1) The infamous "eye" test of bubble teams with 20+ wins<div>Many eyes on our games early in the year against AZ and WV, against Baylor and Kentucky. Bost and Moultrie pass the test talent wise, which believe it or not counts for more than you think.</div><div>
</div><div>2) The wins against SC and Ark even though they aren't good teams, meant a lot</div><div>We were being watched there and that really did answer the question after the 5 game loss.</div><div>
</div><div>3) Tournament games don't mean much at all to the committee unless a lower level team wins the whole tournament</div><div>So if Ole Miss or Georgia wins the SECT, its anybody's guess</div><div>
</div><div>4) RPI while important is not a huge factor - eye test beats RPI</div><div>
</div><div>5) None of our key starters are hurt and out</div><div>This would put us out if Bost, Moultrie or possibly Hood were hurt and out</div><div>
</div><div>P.S. The more we are shown on Lunardi's "First Four Out" it gets our name out there and is great for visibility for recruits in the next 3-4 years.</div><div>
</div><div>My opinion only.</div>
</div><div>2) The wins against SC and Ark even though they aren't good teams, meant a lot</div><div>We were being watched there and that really did answer the question after the 5 game loss.</div><div>
</div><div>3) Tournament games don't mean much at all to the committee unless a lower level team wins the whole tournament</div><div>So if Ole Miss or Georgia wins the SECT, its anybody's guess</div><div>
</div><div>4) RPI while important is not a huge factor - eye test beats RPI</div><div>
</div><div>5) None of our key starters are hurt and out</div><div>This would put us out if Bost, Moultrie or possibly Hood were hurt and out</div><div>
</div><div>P.S. The more we are shown on Lunardi's "First Four Out" it gets our name out there and is great for visibility for recruits in the next 3-4 years.</div><div>
</div><div>My opinion only.</div>