I'll take a stab at backing up pat's view
Using your very narrow minded approach, the Pac 12 has two Sweet 16 teams to one for the new Big East - which means absolutely nothing when comparing the UCLA and Butler coaching jobs.
Not sure if this is what pat is thinking, but it's something that supports his view, so here ya go.
UCLA is crazier that UK. They have more unrealistic standards that anyone.
Lavin had a top recruiting class, made the Sweet 16 5 out of the first 6 seasons, had an elite8 in there, and was fired after a single bad season.
Homeland made 3 final fours in a row, has won the conference, did that this season, and was fired.
When given the choice between that situation and one with stability and far less scrutiny, which makes more sense?
yes, the pay is higher at UCLA, one must assume. And yes, the glory could be higher because the potential is higher.
But the expectations are so far beyond anything that is reasonable, it's just a recipe for short term employment and absurd amounts of scrutiny.
No thanks that's not appealing.