Both coming off a loss, Kinston has a good offense that will give the dogs secondary a true pass defense test, I will take Kinston in this ones 35-21.
WRH@Kinston
- Thread starter tardog08
- Start date
Sounds about right. If our dogs can maintain ball control, dogs might get this one
The dogs will have to figure out how to move the ball and get in the end zone.
Dogs have got to go out and get physical like they have been known to be. You got to want it! Key to stopping a good pass offense is keep that qb in the grass on his ***!
For WRH... it's hard to see a path to the end zone let alone a path to victory.
I'll take Kinston
I'll take Kinston
Shut down the pass or put the QB on his back side and WRH wins.
However, that is much easier said than done.
Kinston by 10+
However, that is much easier said than done.
Kinston by 10+
IF Wallace wins this game they have to dominate the run game. I’m not sure that will happen, but they did rush for over 380 yards last year against Kinston. Kinston has got better, Wallace had to replace some pieces. No one will stop Tyreek Copper but a run game that keeps the offense on the sideline is WRH best chance.
Also I saw Kinston vs ED scrimmage and there is no way ED would of 21-0 KHS
Also I saw Kinston vs ED scrimmage and there is no way ED would of 21-0 KHS
I wasn’t wrong! Bulldogs will continue to improve. Offense looked pretty good. A lot of injuries on offensive line tho
It was good to show WRH show some fight last night. They could have folded after Kinston scored on the first possession on a head scratching short field. They tried to control the ball on offense with the running game. On defense I couldn’t figure out why our DBs gave them so much room to operate. Kinston didn’t have a long pass all night but instead just simply dumped it off or a swing pass ate the WRH defense alive all night. We never tried to adjust to it. On offense we lack protection on the OLine. Matthew had absolutely no time to try and get off a pass when he had to. We also lack that typical WRH running back that can break off the big runs that have been a stable of WRH offenses. It was 4 yards and a cloud if dust which works some but its not typical WRH football. Any way they did play much better all around than they did the ED game. As coach Belichick would say its on to Clinton.
Why anyone would compare scores to try and predict who would win and by how many in a hypothetical matchup is beyond me. Same thing using a scrimmage to gauge how strong or weak a team is. Just not worth the effort.
My question is why wouldn't you? It is apart of the body of work... you think teams hide players in scrimmages?