Matt was making the point that both MSU and OM have to look at
the outcome of their games in a similar fashion, if not the same way.
MSU cannot afford to look at the Troy game and say "well we won and that's all that matters". He said so from the perspective of a former player who was telling the frat boy that coaches n the MSU locker room will be pointing out te negatives as important means learning from the game.
OM cannot afford to only look at the final score either. They must take some positives and build on them as State had to do in 2009.
Richard apparantly took this as condescending (and got excited) and portray Matt's argument in the light that he was saying OM fans can take nothing good from the game, and that Matt was arguing in circles.
He wasnt. Then the stupid little prick took it a step further. When Matt called him out and asked him to point to one comment that he made that indicated he thought OM shouldnt take any positives away, Richard couldnt. He just responded to Matt getting upset by saying "feel better?" As if he hadnt started it.
Richard, I know you read this board. Remember a few things dumbass. First, to make a counterpoint, you have to understand the original point that was made by simply listening. 2nd, if you lose your cool first, you still lost your cool. Pointing out the other guy is raising his voice is gradeschool.
Finally, I know it chaps your pampered *** that MSU fans are the ones being snarky to you because, quite frankly, they can. But you made that bed brother. Take your medicine and shut up. You might just hear enough to understand next time before you open your mouth.