He was short. How the hell did they give them a first down?
R RU_DIO Heisman Sep 1, 2002 15,977 15,732 113 Oct 24, 2015 #1 He was short. How the hell did they give them a first down? Reactions: rutgers48 and KaKaKen
Blitz8RU All-Conference Jan 24, 2012 77,393 4,170 113 Oct 24, 2015 #2 who cares. It wouldn't have mattered.
RUfromSoCal? Heisman Nov 26, 2006 33,918 41,378 113 Oct 24, 2015 #4 would it have mattered? probably not........ but bad spot.
Caliknight Hall of Famer Sep 21, 2001 195,622 147,225 113 Oct 24, 2015 #5 Awful job by the refs. Herbie and Folwer couldn't believe it either.
cubuffsdoug_rivals Heisman Apr 8, 2002 15,156 25,441 113 Oct 24, 2015 #7 RUfromSoCal? said: would it have mattered? probably not........ but bad spot. Click to expand... Maybe it's 3 pts instead of 7. If Rutgers was to mount a comeback it could be the difference in the game. Just wishful thinking.
RUfromSoCal? said: would it have mattered? probably not........ but bad spot. Click to expand... Maybe it's 3 pts instead of 7. If Rutgers was to mount a comeback it could be the difference in the game. Just wishful thinking.
D DHajekRC84 Heisman Aug 9, 2001 30,709 19,816 0 Oct 24, 2015 #8 the way Rutgers was playing D right there I say they would have tried for 3... but they were given 7 so we'll never know. We got screwed at home again..
the way Rutgers was playing D right there I say they would have tried for 3... but they were given 7 so we'll never know. We got screwed at home again..
R rutgers4life11 All-Conference Jan 22, 2014 2,951 2,450 0 Oct 24, 2015 #9 we're here complaining about calls by the refs instead of play calls by our coach... one is the reason we're down by 28
we're here complaining about calls by the refs instead of play calls by our coach... one is the reason we're down by 28
A anon_xekqhstck0ygt Guest Oct 24, 2015 #10 In their defense they were complaining when the game was zeroes Reactions: rutgers48