Cignetti probably wanted himHe’s already been in college seven years.![]()
Cignetti probably wanted himHe’s already been in college seven years.![]()
Which is still four years less than Sean Clifford.He’s already been in college seven years.![]()
Just switched to DT in 2024. Was an OL player prior to that. The size is impressive…as long as they can play.Which is still four years less than Sean Clifford.
But in all seriousness, another very large DT. I have seen this one listed between 310 and 335.
It’s fascinating to watch the emphasis Campbell and Lynn place on size on this reconstructed defense.Just switched to DT in 2024. Was an OL player prior to that. The size is impressive…as long as they can play.
"Seven years of college down the drain." John Blutarsky.He’s already been in college seven years.![]()
Best seven years of his life.Seven years of college down the drain.
Yes. I really don’t get too wrapped up in that. I just want players. Guys that have a motor and drive to be the best.It’s fascinating to watch the emphasis Campbell and Lynn place on size on this reconstructed defense.
I just want football players.Yes. I really don’t get too wrapped up in that. I just want players. Guys that have a motor and drive to be the best.
Should have its own thread. I couldn't care less about it.Can we please disperse with the "Williams" chatter on this string? Trying to follow the Nits portal moves.
I’m totally confused as to why there’s only this one portal thread and it’s littered with posts about players with no connection to PSU. If there is a generic one fine, but there should be a dedicated thread to PSU portal moves. Heck I’d love to see a separate PSU incoming vs outgoing player threadShould have its own thread. I couldn't care less about it.
There is definitely inconsistencies with the monitoring of this board.Should have its own thread. I couldn't care less about it.
He just got tenure.He’s already been in college seven years.![]()
College football IS professional football.Cignetti probably wanted him
Its worse. They have contracts.College football IS professional football.
Normally do not agree with him, but he is spot on here…
Correct and it was for a long time, some just didn't know it or want to admit it. The next step is to setup actual REAL rules for all involved and govern it correctly this time.College football IS professional football.
Good post. And I would argue it has been professional football since at least the 1980s. You’re right that the schools brought this on themselves.Correct and it was for a long time, some just didn't know it or want to admit it. The next step is to setup actual REAL rules for all involved and govern it correctly this time.
The problem the last few decades were the old men lining their pockets at the NCAA for looking away, conference commissioners with hands out for $$$'s from TV, and the schools themselves who just whistled and looked up at the sky like everything is just fine. The players finally realized they too can get a slice so now regulate that slice with an actual cap for ALL and make the punishments so severe that if you do get caught slipping players side cash again you get dismantle for a year or two.....you know actually enforce the rules this time instead of just collecting checks from the Networks.
What changed everything is TV coverage and subsequent revenue to the schools. In the 70’s very few programs had games broadcast on TV. IIRC, ABC was the only national broadcaster that showed games and unless it was a marquee matchup, there was no television. You had to listen to the game on the radio or go in person to the game. If you were a big, well known program you might get 2 games a season televised. Most football revenue was based on game attendance (ticket sales, concessions, parking, etc.).Good post. And I would argue it has been professional football since at least the 1980s. You’re right that the schools brought this on themselves.
Correct and it was for a long time, some just didn't know it or want to admit it. The next step is to setup actual REAL rules for all involved and govern it correctly this time.
The problem the last few decades were the old men lining their pockets at the NCAA for looking away, conference commissioners with hands out for $$$'s from TV, and the schools themselves who just whistled and looked up at the sky like everything is just fine. The players finally realized they too can get a slice so now regulate that slice with an actual cap for ALL and make the punishments so severe that if you do get caught slipping players side cash again you get dismantle for a year or two.....you know actually enforce the rules this time instead of just collecting checks from the Networks.
Huhhh, who is most of you? I'm not seeing some majority here kick and scream to leave the B1G right now. You sure like to project a lot and asking a professional sport to be governed isn't some outlandish idea.Won't work. Most of you want to drop the b10 because of their rules. You wanted emert gone because of rules.
When The rules don't go your way you will complain.
Ps. The sec will always break whatever rules are in place.
Its been an issue with PSU for several years. Too many times we have seen, in critical times in contested games, the defense being unable to stop the run. I hope I never have to see another game where a team (Michigan and OSU) did not have to throw a single pass to march up and down the field.It’s fascinating to watch the emphasis Campbell and Lynn place on size on this reconstructed defense.
Agree, but size matters. You can be an exceptional football player, with a high end motor, but to play in the interior of the line (both sides) requires heft. Past recruiting overvalued twitch versus heft. You need space eaters so that your second level can play clean (clean as possible),I just want football players.
Problem is under the current construct you can't institute a cap or anything that limits players abilities to get paid. As soon as you try it guess what your going to court and lose the courts have already set the precedent that NCAA cannot stop players form getting paid. Only way to change it is to have a CBA, which would require players to become employees and then the players and league can negotiate a contract.Correct and it was for a long time, some just didn't know it or want to admit it. The next step is to setup actual REAL rules for all involved and govern it correctly this time.
The problem the last few decades were the old men lining their pockets as the NCAA was looking away, conference commissioners with hands out for $$$'s from TV, and the schools themselves who just whistled and looked up at the sky like everything is just fine. The players finally realized they too can get a slice so now regulate that slice with an actual cap for ALL and make the punishments so severe that if you do get caught slipping players side cash again you get dismantle them for a year or two.....you know actually enforce the rules this time instead of just collecting checks from the Networks.
Indiana is not a unicorn, nor will Cignetti star chase with or without money. Cignetti is the first to truly master the new landscape of college football. He understands that: 1. your are only assured of keeping a player for one year; they can transfer every year. So, he pays for production, not potential. 2. He also values players who fit his system; not those with the most talent. His blue-chip ratio in in year two was 8%. Ole Miss' bllue chip ratio was 40% or 19th nationally. Alabama was at 73% and looked like as*.Easier said than done. How many teams are filling their rosters with lower star players and lower paydays that did not make the playoffs. Indiana is the exception and basically a unicorn. I can assure you Indiana will be spending Cuban’s $ on filling their future roster with high star players. Recruiting talent first and hoping the talent develops into a team is the best way to ensure college football success.
DT Dallas Vakalahi is a 24 year old true junior. Per Tengwall this is because he spent a few years on a mission trip to Philadelphia. Personally, I think he must be one brave dude to do a mission trip in Philadelphia ! Edit - sorry I missed CaliLion’s message thread on this video.
Great DT make an avg LB look like a star. Even Deluca would have looked better with having these huge 300+ lb guys in front of him. Then when the LB can play back an extra yard, or play wider an extra yard because the DT will be able to hold the OL for an extra second so that the RB has to slow down or make a move, the S can play back a bit as well and then they have better angles.Agree, but size matters. You can be an exceptional football player, with a high end motor, but to play in the interior of the line (both sides) requires heft. Past recruiting overvalued twitch versus heft. You need space eaters so that your second level can play clean (clean as possible),
I like size too.Agree, but size matters. You can be an exceptional football player, with a high end motor, but to play in the interior of the line (both sides) requires heft. Past recruiting overvalued twitch versus heft. You need space eaters so that your second level can play clean (clean as possible),