MeanDog, respectfully, have to disagree with you. Burns did not beat themselves, and neither did Shelby. Lincolnton beat both team by playing hard and making a good effort. For the first quarter and a half the wolves could hardly do anything and faced a 21-7 deficit, along a with Burns defense that literally stuffed us.
Lincolnton also held M. Davis, who I believe is one of the best fullbacks, and all-purpose players on this side of the state, to under a hundred yards rushing; then held the Bulldogs to under 200 yards rushing for the night. In my mind, that is a major task.
As far as turnovers, Our guys had a lot to do with that, too. We swarmed to the ball and were able to cover good receivers like J. Ussery and R Wells which is not easy.
As far as Shelby, we made a great effort against another good team. Lincolnton took the lead away from the Lions three different times. Shelby relies on the pass, a lot, and had over two hundred yards against us, but their longest completion was around 25 yards, and they have a stable of good receivers like Roseboro, Williams and Collins, who would be hard for any team in this classification to cover. The wolves held J. Tait, another really good fullback to under a hundred yards. This may not be unusual against other teams, but against us, he had over 25 carries.
Speaking of turnovers, they're part of the game and can be brought on by a good defensive effort, I know you know, but just wanted to say it.
About Lincolnton's loss to S. Cramer, it was their night, they won by beating us in every way. Not my style to give reasons why we lost (and I believe it's fine for someone to say why they think their/our team lost, but that's them and not me). As far as opinion, would we beat Burn or Shelby if we played them again, this year, I'm not sure, but we are capable of it, we proved it.