Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Bell Tolls for Thee" data-source="post: 131815709" data-attributes="member: 1812660">He conflates his personal feelings about Stewart the man with his job as a head coach.&nbsp; He's biased and refuses to defend his assertions or explain his hypocrisy.&nbsp; He gives Stewart the lion's share of credit for beating Oklahoma in 2007 over RR, but also gives Stewart the lion's share of credit for beating Clemson in 2011 over Holgorsen.&nbsp; Not a word to explain why these very similar cases warrant the complete opposite opinion.&nbsp; Not a word about taking an offensive unit in 2007 that averaged 38.9 ppg and dropped 48 on Oklahoma to a unit that averaged 24 ppg and lost to a 5-7 Colorado team by only putting up 14 points.&nbsp; Not a word about a 2010 offensive unit which averaged 26.7 ppg and only managed 13, 14, and 7 vs UConn, Syracuse, and NC State respectively.&nbsp; Nor a word about the &quot;vastly inferior to Stewart&quot; HC Holgorsen taking that same unit to a 34.9 ppg average and putting 70 on Clemson.Ultimately, mofo came at me as though I was wrong when pointing out that Stewart's flaws which would prevent him from producing Nehlen or RR level results were apparent in his 3rd season.&nbsp; I've explained why that is true which mofo doesn't refute because he is &quot;bored&quot; and countered his reductive &quot;stomped Oklahoma&quot;, &quot;beat Auburn&quot;, and &quot;28-12.&quot;&nbsp; All of which I've refuted extensively.&nbsp; Stewart, purely as a productive head football coach, was much closer in quality to Brown (so far) and Holgorsen than to RR or Nehlen.&nbsp; If you want to say I'm wrong, at least provide reasons as to why my arguments are wrong.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The Bell Tolls for Thee, post: 131815709, member: 1812660"] He conflates his personal feelings about Stewart the man with his job as a head coach. He's biased and refuses to defend his assertions or explain his hypocrisy. He gives Stewart the lion's share of credit for beating Oklahoma in 2007 over RR, but also gives Stewart the lion's share of credit for beating Clemson in 2011 over Holgorsen. Not a word to explain why these very similar cases warrant the complete opposite opinion. Not a word about taking an offensive unit in 2007 that averaged 38.9 ppg and dropped 48 on Oklahoma to a unit that averaged 24 ppg and lost to a 5-7 Colorado team by only putting up 14 points. Not a word about a 2010 offensive unit which averaged 26.7 ppg and only managed 13, 14, and 7 vs UConn, Syracuse, and NC State respectively. Nor a word about the "vastly inferior to Stewart" HC Holgorsen taking that same unit to a 34.9 ppg average and putting 70 on Clemson. Ultimately, mofo came at me as though I was wrong when pointing out that Stewart's flaws which would prevent him from producing Nehlen or RR level results were apparent in his 3rd season. I've explained why that is true which mofo doesn't refute because he is "bored" and countered his reductive "stomped Oklahoma", "beat Auburn", and "28-12." All of which I've refuted extensively. Stewart, purely as a productive head football coach, was much closer in quality to Brown (so far) and Holgorsen than to RR or Nehlen. If you want to say I'm wrong, at least provide reasons as to why my arguments are wrong. [/QUOTE]

Name