Addie Deal enters transfer portal

IowaCityLit

All-Conference
Aug 30, 2025
823
1,511
93
Mallegni possibly, given that her boyfriend just passed way. Maybe she'd want a fresh start.
She’s another player I expected to develop more. Obviously a lot of personal stuff she’s dealing with.

But she had flashes as a frosh that made me think she could develop into a reliable shooter/scorer for Iowa. Decent size too.
 

SB_SB

All-Conference
Dec 17, 2022
1,424
2,520
113
???? "Drive to the basket consistently" What? She played like one game (early in the year) where she showed something. The rest of her time was meh.. Never played in a B1G game. So your saying she'd have done that against UCLA, USC, Michigan, etc...?
I’m saying she was brought in for that. We didn’t have anyone capable of driving once she quit. I don’t know how successful she would have been but she was the only hope.
 

Hawkpunts40

Sophomore
Jan 27, 2025
41
108
32
This was to be expected, but sad none the least. I have a good friend, a former WBB player who is at every game in the front row. She told me last week this would happen. According to her, Addie and her family were told that Iowa would run an up tempo style offense and nothing could be further from the truth. Addie's family felt as though JJ was not honest with them. I have met the Deal's and they are a wonderful family who loved what Iowa was selling, but they felt the sales job was not a reality. Don't be surprised if Addie ends up at UCLA, Minnesota or Ohio State. I will add that the Deals have spoken with the Woliczko's. Acknowledging that Addie definitely needs more work, JJ can't create an environment where 5 star players walk away. It is a bad look.
I didn’t really see anything out of Deal that made me think playing style was holding her back from shining. She’s not very quick.

I also think it’s a bit ironic if the Deals are upset on what JJ sold the program as. I could say the same thing the other way. I’m sure Iowa thought it was getting an immediate impact player and probably paid her as such. Instead we got a normal 3* recruit.

To the people saying we can’t lose 5* players, it doesn’t sound like it came down to money but if a 5* recruit gets paid 5* money and doesn’t perform, should you keep overpaying them. They probably aren’t eager to take a pay cut.
 

jhoosh43

Junior
Jun 24, 2024
122
284
63
She’s another player I expected to develop more. Obviously a lot of personal stuff she’s dealing with.

But she had flashes as a frosh that made me think she could develop into a reliable shooter/scorer for Iowa. Decent size too.
I was hoping she would be similar to Warnock, seemed to have a bit more bounce and length despite them being the same height. Warnock could get hot from 3, Mallegni is apparently only lights out in practice.
 

SB_SB

All-Conference
Dec 17, 2022
1,424
2,520
113
I'll tell you what. Lets table this and see what happens in the portal, (both in and out), and what the team looks like next season. Especially if MW did back out, and see if its a big deal or not. Its funny when you look back all the games Deal played really well in she played at least 18 minutes and got comfortable. You can say what you want about earning playing time, but Jan botched managing Deal, and anyone who things she's not capable of ending up a really good player, I'll just disagree. As to who played instead of her in the games we lost, most all of the guards played like crap in most of those games, not just Deal. That sounds more like a systematic problem then it just being on one freshman player.
It doesn’t matter who we get or don’t get next year. You play for this year, not next year. AD was not as good as expected. Maybe next year she’ll be better but that’s next year.
 

Row55

Freshman
Feb 22, 2009
40
65
18
Levin surprised me, I thought she'd be content to be depth off the bench at Iowa. Guessing she could walk in and start in Ames, but sure hope she doesn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TruthSerium

onionman1

Junior
Jul 1, 2025
138
210
43
Entitled player who expected to either start or play major minutes in big games despite consistently making bad passes and turning the ball over in key moments in big games Lights were too bright for her here, unless they’d have let her spot up and do nothing but shoot. Maybe she’ll land at a spot where they just need a shooter and not a ball handler? She could be decent in a system like that.
 

citizenHawk1

Senior
Jul 10, 2025
222
551
93
I mean I get trying to leverage Ava as much as possible. She’s great. But it seemed like JJ had no other options offensively. I worry JJ over relies on one player (Lucy, Ava) cause she doesn’t have a creative or free-flowing offense with balance.
No shooters in the guard court. They played the hand they had, which was to get the ball low. Quit pretending they weren't 27-7 (and projected 5th in the conference).
 

Hawkpunts40

Sophomore
Jan 27, 2025
41
108
32
She’s another player I expected to develop more. Obviously a lot of personal stuff she’s dealing with.

But she had flashes as a frosh that made me think she could develop into a reliable shooter/scorer for Iowa. Decent size too.
Me and you must just see the game differently. I disagreed with you on Deal being underutilized and I feel the opposite on Mallegni. When she came in as a frosh, I feel like she was chucking up 3s like she had Peter Jok accuracy but would miss them all. Looked up her 3pt percentage to confirm: 23% last yr, 15% this yr.
 

Hawkpunts40

Sophomore
Jan 27, 2025
41
108
32
Jan’s offense is hot garbage. I can guarantee you not a lot of girls will want to play rainbow pass to the post and hope you don’t turn it over offense.
I wonder how much of that is that we have an elite center in Ava and didn’t have great guard play. JJ did say she wanted Chat to shoot more. I was super frustrated with some of the forced passes to the post but didn’t help in the tourney when our guards couldn’t make a shot.

I know the tourney is what matters in college basketball but people seem to forget we were a top 10 team this year, #2 in B1G. Clearly something was working.
 

IowaCityLit

All-Conference
Aug 30, 2025
823
1,511
93
No shooters in the guard court. They played the hand they had, which was to get the ball low. Quit pretending they weren't 27-7 (and projected 5th in the conference).
JJ built the roster with no guard depth and shooters. She overachieved with a roster she put together.

Gonna have to do it again next year after missing out on big time guard recruits.
 
Feb 25, 2008
30,472
28,322
113
You seem like you might be a family member or a close friend. When we lost ER the team lost the ability to drive to the basket consistently. That really hurt the team because there was very little opportunity to break down the defense and cause open shooters.
Losing Emely was a far bigger deal than losing Taylor even though that effectively ended our legitimate ability to space the floor with a reliable 3 pt shooter.

Everything we did after that was smoke and mirrors and Jan and her staff deserve credit for that.

But you can also mitigate that with guards that can break down a defense, force help and find the open teammate. Chit Chat certainly has the ability, but the lack of size against the tall trees will always impact her effectiveness, and it was very evident towards the end of the season.

Emely had a little more size and aggressiveness attacking the basket. Her problem was that she couldn't reel it in so that her aggressiveness didn't become a detriment. And Jan also needed to be able to do a better job of being able to reel that in as well.

Unfortunately, we probably won't get to see if that'll play out because I expect Emely to be another one of the transfers.
 

Bunsen82

All-American
May 6, 2004
2,851
5,112
113
Are you related to Jan or something? Why do you constantly defend her? She gets paid well to do a job and elevate the program. Name one thing she has improved upon since she took over?
Easy- defense. And no I am not related. You get mad because I knock down rumor mill crap. FYI- I’ve been watching wbb regularly since 2002-2003. First off was in the pep band. I was effectively relegated to the wbb gigs and enjoyed it.

I could argue Remmerde was as a big a name back in the day. We use to joke about AIRBAG and Iowa WBB ACL’s. One year 3 or 4 players with tears. This was like a decade long issue. Those teams would bounce around, would have a pop up season. Then around, 2015 Bluder really seemed to find herself. Bluder had lots of years to experiment and figure it out. By all standards Jan has done amazing for her 1st 2 years.
 

Scott559

All-American
Mar 16, 2010
2,961
9,607
113
Emely had a little more size and aggressiveness attacking the basket. Her problem was that she couldn't reel it in so that her aggressiveness didn't become a detriment. And Jan also needed to be able to do a better job of being able to reel that in as well.

Emely has skills, She didn’t have a good grasp on how to play team oriented basketball, She sure could have used a full season to develop vs the 6 games she played in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IowaCityLit
Feb 25, 2008
30,472
28,322
113
I didn’t really see anything out of Deal that made me think playing style was holding her back from shining. She’s not very quick.

I also think it’s a bit ironic if the Deals are upset on what JJ sold the program as. I could say the same thing the other way. I’m sure Iowa thought it was getting an immediate impact player and probably paid her as such. Instead we got a normal 3* recruit.

To the people saying we can’t lose 5* players, it doesn’t sound like it came down to money but if a 5* recruit gets paid 5* money and doesn’t perform, should you keep overpaying them. They probably aren’t eager to take a pay cut.
A. Two things can be true.........

B. Perception is reality until you play the games, and unfortunately, you can't solely bring in recruits based on the play of the games, otherwise we would've done EVEN MORE with the success of the CC era in terms of attracting recruits/transfers.

There's a BIG f***ing reason top recruits, especially of color, weren't simply jumping through steel walls to come play at Iowa so that UConn and South Carolina and other "money" programs didn't keep dominating the sport (and no, Lisa retiring/Jan taking the job wasn't a major factor).
 

IowaCityLit

All-Conference
Aug 30, 2025
823
1,511
93
Me and you must just see the game differently. I disagreed with you on Deal being underutilized and I feel the opposite on Mallegni. When she came in as a frosh, I feel like she was chucking up 3s like she had Peter Jok accuracy but would miss them all. Looked up her 3pt percentage to confirm: 23% last yr, 15% this yr.
Yeah it was in spurts. But again she was also a frosh and didn’t play much at all 2nd half of the season. Gotta develop these types of players. Or what’s the point? Either a development issue or an evaluation issue. At least for guards.
 
Feb 25, 2008
30,472
28,322
113
Levin surprised me, I thought she'd be content to be depth off the bench at Iowa. Guessing she could walk in and start in Ames, but sure hope she doesn't.
She could certainly start for a lesser program. Sometimes that's more important for kids that simply want to play, than being bench players with restricted minutes for the remainder of their time in college.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Big Z

SB_SB

All-Conference
Dec 17, 2022
1,424
2,520
113
Yeah it was in spurts. But again she was also a frosh and didn’t play much at all 2nd half of the season. Gotta develop these types of players. Or what’s the point? Either a development issue or an evaluation issue. At least for guards.

There's more to developing players than putting them in games. I know JJ can work with centers, but I'm not sure how she does with guards. We'll find out.
 

IowaCityLit

All-Conference
Aug 30, 2025
823
1,511
93
There's more to developing players than putting them in games. I know JJ can work with centers, but I'm not sure how she does with guards. We'll find out.
I think she may be overrated there as well. Maybe Ava is just damn good.

Hannah was a warrior but never developed an offensive game at all these last couple of years.

Ans Layla really struggled all year.

I think JJs development of players in general is still a huge question mark.
 

Hawkpunts40

Sophomore
Jan 27, 2025
41
108
32
A. Two things can be true.........

B. Perception is reality until you play the games, and unfortunately, you can't solely bring in recruits based on the play of the games, otherwise we would've done EVEN MORE with the success of the CC era in terms of attracting recruits/transfers.

There's a BIG f***ing reason top recruits, especially of color, weren't simply jumping through steel walls to come play at Iowa so that UConn and South Carolina and other "money" programs didn't keep dominating the sport (and no, Lisa retiring/Jan taking the job wasn't a major factor).
You lost me a bit on your last part here. Why weren’t we able to bring in big recruits?
 

SB_SB

All-Conference
Dec 17, 2022
1,424
2,520
113
I think she may be overrated there as well. Maybe Ava is just damn good.

Hannah was a warrior but never developed an offensive game at all these last couple of years.

Ans Layla really struggled all year.

I think JJs development of players in general is still a huge question mark.

JJ development of players goes way back, not just the last two years.
 

citizenHawk1

Senior
Jul 10, 2025
222
551
93
JJ built the roster with no guard depth and shooters. She overachieved with a roster she put together.

Gonna have to do it again next year after missing out on big time guard recruits.
There have been a lot of unfortunate misses, though the players on the team are primarily Bluder's last class. Why Iowa couldn't get elite players to play with Clark is the issue there. Jensen came in, gets some credit for retaining anyone, half credit for Olsen & Deal, full credit for Hays, Houston, Wright, Rodriguez, Woliczko, (and Seubert).

If you blame Jensen about missing on elite recruits, you aren't being very clear-eyed about how this era is going to work.