All Ralph does is win football games
- Thread starter Coach34
- Start date
- Status
...he also overthrows wide open receivers in the endzone on passes a ten year old could make, and he never checks down, and my personal favorite, he reads the option dive wrong at least 50 percent of the time.
But yeah, he wins, too. So I'll give him credit for that. I'd just rather beat bad times by the three TDs we should beat them instead of the nailbiters we've had lately.
But yeah, he wins, too. So I'll give him credit for that. I'd just rather beat bad times by the three TDs we should beat them instead of the nailbiters we've had lately.
He's not turning the ball over. For the most part he's taken care of the fumble problemshe had early in the season. He generally converts third and shorts.
I'm afraid we will need alot more in two weeks.
I'm afraid we will need alot more in two weeks.
He wouldn't be able to rally us from a big enough deficit requiring a lot of passes. I'm not a Relf hater btw. He does give us our best chance to win games.
Or go TEAM? I think the O-Line, Ballard, Perkins, Bumphis,the D-Line,White, Wright, Banks, Mitchell, and Whitley all have just as much say in it asRelf. So does the coaching staff. We are not 7-2 b/c of Relf, we are 7-2 b/c we have a lot of really good players and coaches. But Relf definitely does his part too. I think we'd still be 7-2 or at least 6-3 withpretty much any other QB back there. The main thing required of that position is to make good decisions and not turn the ball over. The main point is that this season has been a complete team effort and the whole team deserves praise. But this is what you do of course...you always put individuals above the team and the success of the team in an effort to build imiginary message boardcred in yourhead. Congrats!Coach34 said:
idiot. i guess this is the same exact team as last year's? no changes? no new defensive coordinator? in case you didn't notice, the offense was actually better last year. it's the defense that's getting it done this year. Don't forget there's a reason Relf wasn't the starter last year....he couldn't beat out the POS we had at QB last year. So, yeah, I stick by my original statement. This year's team as a whole is a LOT better than last year's, especially on the defensive side. We're not Auburn, and Relf is not Cam Newton. While he's certainly done an admirable job back there, we are not 7-2 solely b/c of him as the original poster tried to insinuate.
next time put a little thought into your posts before you start pecking at the keys.
next time put a little thought into your posts before you start pecking at the keys.
I see I got you pretty upset. Based upon your responses, I'm not going to even bother with debating with you.
He's still raw now passing-wise.
But he's pretty decent at managing the game. I was impressed at a protection audible he called on Saturday. I think we were in 5 wides when he motioned for the slot guy to come in at wing and block. Sure enough, the ball is snapped, and there's a defender flying into the guy Relf brought in to block. Then he completes a pass thanks to his own protection audible.
But he's pretty decent at managing the game. I was impressed at a protection audible he called on Saturday. I think we were in 5 wides when he motioned for the slot guy to come in at wing and block. Sure enough, the ball is snapped, and there's a defender flying into the guy Relf brought in to block. Then he completes a pass thanks to his own protection audible.
RougeDawg said:
Relf last year didn't really seem to "flip the switch" to me until he came back from his suspension against UK. Relf last year was not the same player that he is now. At least for half of the year.
that he is better option at QB against LSU last year at the end of the game. Thus 6 wins and a possible Liberty Bowl berth. I didn't say he was the next Sam Bradford, just saying that we would have had at least 6 wins if Relf had played more last year.
last year's time of possession was better.other than turnovers and 3rd down %, there is not a gnat's asses difference in any ofour offenses statistics from last year and this year (and that was against the #1 SOS). It does seem like the offense had a much easier time moving the ball last year, butwe would invariably turn it over in the red zone.That's the biggest difference, we don't turn the ball over this year (and I actually said before the season started that that one statistic would define our success this year). And, yes, that is a tribute to Relf. As I said, he is doing a good job. As I also said, all we need in that position is someone to not maketerrible decisions and not put the ball on the ground to be effective. I guess I should have said any "average" QB instead of any other QB. I don't understand why this is so hard. This is not Relf winning games by himself like you are trying to insinuate. This is a great team effort from the coaches to the players and I don't think you can single any one guy out as the reason. But if you and KurtisRambo want to disagree, that's fine too. I just think that is an insult to the rest of the team.Coach34 said:
most things in life are a tradeoff ... very hard to find the full package and I think Dan Mullen has done an excellent job with what he has to work with ... we are still somewhat in the shadow of Crooms team as far as the talent (with a few exceptions) ... Relf is adequate, not a multi talented two dimensional QB and for now anyway...appears to be the best answer we have ....I say thanks Relf and continue to give us your best effort
you said the offense "was better last season"...following it up with " there is not asses difference in any of our offenses statistics from last year and this year" doesnt help your case dumbass...
We average more PPG
We average more yards per rush
We average more passing yards per game
We have already scored the same number of offensive TD's in 9 games that we did in 12 games last year (30)
We average more yards per game
3rd down conversions are up to 46% from 33% (tremendous gap)
Red zone TD's are up to 61% from 48%
Our average per play is higher (5.9- 5.4)
"It does seem like the offense had a much easier time moving the ball last year"
We scored 17 offensive points vs Auburn, 15 on Vandy, and had no offensive TD's vs Bama or Florida...I don't know what team you watched last season, there was a helluva lot of 3 and outs last year
But dont let facts get in the way of you making a ****** post as usual
We average more PPG
We average more yards per rush
We average more passing yards per game
We have already scored the same number of offensive TD's in 9 games that we did in 12 games last year (30)
We average more yards per game
3rd down conversions are up to 46% from 33% (tremendous gap)
Red zone TD's are up to 61% from 48%
Our average per play is higher (5.9- 5.4)
"It does seem like the offense had a much easier time moving the ball last year"
We scored 17 offensive points vs Auburn, 15 on Vandy, and had no offensive TD's vs Bama or Florida...I don't know what team you watched last season, there was a helluva lot of 3 and outs last year
But dont let facts get in the way of you making a ****** post as usual
If you look at SEC games only, we are averaging 7 points less per game than last year, and we scored more last year on UF, LSU, Auburn, and UK than this year
In SEC games only, we averaged 343 yards per game last year, compared to 279 this year, and we're 11th in the SEC this year in SEC games only in terms of total offense and scoring offense
In SEC games only, we averaged 343 yards per game last year, compared to 279 this year, and we're 11th in the SEC this year in SEC games only in terms of total offense and scoring offense
said that Relf was the only reason we have won this year. I was just calling you out for saying that we can put "any" QB in and have the same results. That obviously is not the case.
1) Look at last year when we had Lee
2) Look at this year when Russell comes in
I really don't see why you're getting so upset over this. I just pointed out that you were wrong. Hell, you even admitted it in your last post.
1) Look at last year when we had Lee
2) Look at this year when Russell comes in
I really don't see why you're getting so upset over this. I just pointed out that you were wrong. Hell, you even admitted it in your last post.
whatever said:
Granted we are averaging 7 less points in SEC games to this point. But last time I checked, we have other games besides SEC games
Auburn last year? We ran a kick-off back and scored a garbage TD in the 4th on their back-ups down 42-17...we don't play anybody's back-ups this year
Scored more on Fla? No we didnt. We scored 10 on Fla this year as opposed to 3 last year...2 pick-6's doesnt make our offense better there Crooms
We scored more on Georgia this year than we did on Vandy last year
We are blowing out some OOC opponents that we couldnt last year
Bottom line- our offense is better this year than it was last year
hell during the LSU and Auburn games every time we went 5 wide the other team blitzed and something disastrous happened.
those scores against UF were defensive TDs, so I wouldn't necessarily say our O did better last year against them (scoring wise).
The occasional bulldozing of opposing players, holding on to the football (even with some horrific ankle high snaps), pulling spectacular plays out of his ***, and multiple throws so terrible that even the defense has no chance of catching it. If a QB gets hammered when teams lose he should also be recognized when his team wins, let alone wins 6 in a row in the SEC.
How many times did we either have fumbled snaps or missed handoffs inside the 20 last year when Mini Lee had the keys to the offense? How quickly we seem to forget. If we can just cut those in half last year we can win at least 6. It seemed like Lee was good for at least 1 or 2 of those a game last year.
How many times did we either have fumbled snaps or missed handoffs inside the 20 last year when Mini Lee had the keys to the offense? How quickly we seem to forget. If we can just cut those in half last year we can win at least 6. It seemed like Lee was good for at least 1 or 2 of those a game last year.
We're not only averaging 7 points less in SEC games, but 64 yards less per game, that's fairly significant (not to mention this is all with a defense that is giving us more opportunities and possessions).
It does help to drop Ga Tech and pick up Memphis, so it's pretty easy to see our OOC schedule was not where it was last year and that could be a reason for the increased stats. With the only games remaining being SEC games, you might could see us drop below last year's overall numbers as well, but it's pretty safe to say we won't be averaging the same yardage and points per game at the end of the year in SEC games only that we did last year.
-51 more yards and 10 more pts vs Auburn last year than this yr
-106 more yards and 19 more points vs LSU last year than this yr (you conveniently left this game out)
-8 more yards vs UF this yr, although their D was a lot better in 09
-168 more yards and 7 more points vs UK last year than this yr (you conveniently left this game out also)
-Also gained more yardage on Vandy in 09 than UGA in 10, had as many scoring drives(4), just settled for 3 FG's
Being 11th in the SEC in conference games only in total offense and scoring offense makes it pretty easy to see why we are where we are, and that's defense. We gave up 29.4 points per game in league games last year, compared to 16.4 this year. If we were giving up 29.4 points per game in league games this year, we'd possibly be 0-5
It does help to drop Ga Tech and pick up Memphis, so it's pretty easy to see our OOC schedule was not where it was last year and that could be a reason for the increased stats. With the only games remaining being SEC games, you might could see us drop below last year's overall numbers as well, but it's pretty safe to say we won't be averaging the same yardage and points per game at the end of the year in SEC games only that we did last year.
-51 more yards and 10 more pts vs Auburn last year than this yr
-106 more yards and 19 more points vs LSU last year than this yr (you conveniently left this game out)
-8 more yards vs UF this yr, although their D was a lot better in 09
-168 more yards and 7 more points vs UK last year than this yr (you conveniently left this game out also)
-Also gained more yardage on Vandy in 09 than UGA in 10, had as many scoring drives(4), just settled for 3 FG's
Being 11th in the SEC in conference games only in total offense and scoring offense makes it pretty easy to see why we are where we are, and that's defense. We gave up 29.4 points per game in league games last year, compared to 16.4 this year. If we were giving up 29.4 points per game in league games this year, we'd possibly be 0-5
- Status