Excellent comparison Pax.
Question about that pic of Obama...do his ears sort of remind you of Mr. Potato head?
![]()
Just another reason why Breitbart is a joke. The 2009 article is about plans to replace the attorneys and the recent article is about the attorneys being asked to resign immediately, different situations, different tone. smhLMAO
Just another reason why Breitbart is a joke. The 2009 article is about plans to replace the attorneys and the recent article is about the attorneys being asked to resign immediately, different situations, different tone. smh
Just another reason why Breitbart is a joke. The 2009 article is about plans to replace the attorneys and the recent article is about the attorneys being asked to resign immediately, different situations, different tone. smh
Maybe if you'd open the links inside the article you wouldn't look like such a fool. In the 2009 article the attorneys have not been replaced yet, there are only plans. Thanks for the softball.There is zero difference between then and now. Zero. The only difference is in the wording of the headline.
Hahaha, I think you honestly believe this.Just another reason why Breitbart is a joke. The 2009 article is about plans to replace the attorneys and the recent article is about the attorneys being asked to resign immediately, different situations, different tone. smh
Show how that I am wrong.Hahaha, I think you honestly believe this.
Show how that I am wrong.
it is our intention to have the U.S. Attorneys that are selected by President Obama in place as quickly as they can."
moe wrote:
"Maybe if you'd open the links inside the article you wouldn't look like such a fool. In the 2009 article the attorneys have not been replaced yet, there are only plans".
...and the response from moe is.......?????????????
He is making a distinction with no difference.
AND the obvious intent behind that wording!There is zero difference between then and now. Zero. The only difference is in the wording of the headline.
So, what is your point? There is nothing different in the actions taken. The way it is presented shows an intent to cast Trump in a far more negative light. Typical reaction and mode of operation for the current press as regards Trump.Maybe if you'd open the links inside the article you wouldn't look like such a fool. In the 2009 article the attorneys have not been replaced yet, there are only plans. Thanks for the softball.
Obama to replace U.S. Attorneys
By Josh Gerstein
05/15/09 08:34 AM EDT
President Barack Obama plans to replace a "batch" of U.S. Attorneys in the next few weeks and more prosecutors thereafter, according to Attorney General Eric Holder
So, what is your point? There is nothing different in the actions taken. The way it is presented shows an intent to cast Trump in a far more negative light. Typical reaction and mode of operation for the current press as regards Trump.
Not worth the effort to elucidate the many examples of what a moronic waste of my air you are.Show how that I am wrong.
I still think the likeness to J Fred Muggs was uncanny when the picture is of a shadow.Excellent comparison Pax.
Question about that pic of Obama...do his ears sort of remind you of Mr. Potato head?
![]()
I still think the likeness to J Fred Muggs was uncanny when the picture is of a shadow.