11 Replies
Denny1034
Nov 02, 1:12 PM
I’ve always been of the belief that coaches focusing off the field on potential suitors end up suffering on the field during season. Think it’s pretty obvious
Grogu99
Nov 02, 1:13 PM
Mandingo Warrior said:Too busy thinking about how much money they are about to make
Uncle Baby Billy
Nov 02, 1:15 PM
Wow one loss!
Allen ray
Nov 02, 1:15 PM
Mandingo Warrior said:A lot of those got beat in pretty dominant fashion too. Key, Lea, sumrall
meantweets
Nov 02, 1:17 PM
Josh Heupel? Why is he on this list?
Reed
Nov 02, 1:21 PM
You know who didn’t lose yesterday? James Franklin 😤
NBWeagle
Nov 02, 1:21 PM
meantweets said:Confused me too. I’m guessing he’s a name in the LSU search, maybe?Josh Heupel? Why is he on this list?
Crab__Island
Nov 02, 1:22 PM
That’s because none of them are elite. It may happen down the road, but the hiring pool is pretty dry. Not to mention better jobs than AU are available and they’ve had a head start on vetting coaches and determining interest.
HC searches are like musical chairs- someone is gonna get left out.
AUwesome
Nov 02, 1:23 PM
Reed said:That’s because he’s already met his quota of losing for the year. Pre season 1 or 2 and shit his entire season away.You know who didn’t lose yesterday? James Franklin 😤
WMC75
Nov 02, 1:29 PM
How many of those teams looked lost and hopelessly overmatched? Good teams can be well coached and still lose A game
but our team looks bewildered and out of their depth week after week. Not the same.
BigBarnerBrand
Nov 02, 1:37 PM
NBWeagle said:OklahomaConfused me too. I’m guessing he’s a name in the LSU search, maybe?
Thanks for checking out this free message board preview.
Join the full discussion at The Corner