I am trying to be as objective as I can about my comparison of Zable and Williams.
Parking, LU, I give a B+, W&M I give. D+.
Traffic was about a wash. No real problems for me Saturday.
Quality of concessions, I'll give the nod to W&M on quality, B- to C. But as far as staffing of concessions I give both a C-. Plenty friendly, just not enough lines or concessions open.
Bathrooms, W&M a C, LU B+. And the fact that they do not have bathrooms on the upper concourse area was really a major oversight.
Ease of access to seating, ok at both places. I was disappointed that they didn't open the upper deck on the home side, but it really wasn't needed.
Mike, I'll ask your opinion on the handicap accessibility. I know, because you told me, but I think it's worth you telling of your experience.
I don't particularly like the track around the field. I think it detracted from the football atmosphere.
The smaller venue let the crowds be a little more affective, with respect to crowd noise.
The PA system and announcer was spot on at W&M, except that he didn't do his homework on name pronunciation.
I can't say anything about the playing surface, although I tend to think they were equal, and both are very good.
I guess one of the biggest things that stood out to me was how underwhelmed I was. I figured with the highly touted and much advertised, multi-million dollar upgrades, I expected more.
All things considered, I enjoyed LU better. It could be that I've been to LU a half dozen times, so there is a familiarity that makes me feel more comfortable. This was my first ever trip to Zable. But, unless the VHSL calls me up and ask me to pick, I guess we will all be going to W&M for a few more years.