NFL Draft
2016 NFL Draft by Stars
Recruiting class to draft outcomes for the 2016 NFL Draft.
Total Drafted
253
2016 draft
5-Star
27
10.7% of draftees
4-Star
74
29.2% of draftees
3-Star
106
41.9% of draftees
01 · ELITE TIER
5-Star Recruits
84.4%DRAFTRATE
Drafted
27
Recruited
32
% of Draftees
10.7%
% of Recruits
0.7%
17.0×more likely to be drafted
02 · BLUE CHIP
4-Star Recruits
21.1%DRAFTRATE
Drafted
74
Recruited
351
% of Draftees
29.2%
% of Recruits
2.0%
4.3×more likely to be drafted
03 · PROSPECT
3-Star Recruits
5.0%DRAFTRATE
Drafted
106
Recruited
2,137
% of Draftees
41.9%
% of Recruits
2.9%
Baselinecomparison tier
Draft Talent · By State
Sorted by Draft Talent Ratio — blue chip share ÷ population share
| # | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | District Of Columbia | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1.0% | <1% | 465% |
| 02 | Arkansas | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3.0% | <1% | 321% |
| 03 | South Carolina | 0 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 4.0% | 2% | 258% |
| 04 | Florida | 7 | 9 | 13 | 30 | 15.8% | 6% | 248% |
| 05 | Hawaii | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1.0% | <1% | 224% |
| 06 | Ohio | 2 | 6 | 6 | 14 | 7.9% | 4% | 220% |
| 07 | Georgia | 3 | 4 | 5 | 14 | 6.9% | 3% | 217% |
| 08 | Mississippi | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2.0% | <1% | 214% |
| 09 | Maryland | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 4.0% | 2% | 213% |
| 10 | Texas | 1 | 12 | 13 | 32 | 12.9% | 9% | 149% |
| 11 | Louisiana | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2.0% | 1% | 137% |
| 12 | Washington | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3.0% | 2% | 131% |
| 13 | Kansas | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1.0% | <1% | 110% |
| 14 | Nevada | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1.0% | <1% | 110% |
| 15 | New Jersey | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 3.0% | 3% | 108% |
| 16 | Utah | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1.0% | <1% | 105% |
| 17 | Missouri | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2.0% | 2% | 105% |
| 18 | Iowa | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1.0% | <1% | 102% |
| 19 | Indiana | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2.0% | 2% | 96% |
| 20 | North Carolina | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 3.0% | 3% | 94% |
| 21 | California | 2 | 9 | 14 | 26 | 10.9% | 12% | 90% |
| 22 | Oklahoma | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1.0% | 1% | 81% |
| 23 | Oregon | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1.0% | 1% | 78% |
| 24 | Alabama | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 1.0% | 2% | 66% |
| 25 | Michigan | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 2.0% | 3% | 64% |
| 26 | Pennsylvania | 1 | 1 | 6 | 9 | 2.0% | 4% | 50% |
| 27 | Illinois | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 2.0% | 4% | 50% |
| 28 | Tennessee | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1.0% | 2% | 48% |
| 29 | Arizona | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 1.0% | 2% | 46% |
| 30 | Virginia | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 1.0% | 3% | 38% |
| 31 | Alaska | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 32 | Colorado | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 2% | 0% |
| 33 | Connecticut | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 1% | 0% |
| 34 | Delaware | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 35 | Idaho | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 36 | Kentucky | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1% | 0% |
| 37 | Maine | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 38 | Massachusetts | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2% | 0% |
| 39 | Minnesota | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 2% | 0% |
| 40 | Montana | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 41 | Nebraska | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 42 | New Hampshire | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 43 | New Mexico | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 44 | New York | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 6% | 0% |
| 45 | North Dakota | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 46 | Rhode Island | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 47 | South Dakota | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 48 | Vermont | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 49 | West Virginia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 50 | Wisconsin | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0.0% | 2% | 0% |
| 51 | Wyoming | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |