With The Schedule We've Played, We Should Be 3-0 Right Now
- Thread starter ExtremeDog
- Start date
karlchilders said:
So, let me get this straight...
We can talk about Ralph and his shortcomings, talk about how he can't beat top 10 ranked teams as QB of our team, and discuss how his back-up needs to play all during our 6 game win streak- that includes wins over Fla and Georgia...nobody says anything remotely close to this
BUT
let us mention one little thing about players leaving our basketball team constantly because of Stansbury and making it harder on us to beat **** teams, and I get:
SCREW you and all Dumbasses Like YOU.....
seriously????
I bet you are a deacon in the Baptist church that does shots with the guys on business trips but never drinks at home too huh Karl?
I think Relf is who we should play...period! Not sure where you'r comming from with that.
But, when you talk about baskeball, you go completely stupid!
But, when you talk about baskeball, you go completely stupid!
you agree Ralph should be the QB- but you never call any of those people saying Russell needs to play or start a dumbass or tell them to "wait till we lose"...but one word about Stansbury and you are going nuts with rage....
"But, when you talk about baskeball, you go completely stupid!"
Which part was that? The part about us not having much depth because of transfers? Or the part about having Romero and Phil helping us be a better team right now?
Enlighten me to how one of those statements was stupid?
"But, when you talk about baskeball, you go completely stupid!"
Which part was that? The part about us not having much depth because of transfers? Or the part about having Romero and Phil helping us be a better team right now?
Enlighten me to how one of those statements was stupid?
Eight guys played 15 or more minutes tonight for us tonight and we played 9 guys. Detroit used only 7 players and their 6th and 7th guy only got 13 and 9 minutes respectively.
That's with our two best players out and two other guys we probably expected to be playing big roles if not starting by now when we recruited them that can't even get on the floor b/c of lingering injuries (Smith and Riek) If those two were healthy and as good as we thought they were in high school we'd be more than fine.
So, I don't know if you're saying that we lack a lot of "good" players right now or what, but having 8-9 guys that you can count on for quality minutes isn't terrible.</p>
That's with our two best players out and two other guys we probably expected to be playing big roles if not starting by now when we recruited them that can't even get on the floor b/c of lingering injuries (Smith and Riek) If those two were healthy and as good as we thought they were in high school we'd be more than fine.
So, I don't know if you're saying that we lack a lot of "good" players right now or what, but having 8-9 guys that you can count on for quality minutes isn't terrible.</p>