NFL Draft
2023 NFL Draft by Stars
Recruiting class to draft outcomes for the 2023 NFL Draft.
Total Drafted
259
2023 draft
5-Star
26
10.0% of draftees
4-Star
83
32.0% of draftees
3-Star
118
45.6% of draftees
01 · ELITE TIER
5-Star Recruits
81.3%DRAFTRATE
Drafted
26
Recruited
32
% of Draftees
10.0%
% of Recruits
0.8%
12.9×more likely to be drafted
02 · BLUE CHIP
4-Star Recruits
22.9%DRAFTRATE
Drafted
83
Recruited
363
% of Draftees
32.0%
% of Recruits
2.4%
3.6×more likely to be drafted
03 · PROSPECT
3-Star Recruits
6.3%DRAFTRATE
Drafted
118
Recruited
1,875
% of Draftees
45.6%
% of Recruits
3.5%
Baselinecomparison tier
Draft Talent · By State
Sorted by Draft Talent Ratio — blue chip share ÷ population share
| # | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | West Virginia | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2.8% | <1% | 512% |
| 02 | District Of Columbia | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.9% | <1% | 454% |
| 03 | Georgia | 5 | 11 | 8 | 24 | 14.7% | 3% | 451% |
| 04 | Mississippi | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 3.7% | <1% | 413% |
| 05 | Utah | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 3.7% | 1% | 365% |
| 06 | Nevada | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2.8% | <1% | 291% |
| 07 | Hawaii | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0.9% | <1% | 211% |
| 08 | Florida | 3 | 12 | 15 | 35 | 13.8% | 7% | 210% |
| 09 | Maryland | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 3.7% | 2% | 198% |
| 10 | Louisiana | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 2.8% | 1% | 198% |
| 11 | South Carolina | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 2.8% | 2% | 176% |
| 12 | Texas | 4 | 10 | 15 | 30 | 12.8% | 9% | 144% |
| 13 | North Carolina | 2 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 3.7% | 3% | 115% |
| 14 | Ohio | 2 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 3.7% | 4% | 103% |
| 15 | New Jersey | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2.8% | 3% | 99% |
| 16 | Iowa | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.9% | <1% | 95% |
| 17 | California | 1 | 11 | 6 | 23 | 11.0% | 12% | 93% |
| 18 | Michigan | 0 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 2.8% | 3% | 91% |
| 19 | Arizona | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1.8% | 2% | 84% |
| 20 | Oregon | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.9% | 1% | 72% |
| 21 | Pennsylvania | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 2.8% | 4% | 70% |
| 22 | Kentucky | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.9% | 1% | 68% |
| 23 | Illinois | 0 | 2 | 9 | 12 | 1.8% | 4% | 48% |
| 24 | Indiana | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.9% | 2% | 45% |
| 25 | Tennessee | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.9% | 2% | 44% |
| 26 | Alabama | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0.0% | 2% | 0% |
| 27 | Alaska | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 28 | Arkansas | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 29 | Colorado | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2% | 0% |
| 30 | Connecticut | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1% | 0% |
| 31 | Delaware | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 32 | Idaho | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 33 | Kansas | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 34 | Maine | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 35 | Massachusetts | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 2% | 0% |
| 36 | Minnesota | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2% | 0% |
| 37 | Missouri | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2% | 0% |
| 38 | Montana | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 39 | Nebraska | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 40 | New Hampshire | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 41 | New Mexico | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 42 | New York | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0.0% | 6% | 0% |
| 43 | North Dakota | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 44 | Oklahoma | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1% | 0% |
| 45 | Rhode Island | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 46 | South Dakota | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 47 | Vermont | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 48 | Virginia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 3% | 0% |
| 49 | Washington | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 2% | 0% |
| 50 | Wisconsin | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2% | 0% |
| 51 | Wyoming | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |