Nate Robinson?
Yup. Went on to get a face tattoo and ended up in prison
Nate Robinson?
Better players …yes . Players with no character and a locker room cancer ….no .We need players. The DL was terribile in the Maryland game and most of the season couldn’t generate a pass rush without bringing extra guys.
He’s not coming here anyway , but if we want to be a good program we need better players
I didn’t miss the point . I watched it and I remember how great he was for that school and program . When he was winning that heisman at Alabama in a classic , flood was in a rock fight with one of the worst army teams of all time.You missed the point. It was worth the watch. It’s a pretty damning indictment of some college programs - and the NCAA more broadly. It was apparent the kid had significant drug and alcohol problems - but no one cared as long as he showed up on Saturday. As long as his play made the school and others tons of money.
Like yes, I’m not a fan of win at all costs. If doing things the right way means we’re a competitive, perennial bowl team that doesn’t win a natty, I’m fine with that.
I know for a fact that the kid I am referring to would have picked Rutgers over Bama/LSUI went to Rutgers twice so I have no choice. Picking Rutgers over South Florida was a no brainer. Please do not act like if the kid had offers from LSU or Bama he would have come here.
You can build all you want, and talk about process, etc., but you can’t win without talented athletes at the level we compete at.We’re building the slow, steady, way, for the most part. We took a risk in Taj Harris and got burned. This risk just wasn’t worth it.
We don’t recruit talented athletes, for the most part, we develop them. People who want us to recruit talented athletes can write a check.You can build all you want, and talk about process, etc., but you can’t win without talented athletes at the level we compete at.
Redshirting and developing have taken a backseat in the NIL era. It’s a revolving door with players and coaches.We don’t recruit talented athletes, for the most part, we develop them. People who want us to recruit talented athletes can write a check.
yes, nut without NIL money to give, redshirting and development is the way many programs need to use in order to make their programs competitive.Redshirting and developing have taken a backseat in the NIL era. It’s a revolving door with players and coaches.
Yes I did and he's not going to change anything we would need a few more studsI mean he’s going to LSU….if he’s good enough for them , he’s sure the hell good enough for us. Did you watch the Maryland game ??
Well 1 more stud is how you get more studsYes I did and he's not going to change anything we would need a few more studs
Well 1 more stud is how you get more studs
Any Rahway peeps think he looks like Antonio garay ?
This is just flat out wrong. We most certainly recruit talented athletes. You're right that we have to develop them more, but these kids coming into the program are very good athletes. Maybe they need to add some weight and muscle, but saying that they're not talented athletes is being disingenuous.We don’t recruit talented athletes, for the most part, we develop them. People who want us to recruit talented athletes can write a check.
we recruit athletes whose talent has to be developed, which is why most are redshirted.This is just flat out wrong. We most certainly recruit talented athletes. You're right that we have to develop them more, but these kids coming into the program are very good athletes. Maybe they need to add some weight and muscle, but saying that they're not talented athletes is being disingenuous.
This is just flat out wrong. We most certainly recruit talented athletes. You're right that we have to develop them more, but these kids coming into the program are very good athletes. Maybe they need to add some weight and muscle, but saying that they're not talented athletes is being disingenuous.
we recruit athletes whose talent has to be developed, which is why most are redshirted.
I think most teams are "developmental."
My HS team was developmental
I think developmental tag is used as a fig leaf to excuse mediocrity year in and out
For a long time I've been hearing GS say RU "needs more depth and we're working hard on it."
we made the right move not going after this kid .
This is the kind of kid that we just don't want here. Sorry, not sure his talent can compensate for his behavior anyway.
This is the Big Ten, not little league. its going to take time for the team to be on par with our peers from an S&C perspective. every year we get a little better. in two years, we will have turned the roster over, and our s&c will be on par with everyone else.If you’re going to bang the drum about the “developmental program” nonsense , that’s fine. But you can’t just suck and mail in the final month of the the season. Any moron will ask what kind of development is that?
Shouldn’t that have happened by now ? It’s year 4 ? Most of the ash guys stunk and -also there is the portal .This is the Big Ten, not little league. its going to take time for the team to be on par with our peers from an S&C perspective. every year we get a little better. in two years, we will have turned the roster over, and our s&c will be on par with everyone else.
That was the Chris Ash method and failed miserably. You recruit talented athletes and develop them into football players.We don’t recruit talented athletes, for the most part, we develop them. People who want us to recruit talented athletes can write a check.
People pushing for Alfano seem to forget the last time RU took someone with a suspect background.
How many games did Ahmir Mitchell play for RU and how bog was his impact?
Well, I can bet the farm that he'll never play for RutgersWell 1 more stud is how you get more studs
Any Rahway peeps think he looks like Antonio garay ?
Our depth killed us. We had lost our best 3 wrs, our best LB, our best TE, 1 of our better RBs and the other two were not at 100%.If you’re going to bang the drum about the “developmental program” nonsense , that’s fine. But you can’t just suck and mail in the final month of the the season. Any moron will ask what kind of development is that?
Depth killed us yes . But people don’t want to take a risk on a possible stud in alfano ?Our depth killed us. We had lost our best 3 wrs, our best LB, our best TE, 1 of our better RBs and the other two were not at 100%.
We have developed, at most positions, B10 competitive players. Our depth is not there yet at quite a few spots.
It is not an excuse but it makes a difference.
As a coach I have, at times, lost a high level or elite player on the team to injury and you can not just pull up the next player and expect the same level of play.
I am conflicted on ideas like this. For me culture is first. Always has and always will be. I do not know enough about the young man in his current life to say if he would be an issue or not. i know he had years of being an issue, and maybe that was a medical thing that is sorted out now.Depth killed us yes . But people don’t want to take a risk on a possible stud in alfano ?
Beggars can’t be choosers
6-6 was the goal??? WTF?Shouldn’t that have happened by now ? It’s year 4 ? Most of the ash guys stunk and -also there is the portal .
Some progress was made this year . 6-6 was the goal and we achieved it. But there are red flags. You have to see that
Not for us. Recruiting and developing is our programs lifebloodRedshirting and developing have taken a backseat in the NIL era. It’s a revolving door with players and coaches.
Yes . 6-6. Bowl eligible.6-6 was the goal??? WTF?
We recruit athletes whose talent and physical attributes have to be developed. I still remember sitting at a football banquet table with Ray Rice thinking, “Man, I can kick his @ss”. The next year, his arms were bigger than my legs, and I wanted NO part of him.This is just flat out wrong. We most certainly recruit talented athletes. You're right that we have to develop them more, but these kids coming into the program are very good athletes. Maybe they need to add some weight and muscle, but saying that they're not talented athletes is being disingenuous.
Come on. No we don’t. I don’t know what I can say to convince you that Alfano is an awful human being that doesn’t belong at Rutgers. You’ll just have to trust us.Depth killed us yes . But people don’t want to take a risk on a possible stud in alfano ?
Beggars can’t be choosers
Well, please share . Maybe you can convince me. Why is he an awfulCome on. No we don’t. I don’t know what I can say to convince you that Alfano is an awful human being that doesn’t belong at Rutgers. You’ll just have to trust us.
I only hope that he finds football success at LSU and plays Sundays.
OK- it is always the "goal" but pre season- it was only a hope and no one predicted itYes . 6-6. Bowl eligible.
What other goal was there ?
Stupid comments like beggars can’t be choosers show how weak your argument is. He doesn’t fit the culture that the program emphasizes. Otherwise he’d have been in an RU jersey already.Depth killed us yes . But people don’t want to take a risk on a possible stud in alfano ?
Beggars can’t be choosers
Only thing that matters is winning foootball games . Schiano must not think the kid can do that.Stupid comments like beggars can’t be choosers show how weak your argument is. He doesn’t fit the culture that the program emphasizes. Otherwise he’d have been in an RU jersey already.
You’d rather manwhore yourself for a cheap thrill not realizing you’d never get to the thrill part.
Plum,Only thing that matters is winning foootball games . Schiano must not think the kid can do that.
I have no idea. I really don’t know how good of a player he is. But I would think if he’s good enough to get a shot at LSU, he’s good enough to get a shot here . Did you watch our pass rush this season ? It stunkPlum,
Do you think that Alfano gets playing time at LSU next season? I’m not sure that he makes it to the opening day roster.
The kid is a gamble, Rutgers probably isn't the only programs that passed on recruitingI have no idea. I really don’t know how good of a player he is. But I would think if he’s good enough to get a shot at LSU, he’s good enough to get a shot here . Did you watch our pass rush this season ? It stunk
I think it depends on how far into establishing the culture you are. I think you take a risk on him in year 5 where you have established leaders and incumbent leaders. Not in year 1.