Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="WVU-SE" data-source="post: 132419080" data-attributes="member: 1374453">CFB and sports in general are at a crossroads.&nbsp; With NIL money, the portal, etc. and the NCAA having no balls to act on any of it, things are going to change IMO.The only thing that makes sense is the power 5 (or whatever the new name will be called) teams to break away and set their own set of rules.&nbsp; I can see a EPL type system where the bottom 4 teams in each pod get regulated and the top teams from the lower conference join in.&nbsp; The CFP system is closest to the EPL system than any other sports league with the &quot;rich get richer&quot; and unbalanced spending an revenue streams.&nbsp; Why not follow the model to a degree.&nbsp; It's a working model and very popular.I don't see it as the NFL lite at all.&nbsp; That is a socialist model which works amazing from a competitive aspect.&nbsp; NCAA football is the furthest from that as the top 5-10 programs have far more $$$ and weight than the other 60 or so teams.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="WVU-SE, post: 132419080, member: 1374453"] CFB and sports in general are at a crossroads. With NIL money, the portal, etc. and the NCAA having no balls to act on any of it, things are going to change IMO. The only thing that makes sense is the power 5 (or whatever the new name will be called) teams to break away and set their own set of rules. I can see a EPL type system where the bottom 4 teams in each pod get regulated and the top teams from the lower conference join in. The CFP system is closest to the EPL system than any other sports league with the "rich get richer" and unbalanced spending an revenue streams. Why not follow the model to a degree. It's a working model and very popular. I don't see it as the NFL lite at all. That is a socialist model which works amazing from a competitive aspect. NCAA football is the furthest from that as the top 5-10 programs have far more $$$ and weight than the other 60 or so teams. [/QUOTE]

Name