A foul is a foul. Just because someone doesn't end up on the ground does it mean it's not a foul. Just means I might let play go for a couple more seconds to see if the player is able to fully recover and continue their possession/attack. The number of clumsy fouls I've called against a defender flailing at the ball and catching a girl in the shin guard (everyone can hear the crack) causing the attacker to lose the ball despite the attacker not going to ground is too many to count. Coaches and parents always yell about it.
Now, if the standard for what was called a foul was different for each team, then we can talk. Even being a referee, I hate the standard even seeming different. Coaches will always ***** about more fouls being called on their team, which is fine until they throw in the "why are we being penalized for being aggressive?" More aggressive teams, more physical teams will always have more fouls called against them. It's a byproduct of being more aggressive and more physical and yes there may be a big disparity in the number of fouls called between the two teams. I'm not picking on your team, they're literally committing more fouls.
I'm not a ref, so I'm going to defer to y'all on it. I know my take is just an opinion based in feelings and not really facts of the game. It does seem like such a shock though to play games in "the north" and have every little thing held against you. That's all it really is, I guess.