansbury for it.
 
M

MSUCostanza

Redshirt
Jan 10, 2007
5,706
0
0
What's your excuse for this answer?

Face it, you and the Gottfried family are about the only ones who would choose him over Stansbury.
 
P

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
55,988
24,983
113
MSUCostanza said:
Face it, you and the Gottfried family are about the only ones who would choose him over Stansbury.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't be surprised if some of them would choose Stans too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom