I respect your opinion a lot, so I am curious your thoughts on how to fix the enrollment gap in B when it comes to classifications?
I'm not sure that there is a true fix to this without creating a different set of problems. If you fix one classification it likely creates a problem in another classification. The foundational issue is that Nebraska has 122 teams playing 11-man football next cycle (4 classes), 117 teams playing 8-man (3 classes), and 41 playing 6-man (1 class). That doesn't include the two 9-man schools we have in the All-Nations league. Mix that with the shear land size of our state - 430 miles east-west and 210 miles north-south - and it makes classification pretty difficult. An overwhelming majority of our state's population resides in a 30-40 mile radius.
The quantity of teams playing each style of football (11-8-6) makes it impossible to have equity in the # of teams per class. We could make 11-man 3 classes and go about 40 per class, but that broadens the gap from the top of A (Grand Island-1,023) to the bottom (Pius X-397), and it makes the gap in B insanely large (Hastings-385 to O'Neill-94). Positive = we get 3 classes of 11 man football with about the same number of teams in each class. Negative = the gap from the bottom of the class to the top is 4:1 (25%) in some cases.
In my opinion (and it is just that, opinion), we have to decide what are we looking for in classification? Do we want to have the same quantity of teams in each class, or do we want the bottom enrollment number of each class to be within ___ % of the top enrollment # of the class. To me, the latter makes more sense. The negative to doing it like this is it often means less teams in a classification and more classifications. The fewer teams in a classification, the less meaningful success becomes (to a degree). If you shrink the # of teams in a class I think you have to shrink the playoff size to match. Class B should be 8 teams (I could be convinced of 4).
When the topic of classification comes up there are a few ideas that frequently resurface that I don't believe are good for Nebraska or kids in general.
1- The multiplier for non-public schools
***Seems to be a large contingency in our state that believe because a kid comes from money they are automatically better at sports. There is not a direct correlation between money invested and success. And if this is a suggestion that private schools recruit and we should count kids as 1.33 for that reason, that now needs to apply to every public school with open enrollment. The fact of the matter is there has been and will always be "recruiting" going on in the metro....its even made its way to the panhandle. But the biggest recruiting tools are kids recruiting their friends and program reputation recruiting for itself. If you were a football player growing up in Norfolk would you want to go to Norfolk Senior High, Norfolk Catholic, or Lutheran High Northeast? Ask the same questions about a kid in Hastings, Fremont, Grand Island, North Platte, Columbus, Falls City, David City, etc...
2- The divider for F/R lunch students
***Nobody will ever convince me that a student should count as less than a whole person just because their family doesn't have a certain income. This notion that F/R lunch students should only count as .66 or .75 towards the enrollment count is inhumane. A kid is a kid, whether they are F/R lunch, have an IEP, or are a general education student.
3- English Premier League style Relegation
***Nebraska schools are so small that this is unrealistic in every class but A. Look at Seward and Elkhorn in class B. Elkhorn won a state title in 2020, they went 0-9 this year. Seward was 3-6 in 2020, they took the state champs to Overtime on the road in the playoffs this year. Athletes in small towns are so cyclical that it isn't justified or "right" to relegate a team based on how the classes 3 grades above them faired. Its why this "Emerging" district in class B is so illogical. Blair is 6-3 in 2020, now they will play in the emerging district. Make it make sense. Sandy Creek was a 3 win team in 2019, 2020, and 2021. They are back to back state champions now.
I don't have a perfect answer. If I had to pick 1 thing I think I would say we need to shrink the # of teams in each class to lessen the enrollment gap from top to bottom of each class, then shrink the playoff size to 25-33% of the total classification size. Might mean we have 10 classes of football. Fine with me.