<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small; ">What likely minimal ranking would a team need to be in order to average less than 1 loss per year against an average SOS of 90?</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small; ">
</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small; ">
</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small; ">Clearly, there's been never-ending discussion regarding Boise State, TCU & Utah, much of it centering around their domination year-in-year-out, albeit against a softer SOS, and their subsequent exclusion form the NC.</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small; ">
</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small; ">
</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small; ">Those who want them excluded argue the soft SOS. Can someone actually come up with a reasonable formula for determining the expected rank required for a team to, not just be favored against an average SOS in the 90's, but dominate it year after year with fewer than 1-loss per year. I would imagine a legitimate, accurate formula would also need to give some weight to the 1 -3 teams on the schedule that are legitimate threats.</span>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small; ">
</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small; ">615dawg, wanna take a shot?</span></div>