Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="eerdoc" data-source="post: 129431145" data-attributes="member: 1071764"><p>I see your assessment way off mark. &quot;Our QB development&nbsp; is stagnant at best, which has forced us into being a predominantly running team.&quot; Really? Do you not factor in that we lost TWO NFL WRs from last year's team? They were a lot of the passing production? We have THREE true freshmen, a transfer, a RS-SO, who had no experience, and two hold overs as our receiving corps. Should be thankful Dana has assembled a good group at RB and has developed a decent line until we mature a little more at the receiving positions. IMO, far too quick to render a decoration based on single dimensional thinking which does not really hold water. I, too, would welcome someone who can take some pressure off Dana, but I have NO INTEREST in having an OC who desires to install and run HIS offense. This is Dana's team and he WILL continue to make the offensive decisions--as it well should be.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="eerdoc, post: 129431145, member: 1071764"] I see your assessment way off mark. "Our QB development is stagnant at best, which has forced us into being a predominantly running team." Really? Do you not factor in that we lost TWO NFL WRs from last year's team? They were a lot of the passing production? We have THREE true freshmen, a transfer, a RS-SO, who had no experience, and two hold overs as our receiving corps. Should be thankful Dana has assembled a good group at RB and has developed a decent line until we mature a little more at the receiving positions. IMO, far too quick to render a decoration based on single dimensional thinking which does not really hold water. I, too, would welcome someone who can take some pressure off Dana, but I have NO INTEREST in having an OC who desires to install and run HIS offense. This is Dana's team and he WILL continue to make the offensive decisions--as it well should be. [/QUOTE]

Name