Wow, UK only favored by 7 1/2 over Southern Miss (posted on KSR).

Grumpyolddawg

Heisman
Jun 11, 2001
28,412
37,172
113
Your comment is nothing but wishful thinking. As good as Boom may be he is not what Bama looks for in a RB. They could use him as a change of pace RB but he will never wear down defenses like Derrick Henry or Mark Ingram. Sorry, Boom would not start at Bama.

Really good chance Harris isn't either and may never, from what most Bama fans are feeling it will be Scarbourgh, I think that's the name. Plus they have the top back in the 17 class committed, who is about 6'2" 225 as a rising HS sr, the back Bama always looks for. Now it will be tough for them to hang on to him until signing day because he is from Cali. But Henry gaining 2200+ yards didn't hurt their chances of keeping him
 
Nov 29, 2015
1,735
627
0
Really good chance Harris isn't either and may never, from what most Bama fans are feeling it will be Scarbourgh, I think that's the name. Plus they have the top back in the 17 class committed, who is about 6'2" 225 as a rising HS sr, the back Bama always looks for. Now it will be tough for them to hang on to him until signing day because he is from Cali. But Henry gaining 2200+ yards didn't hurt their chances of keeping him
Nothing will warm my heart more than Damien Harris wasting away a chance of being a starter to being someone who was never a rotational back. It might be best served he transfers somewhere and takes a year to work on his body. But if he stays I'll be so damn happy if he doesn't play rotational snaps. Eff Harris
 

uofkFTW18

Heisman
Jul 26, 2012
25,528
12,637
96
We are going to have to play lights out to win this game. Southern Miss has too much experienced talent for even Dawson to screw this game up.

If we start out slowly at all on offense, then there is a serious chance we lose this one.

This is a terrible bit of scheduling on our part. Making a team this talented our opening game puts our coaches in a tough spot.
IIRC Southern Miss was put in as a replacement for UAB when their program disbanded. UK was struggling to find a team to fill the spot and I believe Southern Miss ended up being our only option. Not a whole lot we could have done in this situation, unfortunately.
 

sluggercatfan

Heisman
Aug 17, 2004
35,953
29,631
0
We are going to have to play lights out to win this game. Southern Miss has too much experienced talent for even Dawson to screw this game up.

If we start out slowly at all on offense, then there is a serious chance we lose this one.

This is a terrible bit of scheduling on our part. Making a team this talented our opening game puts our coaches in a tough spot.
Unllike UK they scored a ton of points last year...if we don't reach 35+ we will not win, but with SM having a new staff and UK having virtually a new one, this should be quite interesting with SM very possibly having the upper hand with a talented qb to run their offense while I'm sure the UK staff has no idea what they will get from DB...they lost to wku 45-28 in the conf USA championship game and then to Washington 44-31 in bowl game...going to be very interesting how MS plays this for sure being as defensive minded as he is and his penchant for the running game.
 

BigBlueTuckian

Sophomore
Jan 9, 2016
309
198
0
Really good chance Harris isn't either and may never, from what most Bama fans are feeling it will be Scarbourgh, I think that's the name. Plus they have the top back in the 17 class committed, who is about 6'2" 225 as a rising HS sr, the back Bama always looks for. Now it will be tough for them to hang on to him until signing day because he is from Cali. But Henry gaining 2200+ yards didn't hurt their chances of keeping him

The argument was whether or not Boom would start at Bama, not whether Harris will be their starter.

That being said, my gut feeling is Scarborough starts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jauk11

vhcat70

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
57,418
38,482
0
Right. Got it. Everyone else here is dense but you. Nobody besides you can comprehend. You are the only really smart guy. That's the theme of so many of your posts. But then, there are these inconvenient numbers. You have made 17,373 posts. You have received 390 likes. You probably have the lowest ratio of likes on the entire board. Oops. Now, that's really ugly. So maybe you are actually the dense party, maybe even too dense to see it.
More of your same insecurity problem since you can't refute the facts of my posts. Go for it if that makes you feel better.
 

Blue Decade

All-American
May 3, 2013
10,266
6,034
0
Okay, I will try for the 3rd time to explain this again. Like I said before, I am making a case for people to judge Stoops in 2017, when his 2014 recruits will be juniors and seniors. In basketball, lots of players stand out as freshmen. But in SEC football, most players don't make their most important contributions until they are juniors and seniors. You cannot judge SEC football players as freshmen and sophomores. You should not judge a Kentucky football coach who is recruiting better than any of his predecessors until he has had enough time to develop his players into juniors and seniors. Many Kentucky football fans wanted to run off Rich Brooks in 2005. Then from 2006-10, Kentucky went to 5 straight bowls. More people should have learned something from that, but impatience is not a rational emotion.
I hate to break it to you. But this team is pretty much all stoops players. Can't blame joker. Can't blame anyone else at all anymore. The 2016 season is our make or break year. Wanna know why? Because after going 5-7 in the 2014 season, before the 2015 season. Coach stoops promised major improvement from the season before where we went 5-7. He said there will be a much improved product on the field before the 2015 season and to fill up the stadium for an excited and groundbreaking season. What actually happened? We played a MUCH easier schedule. Finish with the same record? We REGRESSED in 2015. Now you're telling me. He gets a pass the 2016 season? When he practically promised a groundbreaking bowl season last season? The 2015 season. And then if we suck this year it doesn't count it counts the 2017 season. I feel like I hear this every season. This season doesn't count towards stoops. Next does. This is YEAR FOUR.

This season. IS ALL ON STOOPS. If we crap the bed, he'll still be here because of the buyout money. Doesn't mean we shouldn't give up if we crap the bed again this season after last seasons despicable in game coaching, every single game. If you didn't see how terrible the coaching was last season. And how unprepared our team looked last season. And how we didn't make one IN GAME ADJUSTMENT ALL SEASON. Then I don't know what to tell you. It was bad. But if it REPEATS THIS SEASON. Then stoops needs to go. There's no more excuses. None. I've never seen such terrible in game coaching my entire life. Can't repeat that again this season. And if it does. As I said. Only the most hardcore stoops apologists will remain
I can see that it will not be possible to explain indisputable facts about our roster to your satisfaction. But that's okay. In 2015, we had a predominantly freshman-sophomore team. Last September, 6 sophomores and 2 true freshmen started on our offense. Later in the season, a redshirt freshman won the starting quarterback job. By last November, 4 freshmen including 2 true freshmen were starting on our defense. Our placekicker was a sophomore. Based on the blue white game, our projected 2016 starters will be 3 seniors, 11 juniors, and 7 sophomores. Our punter will be a freshman. Our senior left tackle Mosier is a former walk on who will be in extreme danger of being beaten out by a true freshman in August. By objective standards, this is a young team. Our 2016 roster will have only 9 seniors on scholarship, and 1 of them is a former walk on. I'm sure Stoops will be the 1st to agree with you that everything is his responsibility. He has said that before. I'm only suggesting, as I have already suggested several times here, that Stoops should not be judged in terms of his future at Kentucky until the 2017 season is finished. If you want to judge him now, then judge him. But Stoops isn't going anywhere, and it's virtually inevitable that his players will play better as juniors and seniors.
 

hmt5000

Heisman
Aug 29, 2009
26,976
82,650
0
Unllike UK they scored a ton of points last year...if we don't reach 35+ we will not win, but with SM having a new staff and UK having virtually a new one, this should be quite interesting with SM very possibly having the upper hand with a talented qb to run their offense while I'm sure the UK staff has no idea what they will get from DB...they lost to wku 45-28 in the conf USA championship game and then to Washington 44-31 in bowl game...going to be very interesting how MS plays this for sure being as defensive minded as he is and his penchant for the running game.
They scored 45 against Charlotte and we scored 52. They did most of their damage against bad teams... 1 win against top 60. I'm not saying they aren't good but if we play their schedule I think we have at least as good of record and score as many, or more, points.

Wku manhandled them. Not saying we beat wku last year but they don't match up physically with us. If ware, bonner, and Allen can provide heat I just don't see them scoring 30+ on us.

I'm more worried about vandy and missou as winnable games. Those 2 teams are a good qb away from being pretty good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jauk11

Blue Decade

All-American
May 3, 2013
10,266
6,034
0
More of your same insecurity problem since you can't refute the facts of my posts. Go for it if that makes you feel better.
Most of your posts are nonsubstantive. Subjective opinions are nonsubstantive. Insults are also nonsubstantive. So there isn't very much to refute. In the past, I have sometimes agreed with your posts, but you do not remember that because you are an angry poster in the attack attack attack mode. I won't dignify your childish personal criticisms. The numbers speak for themselves. You have made 17,375 posts. Just 390 likes. That's probably the worst ratio on the entire board, so I understand why you seem agitated.
 
Apr 13, 2002
44,001
97,149
0
It will be interesting to see how Dawson fares with an accurate QB and a pretty good running back, against a team he knows very well. Cats should win this one, but it is not a cupcake. Good opening test, and critical to a successful year.

Exactly. A good team, hungry for a BCS conference win, lead by an OC with intimate knowledge of the opponent and a huge chip on his shoulder. This is a cupcake in name only.
 

sluggercatfan

Heisman
Aug 17, 2004
35,953
29,631
0
They scored 45 against Charlotte and we scored 52. They did most of their damage against bad teams... 1 win against top 60. I'm not saying they aren't good but if we play their schedule I think we have at least as good of record and score as many, or more, points.

Wku manhandled them. Not saying we beat wku last year but they don't match up physically with us. If ware, bonner, and Allen can provide heat I just don't see them scoring 30+ on us.

I'm more worried about vandy and missou as winnable games. Those 2 teams are a good qb away from being pretty good.
My point is that on paper everything seems to be fairly equal with only their excellent qb possibly being the difference...lots of turnover on both sides ... silk believe we will need to score a bunch to win.
 

Levibooty

All-American
Jun 29, 2005
26,547
7,667
0
Half the players you mentioned have not played a college game.

The other half, what have they done so far?

Apples and oranges comparison. Elam may have developed different under Saban. As it stands he would not have started for Bama in 2015. Their DTs were miles ahead of him.

You have to spend time building a solid foundation when constructing a building, you cannot skimp on materials and time when laying the foundation because that is what the entire project rests on. Skip paying attention to the foundation and no matter how pleasing to the eye the building is when completed it will have long term problems and be at risk in every storm. Expecting to have a well built structure by hurrying, skimping, or ignoring the process of building the foundation properly will only lead to premature structural failure. Building correctly requires knowledge, a bit of patience, and foresight on a part of the structure the vast majority of people never see or appreciate and know very little of it's value.

You cannot start erecting the walls until the foundation has properly matured or it will not sustain the weight properly.
 

BigBlueTuckian

Sophomore
Jan 9, 2016
309
198
0
You have to spend time building a solid foundation when constructing a building, you cannot skimp on materials and time when laying the foundation because that is what the entire project rests on. Skip paying attention to the foundation and no matter how pleasing to the eye the building is when completed it will have long term problems and be at risk in every storm. Expecting to have a well built structure by hurrying, skimping, or ignoring the process of building the foundation properly will only lead to premature structural failure. Building correctly requires knowledge, a bit of patience, and foresight on a part of the structure the vast majority of people never see or appreciate and know very little of it's value.

You cannot start erecting the walls until the foundation has properly matured or it will not sustain the weight properly.

Thanks for the construction lesson. Wasn't questioning Stoops' approach. The argument is whether any of our starters would start for Bama this year in the system that they run and taken directly from UK's roster without time to be developed by Saban. Answer IMO is no. Now if we go with the argument that some day they may because the foundation is being built that's different.
 

vhcat70

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
57,418
38,482
0
Most of your posts are nonsubstantive. Subjective opinions are nonsubstantive. Insults are also nonsubstantive. So there isn't very much to refute. In the past, I have sometimes agreed with your posts, but you do not remember that because you are an angry poster in the attack attack attack mode. I won't dignify your childish personal criticisms. The numbers speak for themselves. You have made 17,375 posts. Just 390 likes. That's probably the worst ratio on the entire board, so I understand why you seem agitated.
From the one trick pony responder.
 
Oct 1, 2001
5,199
1,898
0
Not a cakewalk, but I'll take the over & think like 10-14 pt win. I think we win 7, maybe 6. Just think the increased talent year by year has to break thru at some point (And should have last year between V/FL/AU.). I believe we have increased OC talent too. Seven would be 3 non-conference + V/SC/MO/MSU with MSU the most marginal. My next win would be FL, then UL.
Florida goes down in the Swamp. The streak ends.
 

jauk11

Heisman
Dec 6, 2006
60,631
18,638
0
The argument was whether or not Boom would start at Bama, not whether Harris will be their starter.

That being said, my gut feeling is Scarborough starts.

Not much doubt in my mind, his picture shows a beast in a football uniform. I also watched a mopup game where Harris gained a couple yards a couple of times and Scarbrough (or does it have an "o"?) was impossible to get down, although only about a 6 yard gain.

But I am confused, I think Harris was their starting RB in the spring game and I didn't hear Scarb mentioned, was he injured again? Delayed a year, injured a year, is he eligible for the draft after this year?