2-5 Mizzou opens as...

BluffaloSlim

Sophomore
Jan 1, 2016
259
150
0
We may lose.
Value is on us and ML.

This is a coin flip game because it's a Mizzou. We are the better team
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,943
60,389
113
Against P5 competition he is 72-151 (48%), 5 td, 6 int and 236 passing yards per game.

Considering 3 of those tds and 376 passing yards came against a georgia team that is in the bottom 3rd of passing defense, and I'd say that lock is actually a poor QB that has racked up stats against really bad defenses

But, I think three of their P5 losses were against top 25 teams. They lost to WVU, LSU, UF, and UGA. I hope we are a composite of those teams. I would take that!
 

allabouttheUK

All-Conference
Jan 28, 2015
3,079
3,390
0
Last time we played there we lost 20-10. Kickoff was 4:00 pm. It was a tortuous game to watch. UK was bad. Really bad.

So, based upon that alone, give me a noon start.

Agree on the noon start, but also consider that the last time we played there they had a REALLY good team, with a REALLY good coach. They aren't close to that team that beat us 20-10, and we aren't close to the team we were either.
 

WildCard

All-American
May 29, 2001
65,040
7,390
0
I don't post often, but I have been reading this board for years. WildCard always works a backhanded complement or some little dig at UK in a lot of his posts. He posts on almost every thread I read. While some of what he says may be true, I don't like hearing from a fan of our rival. I still welcome his posts, but I understand how he can irritate some of our fans...me included.
Thank you. I will take that as a "backhanded compliment". :D FWIW, I try to call 'em as I see 'em about the Cats AND the Cards but some people have trouble accepting anything remotely unflattering about their school (including hard statistical facts). I followed UK football and had season tix a long time before becoming a "Card fan first" (mid-80s with Schnellenberger). Quite frankly, I think my "criticisms" of UK are reserved and unemotional compared to many regular posters on this board. The big difference is that I am a Card fan that also supports UK football. FWIW, that is also really hard for a number of my Card friends to accept.

You're a good poster as rival fans go, but "your's" in a post criticizing someone else's grasp of the language? Tsk, tsk.
You got me, johnny! I deserve that. I will let is stand for further ridicule. Damn apostrophes.

WildCard is one of the better posters on this board. TS.
Thank you. I wish I was as crafty as some say.

But back to the point of the thread. I am having a hard time seeing a 2-5 MO team as what is now a 4-5.5 favorite favorite in this game, a number "supported" by at least 3 prominent "power ranking" sites.

Peace
 
Last edited:

51stFan

Junior
Dec 30, 2005
405
341
0
That's a scary line. Looks to me like the are begging people to bet the Cats and that's not usually a good sign. I think it comes down to how we respond on the road. First "winnable" road game of the year and I just hope Vegas is not on to something.
 

WildcatofNati

Heisman
Mar 31, 2009
8,183
12,420
0
That's a scary line. Looks to me like the are begging people to bet the Cats and that's not usually a good sign. I think it comes down to how we respond on the road. First "winnable" road game of the year and I just hope Vegas is not on to something.
I doubt that it's anything more than a case of Vegas using the computer rankings as a baseline- and the Sagarins would actually have Mizzou as about a 6 point favorite. I usually think that these types of ratings are pretty close to the mark, but not in this case.

However, this game is anything but a slam dunk and a home game against Georgia may actually be more winnable. We are playing better than Mizzou lately, but, overall, we've had similar results in similar games. Mizzou has played three good teams on the road, and was crushed by two of them, and beaten pretty soundly (though not really crushed) in the other; we've played two good teams on the road, and were crushed in both. They lost to a midmajor at home; so did we. They clobbered their two cupcakes; we clobbered ours, albeit after a scare. Our big advantage is that we played 3 mediocre SEC teams at home, and won all three; they played one (Georgia) and lost, though the scores were close in all of the games, and Georgia is overall a bit better than the teams we played. So, while I am optimistic that we can win, I'm not surprised that we are underdogs, and I won't be surprised if we lose.
 

ScrewDuke1

Hall of Famer
Jul 29, 2016
41,091
152,751
113
[roll][roll][roll][roll][roll]

I have no confidence in our ability to stop a decent passing game. Like the final 2 drives against poor offenses Vandy & State when they had to pass ...we get absolutely no pass rush and they blow down the field.

Hopefully we control the ball...play clean and get some breaks. MTSU QB just picked them apart with timing passes.
I hope for best but think our defense will get exposed against a team that can run and throw
 

johnnyrockets

Junior
May 7, 2007
3,626
319
0
Several have mentioned Sagarin pegging Mizzou as a 5.5-6 point favorite and I've seen that as well. Does that system account for recency at all, does anyone know? It may be blue-tinted glasses but I feel like our play the past 4 games (yes, including Alabama) has been a marked improvement compared with the first three. I admit not to knowing much about Mizzou's trend, aside from losing the last game at home to MTSU.
 

laxcat#5

All-Conference
Oct 7, 2005
3,901
3,388
0
What is our modern day record when kickoff is at noon in the central time zone ?

It should be a big advantage for us. It's 11 AM for their players; whereas, it will feel like noon for our guys. Also, the stands are going to be empty.
 

bluedog79

All-American
Mar 4, 2008
6,015
5,290
0
Point spread is damn close 90% of the time. UK will lose this game. The refs will be hard at work. Look for pass interference called 5+ times when the tigers throw and offensive holding on UK on every big run.
 

WildcatofNati

Heisman
Mar 31, 2009
8,183
12,420
0
Point spread is damn close 90% of the time. UK will lose this game. The refs will be hard at work. Look for pass interference called 5+ times when the tigers throw and offensive holding on UK on every big run.
Why would the refs cheat on behalf of Mizzou? Mizzou has a very difficult path to a bowl game, even with a win. The SEC is going to want to fill those spots and right now, it's not going to be easy. UK is in better position to go to a bowl with a win- if that happens, UK is in, and Mizzou is out. If Mizzou wins, chances are good that both teams are out.
 

rmattox

All-Conference
Nov 26, 2014
6,786
4,006
0
Even if it were to wind up UK-4.5, we still have to go there and win. Maybe we go there and cruise against a deflated team. But I expect another game that goes down to the wire.
They won't be deflated. They will approach this game as a game they can and should win. Imo , we play flat. They will be pumped .
 

WildCard

All-American
May 29, 2001
65,040
7,390
0
Several have mentioned Sagarin pegging Mizzou as a 5.5-6 point favorite and I've seen that as well. Does that system account for recency at all, does anyone know? It may be blue-tinted glasses but I feel like our play the past 4 games (yes, including Alabama) has been a marked improvement compared with the first three. I admit not to knowing much about Mizzou's trend, aside from losing the last game at home to MTSU.
I am pretty sure they do not. I think all "power polls" (i.e., mathematical determinations of the anticipated "points difference" are determined by cumulative results and do not include a "streak factor". Given the weekly disparity in strength of opposition I'm not sure how you would quantify such.

Athlon, Gridiron and now CBS Sports are all predicting a Cats win. Take that Vegas.
It is one thing to offer an opinion and another thing to put your money where your mouth is. [laughing]

Peace
 

Johnfarrel

All-American
Oct 9, 2001
5,257
5,262
113
Vandy and MSU moved the ball late passing against a prevent defense. Kentucky moved the ball late passing against a prevent defense. I hate prevent defenses.
Neither Vandy nor MSU hurt Kentucky by passing otherwise.

Kentucky struggles against mobile QB's but Locke is not one. Kentucky's secondary should be up to limiting MIzu's passing game. I say should. We will have to wait and see.
 

KentuckyStout

Heisman
Sep 13, 2009
10,370
19,319
65
I trust Vegas more than ESPN analysts.

I'm worried about this game because it's on the road. Our last performance there was pitiful.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,943
60,389
113
Last time we played at Mizzou, we were not as good and they were ranked. Our defense did what it needed for most of that game, but the offense was really bad. I don't think that game is any predictor for this game.
 

sluggercatfan

Heisman
Aug 17, 2004
35,953
29,631
0
They won't be deflated. They will approach this game as a game they can and should win. Imo , we play flat. They will be pumped .
IF we play flat with all that is at stake for UK then things are we worse than I thought with MS and this program...Sat is a big statement game for the staff and players.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ukalum1988

allabouttheUK

All-Conference
Jan 28, 2015
3,079
3,390
0
Brother, if you're kickin' off on the moon you my friend are way ahead on the drinking schedule!

I mean come on man...kicking on the moon would improve hang time, and give our coverage team waaaay more time to get into position to prevent any returns at all. The moon kickoff is a no brainer!
 

rmattox

All-Conference
Nov 26, 2014
6,786
4,006
0
I mean come on man...kicking on the moon would improve hang time, and give our coverage team waaaay more time to get into position to prevent any returns at all. The moon kickoff is a no brainer!
Yeah, but it would be tough on the passing game. Every pass would float.
 

shutzhund

All-Conference
Nov 19, 2005
29,202
2,619
0
I don't post often, but I have been reading this board for years. WildCard always works a backhanded complement or some little dig at UK in a lot of his posts. He posts on almost every thread I read. While some of what he says may be true, I don't like hearing from a fan of our rival. I still welcome his posts, but I understand how he can irritate some of our fans...me included.

Chauvinism is not a good character trait. Might even be called a flaw.:rolleyes:
 

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,455
0
I doubt that it's anything more than a case of Vegas using the computer rankings as a baseline- and the Sagarins would actually have Mizzou as about a 6 point favorite. I usually think that these types of ratings are pretty close to the mark, but not in this case.

However, this game is anything but a slam dunk and a home game against Georgia may actually be more winnable. We are playing better than Mizzou lately, but, overall, we've had similar results in similar games. Mizzou has played three good teams on the road, and was crushed by two of them, and beaten pretty soundly (though not really crushed) in the other; we've played two good teams on the road, and were crushed in both. They lost to a midmajor at home; so did we. They clobbered their two cupcakes; we clobbered ours, albeit after a scare. Our big advantage is that we played 3 mediocre SEC teams at home, and won all three; they played one (Georgia) and lost, though the scores were close in all of the games, and Georgia is overall a bit better than the teams we played. So, while I am optimistic that we can win, I'm not surprised that we are underdogs, and I won't be surprised if we lose.
For me the difference is our trends. Ours is up, theirs is down. If we played our midmajor again, we would win. If they played MTSU again the same result is likely.
 

megablue

Heisman
Oct 2, 2012
13,488
13,087
113
I think KY wins on the strength of our running game.
Hopefully, we can get pressure on their quarterback and speed the game up for him, which will lead to bad decisions and bad throws.
 
  • Like
Reactions: allabouttheUK

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,455
0
They won't be deflated. They will approach this game as a game they can and should win. Imo , we play flat. They will be pumped .
It will be interesting to see if you're correct since they have nothing to be pumped about. They just suffered a demoralizing loss which took their season from circling the drain to firmly in the drain. They have been decimated by injuries and have little to play for. I expect them to put up a fight but pumped? I highly doubt it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deeeefense

bigbluehomer

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2012
1,181
1,351
0
We need to jump on them early. First possession take it down the field and punch it in for a TD. Send whatever fans that show up back to their tailgate at halftime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: allabouttheUK
Jul 18, 2010
5,161
4,434
0
Line now at 6.5 at some places :oops:

That is a 3.5 pt swing in three days in favor of a team coming off a embarrassing home loss and losing two of their defensive starters.

I would say this doesn't look good for the Cats.
 

allabouttheUK

All-Conference
Jan 28, 2015
3,079
3,390
0
Yeah, but it would be tough on the passing game. Every pass would float.


But would they get picked off??? Keep it on the ground, and force the other team to play from behind thus putting the ball in the air. 3 and outs all day long, baby!
 

WildCard

All-American
May 29, 2001
65,040
7,390
0
Line now at 6.5 at some places :oops:

That is a 3.5 pt swing in three days in favor of a team coming off a embarrassing home loss and losing two of their defensive starters.

I would say this doesn't look good for the Cats.
I saw that. Six is still the most common number. Most books opened their line at +3.5 and now moved to +6. Pretty hard to figure (at least for me). I can only conclude that the line makers are more impressed with Mizzou's losses (Sagarin SOS #34) than UK's wins (Sagarin SOS #58). But if I were betting I still like those 6 1/2 points.

Peace
 
  • Like
Reactions: allabouttheUK