NFL Draft
2019–2023 NFL Draft by Stars
Recruiting class to draft outcomes across the 2019–2023 NFL drafts.
Total Drafted
1,287
2019–2023 drafts
5-Star
106
8.2% of draftees
4-Star
412
32.0% of draftees
3-Star
608
47.2% of draftees
01 · ELITE TIER
5-Star Recruits
67.5%DRAFTRATE
Drafted
106
Recruited
157
% of Draftees
8.2%
% of Recruits
0.6%
10.7×more likely to be drafted
02 · BLUE CHIP
4-Star Recruits
22.7%DRAFTRATE
Drafted
412
Recruited
1,816
% of Draftees
32.0%
% of Recruits
2.4%
3.6×more likely to be drafted
03 · PROSPECT
3-Star Recruits
6.3%DRAFTRATE
Drafted
608
Recruited
9,620
% of Draftees
47.2%
% of Recruits
3.6%
Baselinecomparison tier
Draft Talent · By State
Sorted by Draft Talent Ratio — blue chip share ÷ population share
| # | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Mississippi | 4 | 12 | 16 | 34 | 3.1% | <1% | 346% |
| 02 | Louisiana | 5 | 19 | 26 | 54 | 4.6% | 1% | 331% |
| 03 | Georgia | 18 | 35 | 47 | 110 | 10.2% | 3% | 315% |
| 04 | Alabama | 3 | 14 | 17 | 41 | 3.3% | 2% | 217% |
| 05 | District Of Columbia | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0.4% | <1% | 188% |
| 06 | Florida | 12 | 50 | 69 | 145 | 12.0% | 7% | 183% |
| 07 | Maryland | 2 | 14 | 11 | 32 | 3.1% | 2% | 166% |
| 08 | Utah | 1 | 7 | 9 | 23 | 1.5% | <1% | 155% |
| 09 | Texas | 14 | 56 | 81 | 157 | 13.5% | 9% | 152% |
| 10 | Tennessee | 4 | 12 | 10 | 29 | 3.1% | 2% | 147% |
| 11 | North Carolina | 5 | 16 | 15 | 46 | 4.1% | 3% | 128% |
| 12 | South Carolina | 3 | 7 | 14 | 28 | 1.9% | 2% | 124% |
| 13 | West Virginia | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0.6% | <1% | 107% |
| 14 | Ohio | 3 | 16 | 25 | 52 | 3.7% | 4% | 103% |
| 15 | Nevada | 1 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 1.0% | <1% | 102% |
| 16 | Hawaii | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0.4% | <1% | 89% |
| 17 | Kentucky | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 1.2% | 1% | 85% |
| 18 | Arkansas | 1 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 0.8% | <1% | 85% |
| 19 | New Jersey | 2 | 10 | 15 | 28 | 2.3% | 3% | 83% |
| 20 | Michigan | 1 | 12 | 17 | 37 | 2.5% | 3% | 83% |
| 21 | Oklahoma | 1 | 4 | 12 | 17 | 1.0% | 1% | 80% |
| 22 | Pennsylvania | 1 | 15 | 13 | 34 | 3.1% | 4% | 79% |
| 23 | California | 10 | 38 | 45 | 110 | 9.3% | 12% | 78% |
| 24 | Oregon | 0 | 5 | 7 | 14 | 1.0% | 1% | 75% |
| 25 | Missouri | 0 | 7 | 11 | 23 | 1.4% | 2% | 73% |
| 26 | South Dakota | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0.2% | <1% | 72% |
| 27 | Indiana | 0 | 7 | 11 | 20 | 1.4% | 2% | 66% |
| 28 | Kansas | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 0.6% | <1% | 65% |
| 29 | Iowa | 0 | 3 | 7 | 12 | 0.6% | <1% | 60% |
| 30 | Virginia | 1 | 7 | 13 | 29 | 1.5% | 3% | 59% |
| 31 | Rhode Island | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.2% | <1% | 59% |
| 32 | Arizona | 3 | 3 | 6 | 14 | 1.2% | 2% | 53% |
| 33 | Illinois | 2 | 6 | 24 | 35 | 1.5% | 4% | 40% |
| 34 | Connecticut | 1 | 1 | 9 | 12 | 0.4% | 1% | 36% |
| 35 | Idaho | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.2% | <1% | 34% |
| 36 | Minnesota | 0 | 3 | 7 | 16 | 0.6% | 2% | 34% |
| 37 | Nebraska | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.2% | <1% | 33% |
| 38 | Wisconsin | 0 | 3 | 12 | 19 | 0.6% | 2% | 33% |
| 39 | New Mexico | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.2% | <1% | 30% |
| 40 | Washington | 1 | 2 | 10 | 14 | 0.6% | 2% | 25% |
| 41 | Massachusetts | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.2% | 2% | 9% |
| 42 | New York | 1 | 1 | 6 | 11 | 0.4% | 6% | 6% |
| 43 | Alaska | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 44 | Colorado | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 2% | 0% |
| 45 | Delaware | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 46 | Maine | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 47 | Montana | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 48 | New Hampshire | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 49 | North Dakota | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 50 | Vermont | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 51 | Wyoming | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |