ABC: Comey will not say Trump obstructed justice

Dec 7, 2010
20,602
120
0
Actually the Senate votes to convict, not decide "innocence". Then the full Congress votes to remove him from Office.

"Innocence" can only be proven in a court of Law because a citizen is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Congress is not a court of Law, it's one of the three governing branches and they vote to remove the Executive from office for not upholding his duty under the Constitution by committing treason or other high crimes or misdemeanors.

His "innocence" is never in question under an impeachment. It's his malfeasance in Office.
You are so stupid.
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
80,050
1,981
113
You are so stupid.

Really RPJ?
...compare what the Constitution proscribes to what YOU posted and then hold that mirror up for you to look into:

The Constitution only discusses impeachment procedure in 3 clauses in Article I—§ 2 Clause 5 and § 3 Clauses 6 and 7:

§ 2, Clause 5: The House of Representatives . . . have the sole Power of Impeachment.



§ 3, Clause 6: The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.



§ 3, Clause 7: Judgment in Cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.

So tell me RPJ since you're so "smart". Where does it say anything in there about "innocence"? As I read that it's either "guilt" or "non guilt". Not innocence.

"smart" RPJ wrote in post #37 of this thread:
quote: "The Senate decides innocence or guilt of the charges (impeachment) brought by the House.

And you claim I'm "stupid"?

link:
https://lawfareblog.com/premature-primer-how-do-impeachment-proceedings-actually-work
 
Last edited:

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,573
756
113
Was it 2 weeks ago that a certain poster kept pointing out that Comey would teatify and that would be the end of Trump. Seems his tune changed.
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,095
686
0
it's the same Constitution that impeached Bill Clinton...

just sayin'....

 

WVUBRU

Freshman
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
You just responded to him again dipshit
LMAO. Ok, rog has long been known to be dumber than a rock. Let me explain. When somebody responds to a post, one gets notified. Most of the time, i click on it to see it unless it is from a totally worthless individual which you and THE are not. But on a daily basis, I don't open many threads and definitely don't read BS from posters with zero credibility which you are also one. Any moron that maintains Daniel Boone is the greatest WVian has less than zero.

Now, go back kissing Trump's ***.
 

TarHeelEer

Redshirt
Dec 15, 2002
89,286
37
48
Not replying to him so he won't feel the need to respond to someone he doesn't talk to. I don't receive notifications on every fracking reply, I turned that crap off. Moron.
 

rog1187

All-American
May 29, 2001
69,774
5,023
113
Not replying to him so he won't feel the need to respond to someone he doesn't talk to. I don't receive notifications on every fracking reply, I turned that crap off. Moron.
We all receive notifications...doesn't mean you have to reply...he just can't resist.

He either has a poor memory or is a liar...my Boone comments was not that he was the greatest WVian...Doc in his usual persona embellished (our outright lied) what I said. But then again Doc was touting that the black-hating-white-sheet-wearing-cross-burning-KKK-grand-dragon Byrd was the greatest so I'm not surprised.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,693
1,764
113
We all receive notifications...doesn't mean you have to reply...he just can't resist.

He either has a poor memory or is a liar...my Boone comments was not that he was the greatest WVian...Doc in his usual persona embellished (our outright lied) what I said. But then again Doc was touting that the black-hating-white-sheet-wearing-cross-burning-KKK-grand-dragon Byrd was the greatest so I'm not surprised.
You can turn that stuff off.
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Here's a little help. The Senate doesn't impeach.
You pulled the trigger too fast. He was beginning to draw a cheering squad of those equally adept. Was getting to be really funny. Then, they will scream and raise hell in attempt to change the subject. They are poor losers, but they are losers.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
You pulled the trigger too fast. He was beginning to draw a cheering squad of those equally adept. Was getting to be really funny. Then, they will scream and raise hell in attempt to change the subject. They are poor losers, but they are losers.

You're welcome to point out anywhere in this thread where I said the Senate impeaches. That goes for any of you trump cuckholders.
 

TarHeelEer

Redshirt
Dec 15, 2002
89,286
37
48
You're welcome to point out anywhere in this thread where I said the Senate impeaches. That goes for any of you trump cuckholders.

Again, that's not what you said. You're changing your wrongness.

It is also up to the Senate to decide, based on his testimony and all other evidence, whether impeachment is appropriate or not

By the time the Senate looks at it, said person is already impeached.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
I wonder how many people will notice the absurdity of Trump stating in a termination letter that he appreciates Comey telling him on three separate occasions that he's not under investigation once Comey says he never gave that assurance to Trump at all (as if though the absurdity isn't painfully obvious already). Then that termination letter got to the press pretty quickly didn't it?
 

TarHeelEer

Redshirt
Dec 15, 2002
89,286
37
48
I wonder how many people will notice the absurdity of Trump stating in a termination letter that he appreciates Comey telling him on three separate occasions that he's not under investigation once Comey says he never gave that assurance to Trump at all (as if though the absurdity isn't painfully obvious already). Then that termination letter got to the press pretty quickly didn't it?

I find it absurd that lefties are whining that Trump fired him after they themselves were calling for him to be fired for months.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
I find it absurd that lefties are whining that Trump fired him after they themselves were calling for him to be fired for months.

I have two problems with the firing. 1) the timing. Why wait from January 20 until May 9, 3 1/2 months? If he didn't like his "ineffective leadership", he should have fired him on January 21.
2) in trump's interview with Lester Holt, he said the firing was because of Russia. The letter stated otherwise. His lies didn't match.
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
It's not Comey's place to make that determination. Comey's role is to testify. It is up to a prosecutor to determine if obstruction occurred. It is also up to the Senate to decide, based on his testimony and all other evidence, whether impeachment is appropriate or not and potentially at a later date, if more evidence surfaces.
**********, the House decides on impeachment before Senate gets involved in the process.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Morons[/QUOTE]
Senate has no roll in the process if House does not impeach

You're wasting your time. I have found over the years that libs simply do not understand the Constitution or the role of the various branches of government. That is partly why they believe in a judiciary that makes new law.
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0


You're wasting your time. I have found over the years that libs simply do not understand the Constitution or the role of the various branches of government. That is partly why they believe in a judiciary that makes new law.[/QUOTE]
You are right, they don't understand very and even what they understand, they will stretch facts. When they quit showing their stupidity, they will quit responding to the subject. When they quit responding, I find that to be admission of their lie. Tale-tale evidence of their giving up on their position. And, "they are good boys" just hanging with wrong crowd.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
You are right, they don't understand very and even what they understand, they will stretch facts. When they quit showing their stupidity, they will quit responding to the subject. When they quit responding, I find that to be admission of their lie. Tale-tale evidence of their giving up on their position. And, "they are good boys" just hanging with wrong crowd.

Go on. I like this story. It is humorous.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Go on. I like this story. It is humorous.

LOL. You're the one that thought that since Comey kept notes, he was in effect notifying himself of Trump's obstruction. What an absurd position to take and is simply wrong. You copied and pasted the statute but did not understand what you copied.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
LOL. You're the one that thought that since Comey kept notes, he was in effect notifying himself of Trump's obstruction. What an absurd position to take and is simply wrong. You copied and pasted the statute but did not understand what you copied.

That's not what I said at all. It's not surprising that was your take away.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
That's not what I said at all. It's not surprising that was your take away.

Read your comments. It is exactly what you implied. Exactly.

"Hahahahahaha ha."

"He was someone in authority at the time. Thanks for proving my point."

You are certainly implying that his notes (Comey) document that he told someone in authority (himself) because he wrote notes to himself.
 
Last edited: