2026 B1G Tourney Session IV Thread

HOA242n!

Junior
Aug 18, 2025
132
343
63
It was fascinating to me watching Barr this season. Often you see guys get to a leg and end up on bottom, and things would sort of stalemate out. But in his case, he was like a dog on a freakin bone and just kept pushing the position til he'd get something.
Very similar with Haines; when he gets in on a leg, he's going to finish...except against Minto. Minto is going to win at least one NCAA championship before he's done, he's a freak athlete and rapidly becoming a better wrestler.

Barr's style is a combination of Haines and Messenbrink. I think the only guy in the country capable of even giving him a match the next two seasons is his backup.
 

PSUbluTX

All-Conference
Feb 7, 2018
290
1,201
93
How did they make a belt with PSU logo so fast after the finals?
They made one in advance for each of the major teams for contingency purposes (except perennial Rutgers). Minnesota’s is on its way to Ethiopia. Iowa’s is in the garbage at the BJC somewhere. Ohio State’s is being mounted prominently on their wall of champs this afternoon.
 

GregPickel

Heisman
Staff member
Jul 25, 2021
43,502
93,401
113
Two notes that I figure are worth sharing:

1. For all the **** Davis gets, he sure seems like a team guy and was the biggest fan of his teammates throughout the finals. He jumped out from that group watching from matside as super supportive.

2. Marcus Blaze had every reason to hang in the back after he lost. Instead after a cooling down period, the podium ceremony, and watching whichever one of his teammates was wrestling at the time, he then came over to sign as many autographs for kids as he could before the next matches started. Thought that was incredibly impressive from a freshman who lost his first Big Ten title chance in tiebreaker.
 

railbirrd

Junior
Nov 1, 2003
131
244
43
Christian said .009 seconds, pretty sure. Honestly didn't know they had time beyond hundredths of a second!

Start at 11:50, it is within 15-20 seconds after.

I editorialized what CP said. I cannot believe the wrestling/mat clocks go down to more than a tenth of a second. Ie, they don't go to hundreths of a second, like for example in the 100-m dash.
 
Jun 26, 2025
872
763
93
Official told CPyles the clock was at .9 seconds when Rocco first hit the mat, then by the time he settled in, time had expired.

By the time he settled in - wth does that mean? McEnelly clearly was in control of Welsh when he lifted him and returned him to the mat. He remained in control through hitting the mat - Walsh never separated from McEnelly during the mat return so i'm not sure what is meant when the Ref says "by the time he settled in".... he never lost control of Welsh at any moment of the mat return including after they hit the mat.
 

Hockeygod11

Junior
Jan 29, 2006
124
243
43
I am guessing.. and only a guess.. what they mean is there are times when they hit the mat and the wrestler being taken to the mat is able to roll thru and negate the take down.. A match like Bartlett and Mendez from a couple years ago comes to mind.. not a slam.. but Bartlett had Mendez dead to rights.. if the ref calls the takedown as soon as Mendez hit the mat Bartlett is the winner but he rolled thru and came out behind and won.. Mendez did.. so in this case.. I don't think it is the second Welsh hits the mat.. but rather when it is clear McEnelly is in control and Rocco isn't going to roll thru etc.. Just guessing what they meant..
 

Aardvark86

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
1,002
1,748
93
By the time he settled in - wth does that mean? McEnelly clearly was in control of Welsh when he lifted him and returned him to the mat. He remained in control through hitting the mat - Walsh never separated from McEnelly during the mat return so i'm not sure what is meant when the Ref says "by the time he settled in".... he never lost control of Welsh at any moment of the mat return including after they hit the mat.
This is sorta my question from earlier. Does the “reaction time” clock start when they’re both standing and no one has been “taken down” to the mat yet? Per Bausch podcast Rocco is in the air at 1.0.
 

Sunshine88!

All-Conference
Sep 26, 2025
1,567
2,273
113
PJ Duke reminds me of Cary Kolat, he wants to hurt people.
He needs reminded to wrestle mean and nasty against everyone and he will never lose at Nationals. That’s the key for PJ. Promise you Taylor will focus on PJs underhook now
 

Tom McAndrew

BWI Staff
Staff member
Oct 27, 2021
75,913
60,016
113
I am guessing.. and only a guess.. what they mean is there are times when they hit the mat and the wrestler being taken to the mat is able to roll thru and negate the take down.. A match like Bartlett and Mendez from a couple years ago comes to mind.. not a slam.. but Bartlett had Mendez dead to rights.. if the ref calls the takedown as soon as Mendez hit the mat Bartlett is the winner but he rolled thru and came out behind and won.. Mendez did.. so in this case.. I don't think it is the second Welsh hits the mat.. but rather when it is clear McEnelly is in control and Rocco isn't going to roll thru etc.. Just guessing what they meant..

A good guess. If the offensive wrestler lifts a wrestler off the mat, they do not attain a TD the instant the defensive wrestler is returned to the mat.

Too many of you are parsing statements, or looking at portions of a rule.

I keep trying to steer folks toward looking at TDs from the perspective of establishing control. That's the key component. Yes, there are things like boundary lines, covering hips, or getting a second leg, etc. that all come in to play. But if all the criteria are met, then the offensive wrestler also has to establish control. At the point when that is established, and all other relevant criteria for that situation are met, then a TD can be awarded.
 

railbirrd

Junior
Nov 1, 2003
131
244
43
By the time he settled in - wth does that mean? McEnelly clearly was in control of Welsh when he lifted him and returned him to the mat. He remained in control through hitting the mat - Walsh never separated from McEnelly during the mat return so i'm not sure what is meant when the Ref says "by the time he settled in".... he never lost control of Welsh at any moment of the mat return including after they hit the mat.
sorry I didn't quote Pyles exactly. To spare further back and forth here, take a listen for yourself. God bless.
 
Jun 26, 2025
872
763
93
I am guessing.. and only a guess.. what they mean is there are times when they hit the mat and the wrestler being taken to the mat is able to roll thru and negate the take down.. A match like Bartlett and Mendez from a couple years ago comes to mind.. not a slam.. but Bartlett had Mendez dead to rights.. if the ref calls the takedown as soon as Mendez hit the mat Bartlett is the winner but he rolled thru and came out behind and won.. Mendez did.. so in this case.. I don't think it is the second Welsh hits the mat.. but rather when it is clear McEnelly is in control and Rocco isn't going to roll thru etc.. Just guessing what they meant..

So you're saying it's impossible to have a TD under 2 seconds due to "reaction time"??? (i.e., reaction time automatically saves you under 2 seconds on the clock). Because I'm somewhat confused by your example as it is completely non-analogus as Mendez created separation vs BB when thet hit the mat (and got one of BB's legs if I remember correctly), but McEnelly never lost complete control of Welsh from the time he lifted him in the rear-standing position to when he planted him on the mat - no separation, never lost his thight-waist and complete control of him. The two are not analogous imo.
 

Psalm 1 guy

All-Conference
Nov 3, 2019
941
3,534
93
On the Davino freshman of the year award, my family was arguing the Davino got the revenge win over the undefeated Blaze and 133 is the toughest weight class. First, I believe 157 was a tougher road for Duke than 133 was for Davino and I believe 157 in the B1G is probably stronger than 133 is. this year. Second, a revenge win over the reigning national champ by major decision is better than a ride out win over a true freshman. So I think it's safe to say it was an anti-PSU bias.

On Duke: there was a stretch of matches where he didn't look himself to me, including the Nebraska match. I was wondering if he was significantly dinged up. During his post-match interview, he referred to being better physically now.
I caught that, too. Physically, he looked so much better than in his first match with Taylor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SlipperyPete

Matter7172

Senior
Oct 30, 2021
225
769
83
Pretty sure there was one year Rutgers had 10 qualified for NCAAs. Matter, you remember which year?
It may have been 2016. They came in 5th at B1Gs (106.5 points), which remains their high water mark. They had one champ, two 3/4s, five 5/6s and two 7/8s. So that would seem to be 10 qualifiers for NCAAs. However, most Rutgers fans think I'm delusional about the lack of progress for their program under Goodale. I am still fairly certain that if your program's best year was over 10 years ago, you have lost ground over that time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nitlion1986

Kingslayer

Junior
Nov 3, 2016
117
255
63
A good guess. If the offensive wrestler lifts a wrestler off the mat, they do not attain a TD the instant the defensive wrestler is returned to the mat.

Too many of you are parsing statements, or looking at portions of a rule.

I keep trying to steer folks toward looking at TDs from the perspective of establishing control. That's the key component. Yes, there are things like boundary lines, covering hips, or getting a second leg, etc. that all come in to play. But if all the criteria are met, then the offensive wrestler also has to establish control. At the point when that is established, and all other relevant criteria for that situation are met, then a TD can be awarded.
I really appreciate what you bring as far as knowledge and understanding of the rules but it seems in this case it is a bit subjective what establishing control means . I am convinced that control was established and seems like there are a few others while there is a good portion who feel it wasn’t . It is what it is and perfect example of agreeing to disagree.
 

Nitlion1986

All-Conference
Apr 13, 2024
1,245
3,741
113
It may have been 2016. They came in 5th at B1Gs (106.5 points), which remains their high water mark. They had one champ, two 3/4s, five 5/6s and two 7/8s. So that would seem to be 10 qualifiers for NCAAs. However, most Rutgers fans think I'm delusional about the lack of progress for their program under Goodale. I am still fairly certain that if your program's best year was over 10 years ago, you have lost ground over that time.
With the exception of Cael, Casey and Cody Rutgers has the same advantages as PSU. Location relative to recruits, a loyal fan base that would expand measurably with success and a large alumni with money.
 

Matter7172

Senior
Oct 30, 2021
225
769
83
With the exception of Cael, Casey and Cody Rutgers has the same advantages as PSU. Location relative to recruits, a loyal fan base that would expand measurably with success and a large alumni with money.
I agree. But they lost me as a season ticket holder (and a lot of other fans) with their regression on the mat, their lost of the best part of their coaching staff, their failure to adequately replace them and their rapacious parking policy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nitlion1986

Aardvark86

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
1,002
1,748
93
A good guess. If the offensive wrestler lifts a wrestler off the mat, they do not attain a TD the instant the defensive wrestler is returned to the mat.

Too many of you are parsing statements, or looking at portions of a rule.

I keep trying to steer folks toward looking at TDs from the perspective of establishing control. That's the key component. Yes, there are things like boundary lines, covering hips, or getting a second leg, etc. that all come in to play. But if all the criteria are met, then the offensive wrestler also has to establish control. At the point when that is established, and all other relevant criteria for that situation are met, then a TD can be awarded.
Go figure - actually looking at the text of the rule was enlightening:

It is not simply “gains control” of the opponent, but “gains control by taking the opponent to the mat in bounds and beyond reaction time”.
And reaction time is in the discretion of the ref but not instantaneous. Hard to quibble with a no takedown call where total time on the mat is somewhere south of one second. At the very least, hard to quibble with not overturning such a call

thanks for your patience tom. As a lawyer, I should have known to actually read the rule.
 

Dogwelder

All-Conference
Aug 1, 2013
621
2,109
93
With the exception of Cael, Casey and Cody Rutgers has the same advantages as PSU. Location relative to recruits, a loyal fan base that would expand measurably with success and a large alumni with money.
Does Rutgers have alumni $upport? That’s a very important ingredient.
 

RubberKnee

Redshirt
Nov 21, 2023
6
9
3
He can win that way, he just can't win consistently.
I'd say he's been winning that way in big matches for a while, that's pretty consistent. Wrestling that style is gonna bite you in the *** every once in a while. You are in there with another elite athlete
PJ with a major!! Wow. That’s as good as I’ve ever seen h
I see how PJ makes weight so easy. His family doesn't leave much food around.

Awesome performance by PJ. Did Shapiro win his tournament? Who's the 1 if he did?
Does it even matter...could be a T-Rex and if that PJ shows up...is there a hotline for battered former Apex predators?
 

Aardvark86

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
1,002
1,748
93
Also, PJ reportedly has a hard cut. On Sunday, he had ~ 7 hours to refuel (plus the additional one pound weight allowance). I'd guess he weighed closer to 165 than 157 by time he took the mat.
I know, WAAAAAAAY too cart-before-the-horse, but an interesting and amusing thought just popped into my head after reading this, re: next year's roster: Mitch v. Minto?
 
Last edited:

STL_Lion

Freshman
Jan 30, 2002
62
77
18
By the time he settled in - wth does that mean? McEnelly clearly was in control of Welsh when he lifted him and returned him to the mat. He remained in control through hitting the mat - Walsh never separated from McEnelly during the mat return so i'm not sure what is meant when the Ref says "by the time he settled in".... he never lost control of Welsh at any moment of the mat return including after they hit the mat.
Check post #922
53:40 - 184lbs and Rocco vs Max
you will get a good explanation from people who know wrestling and the rules
 

Dren007

Junior
Feb 19, 2012
166
326
63
Does anyone know what the celebration thing MM he does at the end. I'm sure it's something hip & cool that I am not aware of.