msudawg12 said:
In the past 7 years or so there's been Federer and Nadal just like Phil and Tiger. That is the matchup we want to see. That is the matchup that has had tennis getting the best ratings its had since Sampras Agassi.
But, should he have played? Obviously not. If Nadal is willing to not play at a major, notably Wimbledon after last year, then he's damn serious about the fact that he shouldnt be playing
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tbody> <tr align="left"> <td width="39">
Year</td> <td width="134">
Champion</td> <td width="38">
Seed</td> <td width="137">
Runner-up</td> <td width="40">
Seed</td> <td width="181">
Score</td> <td width="32">
Mins</td> </tr> <tr align="left"> <td>2008</td> <td>R. Nadal (ESP)</td> <td>2</td> <td>R. Federer (SUI)</td> <td>1</td> <td>6-4, 6-4, 6-7 (5-7), 6-7 (8-10), 9-7</td> <td>288</td> </tr> <tr align="left"> <td width="39">2007</td> <td width="134">R. Federer (SUI)</td> <td width="38">1</td> <td width="137">R. Nadal (ESP)</td> <td width="40">2</td> <td width="181">7-6 (9-7), 4-6, 7-6 (7-3), 2-6, 6-2</td> <td width="32">225</td> </tr> <tr align="left"> <td width="39">2006</td> <td width="134">R. Federer (SUI)</td> <td width="38">1</td> <td width="137">R. Nadal (ESP)</td> <td width="40">2</td> <td width="181">6-0, 7-6 (7-5), 6-7 (2-7), 6-3</td> <td width="32">170</td> </tr> <tr align="left"> <td width="39">2005</td> <td width="134">R. Federer (SUI)</td> <td width="38">1</td> <td width="137">A. Roddick (USA)</td> <td width="40">2</td> <td width="181">6-2, 7-6 (7-2), 6-4</td> <td width="32">101</td> </tr> <tr align="left"> <td width="39">2004</td> <td width="134">R. Federer (SUI)</td> <td width="38">1</td> <td width="137">A. Roddick (USA)</td> <td width="40">2</td> <td width="181">4-6, 7-5, 7-6 (7-3), 6-4</td> <td width="32">151</td> </tr> <tr align="left"> <td width="39">2003</td> <td width="134">R. Federer (SUI)</td> <td width="38">4</td> <td width="137">M. Philippousis (AUS)</td> <td width="40">U</td> <td width="181">7-6 (7-5), 6-2, 7-6 (7-3)</td> <td width="32">119</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>