2026 B1G Tourney Session IV Thread

El_Jefe

Heisman
Oct 11, 2021
2,867
10,592
113
I was hoping I was wrong.

so if a guy takes 5th in B1Gs he doesn’t get any points and the guy that took 4th at PAC 4 gets points?
No. That category is worth 10 pts and is scored 10-0.

Reminder that NCAA Seeding is a simulated round robin. Each sim match is scored according to the seeding criteria with pre-determined splits. The wrestler who goes 32-0 in the sim gets the 1, 31-1 gets the 2, etc.

The cheat code for NCAA seeding is: start with the coaches' rank. Then adjust with H2H where applicable. Those 2 categories correlate most closely to the actual seeds.

At 10%, Conference Placement is relatively minor and generally gets washed out over the course of the full round robin. Chances are it doesn't really make much difference because 2 guys in the sim are already differentiated by other categories.
 

PSUbluTX

All-Conference
Feb 7, 2018
293
1,219
93
Love to hear what Jesse did that Mitch and Barr didn’t.
I personally couldn't care less about these awards (kinda like Cael and co), and Mendez has had an amazing year (but Tom Ryan too?) . But it does sometimes seem like a concerted effort to not give all the prizes to Penn State regardless of merit.

It's like they don't want House Targaryen to have all the gold. No worries, the PSU dragon will be burning down the castle in Cleveland in 2 weeks regardless.
 

5q

All-Conference
Sep 8, 2001
1,465
1,975
113
You all see the team photo on instagram
Scooter way back on left , blaze way back on right

all others having a blast
 

PAgeologist

All-Conference
Oct 19, 2021
1,292
2,582
113
@Tom McAndrew killed wrestling (20,000 BC - 2026 AD).
angry kyle broflovski GIF by South Park
 

CarolinaFan1

Senior
Jun 7, 2025
167
738
93
From the Big Ten:


INDIVIDUAL AWARDS

Wrestler of the Year:
Jesse Mendez, Ohio State, 141

Freshman of the Year: Ben Davino, Ohio State, 133

Coach of the Year: Tom Ryan, Ohio State

Outstanding Wrestler of the Championships: PJ Duke, Penn State, 157



ALL-BIG TEN FIRST TEAM

Luke Lilledahl, Penn State, 125
Ben Davino, Ohio State, 133
Jesse Mendez, Ohio State, 141
Shayne Van Ness, Penn State, 149
PJ Duke, Penn State, 157
Mitchell Mesenbrink, Penn State 165
Levi Haines, Penn State, 174
Rocco Welsh, Penn State, 184
Josh Barr, Penn State, 197
Taye Ghadiali, Michigan, 285

ALL-BIG TEN SECOND TEAM

Jore Volk, Minnesota, 125
Marcus Blaze, Penn State, 133
Brock Hardy, Nebraska, 141
Ethan Stiles, Ohio State, 149
Antrell Taylor, Nebraska, 157
Mikey Caliendo, Iowa, 165
Christopher Minto, Nebraska, 174
Max McEnelly, Minnesota, 184
Camden McDaniel, Nebraska, 197
AJ Ferrari, Nebraska, 285



ATTENDANCE:

Session 1: 13,133

Session 2: 13,186

Session 3-4: 13,226

Total: 39,545

Is there a magazine PSU should be advertising in?
 
Jun 26, 2025
875
764
93


Agree with him regarding getting to his feet - and his hands off mat, but not sure I agree that they both landed on their back and neither was in a control position. McEnelly returned him to the mat from a rear-standing position and waa in a pretty clear control position as they hit the mat and after they hit the mat. Not sure what "reaction time" had to do with the mat return takedown as they hit before clock expired and McEnelly was clearly in control as they hit the mat and never lost control after hitting mat. Not saying the rule wasn't applied correctly, just saying the rationale doesn't make sense to me if correctly applied.
 

Sportfan2017

Senior
Jun 28, 2017
174
623
93
There is no old/new rule. They’ve just taken “reaction time” and interpreted it as something completely different from what it’s always been.
I did not see any of the match, but I feel I am just as qualified to comment on it as those who did :). I believe the call was entirely correct and totally unfair. Just to clarify further.....the "Old" rule did in fact allow for reaction time as determined by the referee. Then they changed the "Old" rule to the "Less Old" rule. It stated that even instantaneous/brief finger touching was a takedown.....NO reaction time. Ask Max Dean about that rule....he got burned. This year they tossed the "Less Old" rule and allowed for some reaction time. How much? It seems to depend. It appears to me that the more the wrestler is moving...it appears to allow for more reaction time. It is still somewhat subjective, but if I were the coach.....I would say "Keep rolling and moving". OK.....are we clear now? :)
 
Jun 23, 2025
206
558
93
You’re not going to convince me that a guy who has never taken Blaze down is a bad matchup for him. And 1 “Hail Mary” takedown for Marcus > zero takedowns of any kind for Davino.
Davino and Blaze are very close right now. But one team peaks in the regular season and one at nationals. I’m okay with seeing that match at nationals
 

WV lion

All-Conference
Oct 17, 2021
1,236
1,581
113
Yeah. I don't care how the seeds shake out to be honest. I actually hope it's Jax 1. Davino 2 Seidel 3 and Blaze 4. Mix it up with 4 that haven't seen each other yet till tge finals. Let them roll with that and the winner will deserve the title!
Don't count out Ayala. He could sneak a win against some of those guys.
 

js8794

Redshirt
Mar 8, 2026
7
41
0
Agree with him regarding getting to his feet - and his hands off mat, but not sure I agree that they both landed on their back and neither was in a control position. McEnelly returned him to the mat from a rear-standing position and waa in a pretty clear control position as they hit the mat and after they hit the mat. Not sure what "reaction time" had to do with the mat return takedown as they hit before clock expired and McEnelly was clearly in control as they hit the mat and never lost control after hitting mat. Not saying the rule wasn't applied correctly, just saying the rationale doesn't make sense to me if correctly applied.
This. From the time they hit the mat with 1 second left to the time the clock expires, McEnelly was in a control position. The entire time no matter where you stop it.

This is a classic bad official understanding of control (something you used to see mostly only at the lower levels of wrestling). You don't have to completely stop your opponent's movement to be in control. You have to gain control criteria beyond reaction time. Behind both arms, supporting points down, on top for a full second here. Welsh trying and failing to roll underneath does nothing to disrupt McEnelly's control.

Again, I retract the PSU slander. This is only the latest example of this problem, not the entire problem. Next time it may burn you guys and I will be just as mad!