Why compare KA to RS? We are playing better with KA involved

Thick

Redshirt
Dec 29, 2008
1,505
0
0
as a sixth man. Randy plays really good perimeter d, makes ft's (lately), and hits a few 3's per game. The upside to KA is he can finish inside, Randy cannot, Randy plays really good d, KA does not, KA is a big that can clear out the inside for JV with his perimeter shooting, so both players bring much needed pluses to the team. But neither disqualify one another, the team needs both of them to contribute period. I would really like to see more PT in the lineup with Bost and KA, because PT can shoot, really jump, and he attacks the rim when he wants and finishes strong. Big game today.</p>
 

Agentdog

Redshirt
Aug 16, 2006
1,433
0
0
I agree. BS and PT need to be starting. The Defense for BS like you said. PT is such a good athlete, rebounds, hustles, and can shoot. He needs to play alot. Also, like you, I like the dimension KA brings inside with his size and talent. He can shoot the 3 or drive to the rim and rebound.

Where Stans needs to find KA minutes is from RJ and the rest of the bench. If RJ is shooting well, leave him in. If RJ isn't shooting well, take him out as that is the only thing RJ brings to this team at the moment. Bring in KA as the 6th man, he can shoot the 3, rebound, and play just as good of defense as RJ and anyone else coming off the bench. .