NBA Draft
2023 NBA Draft by Stars
Recruiting class to draft outcomes for the 2023 NBA Draft.
Total Drafted
58
2023 draft
5-Star
16
27.6% of draftees
4-Star
22
37.9% of draftees
3-Star
6
10.3% of draftees
01 · ELITE TIER
5-Star Recruits
114.3%DRAFTRATE
Drafted
16
Recruited
14
% of Draftees
27.6%
% of Recruits
3.2%
31.8×more likely to be drafted
02 · BLUE CHIP
4-Star Recruits
20.0%DRAFTRATE
Drafted
22
Recruited
110
% of Draftees
37.9%
% of Recruits
4.4%
5.6×more likely to be drafted
03 · PROSPECT
3-Star Recruits
3.6%DRAFTRATE
Drafted
6
Recruited
167
% of Draftees
10.3%
% of Recruits
1.2%
Baselinecomparison tier
Draft Talent · By State
Sorted by Draft Talent Ratio — blue chip share ÷ population share
| # | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | South Carolina | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7.9% | 2% | 505% |
| 02 | West Virginia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2.6% | <1% | 490% |
| 03 | Kansas | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2.6% | <1% | 298% |
| 04 | Arkansas | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2.6% | <1% | 289% |
| 05 | Maryland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5.3% | 2% | 283% |
| 06 | Nevada | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2.6% | <1% | 278% |
| 07 | Florida | 1 | 5 | 1 | 9 | 15.8% | 7% | 241% |
| 08 | New Jersey | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5.3% | 3% | 188% |
| 09 | Michigan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5.3% | 3% | 174% |
| 10 | Alabama | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2.6% | 2% | 173% |
| 11 | Wisconsin | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2.6% | 2% | 148% |
| 12 | Texas | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 13.2% | 9% | 148% |
| 13 | Indiana | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2.6% | 2% | 128% |
| 14 | Tennessee | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2.6% | 2% | 125% |
| 15 | California | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 13.2% | 12% | 111% |
| 16 | Georgia | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2.6% | 3% | 81% |
| 17 | Ohio | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2.6% | 4% | 74% |
| 18 | Pennsylvania | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2.6% | 4% | 67% |
| 19 | New York | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2.6% | 6% | 44% |
| 20 | Alaska | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 21 | Arizona | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2% | 0% |
| 22 | Colorado | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 2% | 0% |
| 23 | Connecticut | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 1% | 0% |
| 24 | Delaware | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 25 | District Of Columbia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 26 | Hawaii | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 27 | Idaho | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 28 | Illinois | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 4% | 0% |
| 29 | Iowa | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 30 | Kentucky | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 1% | 0% |
| 31 | Louisiana | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 1% | 0% |
| 32 | Maine | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 33 | Massachusetts | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 2% | 0% |
| 34 | Minnesota | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 2% | 0% |
| 35 | Mississippi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 36 | Missouri | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 2% | 0% |
| 37 | Montana | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 38 | Nebraska | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 39 | New Hampshire | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 40 | New Mexico | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 41 | North Carolina | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3% | 0% |
| 42 | North Dakota | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 43 | Oklahoma | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 1% | 0% |
| 44 | Oregon | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 1% | 0% |
| 45 | Rhode Island | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 46 | South Dakota | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 47 | Utah | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 1% | 0% |
| 48 | Vermont | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 49 | Virginia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 3% | 0% |
| 50 | Washington | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 2% | 0% |
| 51 | Wyoming | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |