No offense, but wouldn't it have been even more baseless to have said last year's team would go 10 - 3? That bias that lies deep within a member of a fan base is called hope. The professional pundits and writers have the same biases and even less background information regarding any particular team. Phil Steele picks Texas over WVU every year, but it has no effect on the outcome.
We may as well be debating tomorrow's weather at this point. Why would anyone ridicule someone else's prediction, regardless of how it may conflict with another 'more reasonable' expectation? I wonder if Owen Schmitt thinks WVU has no chance to beat Oklahoma this year. Part of the excitement of college football is the unpredictability of many games throughout the year. I will make one little jab at your post, but I'm only teasing: How can you go 10 - 1 this year when you will likely play 13 games? [thumbsup]
It's a 12 game regular season -- sorry for the typo haha. But my point is that there is absolutely no way we can know what type of product is going to be put on the field until September. These Big 12 writers are idiots. If we listened to them we'd win 6 games every year. All predictions are baseless, yet people are in here taking it personally when someone disagrees with them. I find it funny, but I thought it was worth mentioning that the jag in here telling people theyre stupid for being optimistic has nothing more to go on for his "doom and gloom" mentality.