Because nobody is claiming Cochran will win NCAA, they're wondering out loud if he can win the Southern Scuffle. The person who claimed it's possible started his prediction with "Am I crazy" to think he will and someone cited why they think Cochran can with a good win over Slavikouski when he was still a 197.
And now you're the one trying to discredit Cochran's win as not a good one because a one off result against Gable.
Let's also not act like a broken hand is the same as a torn shoulder. Guys routinely have their hands taped and wrapped and seemingly don't miss a beat.
No they're not. They're saying out loud that he's the favorite and should win, and sugar-coating it with "am I crazy to think this?". (BTW, anybody who asks that question already knows the answer.)
This is no different from people thinking Cochran is a better HWT option than Mirasola despite losing to Mirasola every time and weighing almost exactly the same. Shiny toy.
You're also putting words into my mouth. I never said Cochran's win wasn't a good one. I have always said it's poor standalone evidence of his future success for a lot of reasons -- primarily because duals are easier than tournaments, secondarily about Slavikouski's limitations -- let's face it, he wasn't exactly Michael Beard out there scoring points left and right.
Speaking of Beard, that same year Cochran got crushed by Beard and Cardenas. Those don't matter at least as much?
But yeah, it's just the Scuffle. Apparently I need to re-re-repeat myself: he can win this. He's not the favorite but can win.