OK, so now per the voting rights act we're talking about authority directly delegated by the Congress.
Yes, jumping directly to the fascist card does say something here. It is what it is.
Should/Will Trump Declare a National Emergency to "Protect" Our Election?
- Thread starter What Would Jesus Do?
- Start date
Yes, jumping directly to the fascist card does say something here. It is what it is.
This is BS what if scenario. Any orders Trump may issue will be lawful based on circumstances at the time.
Somebody's job is in jeopardy and the search is on for someone who will fall in line.
IT'S OFFICIAL: The Trump DOJ has made MAJOR voter fraud arrests in the following states- Wisconsin
- Michigan
- New Jersey
- Massachusetts
- Georgia
- Texas
- Idaho
And MANY more are coming. Noncitizen voter fraud is FINALLY being prosecuted on a larger scale!
It will be the MISSION of Trump's DHS and DOJ to root out any and all cheating this November
This needs to be paired with new election laws passed by Congress. One election day, mail-in voting restrictions, voter ID and proof of citizenship, and stop making people wait WEEKS for vote counting
No wonder so many people have not trusted elections in every state. You need SECURE ELECTIONS for a secure America
This is misleading because they can't do any mass purges this close to an election. Don't cry.
The National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) restricts systematic voter-roll purges in the 90 days before a federal election, but it does not ban all activity.
Under 52 U.S.C. § 20507(c)(2)(A), states must complete any program whose purpose is to systematically remove the names of ineligible voters from the official lists no later than 90 days before a primary or general election for federal office. This “quiet period” or “moratorium” is designed to prevent last-minute mass removals that could incorrectly take eligible voters off the rolls with little time to correct errors.
Key points relevant to the recent Supreme Court ruling on the SAVE citizenship database:
- The restriction targets systematic programs (e.g., broad data-matching or bulk processing that sweeps large numbers of names). It does not freeze the rolls entirely.
- Individualized inquiries and certain removals remain allowed. These include removals at the voter’s own request, due to death, or (where state law provides) for criminal conviction or mental incapacity. Courts have treated case-by-case reviews differently from systematic ones.
- In its September 25, 2026 order allowing the Trump administration to use the modified SAVE system, the Supreme Court majority explicitly recognized the NVRA’s 90-day limit. It stated that the restriction “limits the potential impact” of restoring the database this close to the November 3 midterms (roughly 38–39 days away at the time of the ruling). However, the majority emphasized that the lower-court injunction had also blocked individualized inquiries, which federal law permits during the quiet period, and that this inhibited the federal government’s ability to assist states.
Supreme Court Upholds Immigration Voter Checks
Yes, the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) restricts systematic voter-roll purges in the 90 days before a federal election, but it does not ban all activity. Under 52 U.S.C. § 20507(c)(2)(A), states must complete any program whose purpose is to systematically remove the names of ineligible...
They can sure as hell arrest state officials who ignore and let illegals vote.This is misleading because they can't do any mass purges this close to an election. Don't cry.
The National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) restricts systematic voter-roll purges in the 90 days before a federal election, but it does not ban all activity.
Under 52 U.S.C. § 20507(c)(2)(A), states must complete any program whose purpose is to systematically remove the names of ineligible voters from the official lists no later than 90 days before a primary or general election for federal office. This “quiet period” or “moratorium” is designed to prevent last-minute mass removals that could incorrectly take eligible voters off the rolls with little time to correct errors.
Key points relevant to the recent Supreme Court ruling on the SAVE citizenship database:
In short, bulk/systematic purges via the database (or similar tools) are restricted right now, but targeted, individualized citizenship checks and related inquiries are not. The practical short-term effect of the ruling is therefore limited, as both the majority and dissenting justices noted. Separate litigation is pending on the precise scope of the quiet period for noncitizen-related removals, but that will not be resolved before the midterms.
- The restriction targets systematic programs (e.g., broad data-matching or bulk processing that sweeps large numbers of names). It does not freeze the rolls entirely.
- Individualized inquiries and certain removals remain allowed. These include removals at the voter’s own request, due to death, or (where state law provides) for criminal conviction or mental incapacity. Courts have treated case-by-case reviews differently from systematic ones.
- In its September 25, 2026 order allowing the Trump administration to use the modified SAVE system, the Supreme Court majority explicitly recognized the NVRA’s 90-day limit. It stated that the restriction “limits the potential impact” of restoring the database this close to the November 3 midterms (roughly 38–39 days away at the time of the ruling). However, the majority emphasized that the lower-court injunction had also blocked individualized inquiries, which federal law permits during the quiet period, and that this inhibited the federal government’s ability to assist states.
Supreme Court Upholds Immigration Voter Checks
Yes, the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) restricts systematic voter-roll purges in the 90 days before a federal election, but it does not ban all activity. Under 52 U.S.C. § 20507(c)(2)(A), states must complete any program whose purpose is to systematically remove the names of ineligible...x.com
#BREAKING The Supreme Court just opened the door to the federal government, using a much more powerful way of cleaning up voter rolls at scale to ensure there is no cheating and that illegal aliens are not voting. The Court has allowed the Department of Homeland Security use its revamped SAVE database to check voter-registration records against federal immigration and Social Security data.
It was originally designed to verify the immigration status of individual noncitizens seeking government benefits. Now, DHS can use Social Security numbers, search records involving U.S.-born citizens and process large batches of records simultaneously.
That means states can potentially identify noncitizens who are registered to vote. Instead of checking voters one by one, the federal government has opened the door to checking voter rolls at scale.
The Scotus ruling gave the federal government the ability to cross-check massive voter files against federal citizenship and immigration records—and potentially giving states a powerful new tool to identify and remove ineligible registrations. #BreakingNews #news #breaking
You mean those state officials that they laughably accused of having hundreds of thousands of non-citizens on their voter rolls? Our government is incompetent and corrupt as f.uck and not a damn thing will happen to anybody but you will be bigly sadz when we wipe the floor with your sh*t candidates anyway(without them).
The only way it can come into play is disqualifying illegals registered to vote. Im sure you dont have a problem with it???
People forget that @AAGDhillon worked with @KariLake to investigate Arizona election fraud after @katiehobbs rigged the Maricopa machines to steal the Governor’s race in 2022.
Harmeet Dhillon knows exactly how Democrats steal elections and where all the bodies are buried.
Now she’s in charge of the DOJ’s weapons to prosecute this systemic election fraud scam nationwide.
Hundreds of DOJ lawyers with the full power of the federal government.
Get ready.
IT'S OFFICIAL: SecWar Pete Hegseth has ordered Pentagon personnel to go CYBER WAR MODE on foreign actors trying to interfere in the 2026 US electionsOUR SECWAR IS PLAYING NO GAMES
Hegseth is employing US Cyber Command and the Directors of the Combat Support Agencies, plus the Defense Intelligence Enterprise to defend US elections from foreign actors
"As we approach this election cycle, we must prove that we can and will protect the integrity of our democratic processes from any threat," the memo obtained by Axios says
The security of our elections is national security. Thank you, @PeteHegseth!
Democrats will say this is a bad thing because they WANT cheating.
@TigerGrowls
I don't know if you know this. But states have the right to conduct their elections how they see fit. Its in the constitution. Donald Trump cannot interfere with that. Hope you have a nice day.
I don't know if you know this. But states have the right to conduct their elections how they see fit. Its in the constitution. Donald Trump cannot interfere with that. Hope you have a nice day.
Should he? Of course not.
Will he? I'd say there's a better than even shot that he will. He's insane.
Will he? I'd say there's a better than even shot that he will. He's insane.
Unconstitutional and agsinst the law. But we know you dont care about the law. You only care about glorifying Trump. Youre in a cult. A really weird cult.
You posted at around 4:30 PM EST ... you couldn't sleep? Your handlers woke you up because you weren't meeting your propagandizing quota?
If this was in German and said in 1929, you'd be right. Let's hope you aren't.
Latest
-
01
Tiger Illustrated Football
Wednesday Clemson Football & Recruiting Insider
-
02
Tiger Illustrated Football Recruiting
Wednesday Clemson Football Recruiting Nuggets
-
03
Tiger Illustrated Football Recruiting
Behind recent Clemson vs. Miami recruiting battles
-
04
Tiger Illustrated Football
An object of intrigue within Clemson's defense moving forward
-
05
Tiger Illustrated Football
Dabo Swinney on elite Miami team, Ashton Hampton, injuries, night game atmosphere & more