Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="xWVU2010x" data-source="post: 129869347" data-attributes="member: 1467482">If this team has the stones to overlookLast few years have shown that no teams seeded 14 or higher (even some 15s), are no joke. I feel last year we took the game lightly and we're unprepared as shown by our horrid shooting percentage on top of SFA being an unusually strong 14 seed. I would hope that everyone doesn't repeat any mistakes in preparation this time around and plays a strong game, if we play a good game Bucknell on paper (again, #80 KenPom) shouldn't be able to beat us without shooting an unusual filthy percentage from 3.I don't think anyone on this board is going to outright disrespect Bucknell but realistically speaking we could have gotten saddled with a more dangerous opponent so in that sense there is a little sigh of relief. I won't really feel good about it until the clock is 0:00 and we're being penciled into the round of 32.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="xWVU2010x, post: 129869347, member: 1467482"] If this team has the stones to overlook Last few years have shown that no teams seeded 14 or higher (even some 15s), are no joke. I feel last year we took the game lightly and we're unprepared as shown by our horrid shooting percentage on top of SFA being an unusually strong 14 seed. I would hope that everyone doesn't repeat any mistakes in preparation this time around and plays a strong game, if we play a good game Bucknell on paper (again, #80 KenPom) shouldn't be able to beat us without shooting an unusual filthy percentage from 3. I don't think anyone on this board is going to outright disrespect Bucknell but realistically speaking we could have gotten saddled with a more dangerous opponent so in that sense there is a little sigh of relief. I won't really feel good about it until the clock is 0:00 and we're being penciled into the round of 32. [/QUOTE]

Name