Any update on Ndongo or Davis signing?

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Yes, sorry I was trying to be funny.
I don't understand how people watch Simpson and think what they do - like that he'd start at point.
I feel sorry for him, he's been recruited over.
I could be wrong, but I see Simpson being very valuable giving us depth off the bench. A guy who might play 10 minutes or 30 minutes in a given game.
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Who do you think starts at point guard in 2024-25?
The way things are going in college basketball right now it could very well be someone currently on a different team. Simpson could be starting point guard for Iona with a $300,000 marketing deal with a random car dealership.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MiloTalon13

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
11,637
10,743
78
I think to be fair to Simpson we need to make some sort of adjustment with his play early in the year. There is definitely a huge adjustment and quite frankly he wasn't ready when he was thrust in to point guard duties vs Temple.

That’s fine - but in 9 of our last 15 games of the season he shot 33% or worse from the field. Paul played worse than he’s ever played throughout a lengthy RU career during this stretch and only scored 33% or worse 4 times. In fact, he was only worse than 41% 5 out of those 15 games.

Derek isn’t big enough to guard a 3 or a 4 so despite being a willing defender, Paul is more versatile on the other end as well. Especially when you consider that Noah will be on the court at 5-10.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
11,637
10,743
78
I could be wrong, but I see Simpson being very valuable giving us depth off the bench. A guy who might play 10 minutes or 30 minutes in a given game.
who is saying he won’t play? The role you are describing sounds just like Tez. streaky player who was great when he was on. That’d set him up to play about as many minutes as he did this year. I’m just not penciling him in for the 30 others are suggesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MiloTalon13

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
11,637
10,743
78
The Derek Simpson stock plunged 20+% with the signing of Fernandes.
Well yeah. When he was a clear top 1-2 PG on the roster he was staring at more PT. He’s now set up to come into the game as a spark plug in a slasher role. Doesn’t mean he won’t add value. He does different things than guys like Noah, Cam or Paul. Will definitely be situations where having him come off the bench will be huge for us.
 

RUBlackout7

All-Conference
Apr 10, 2021
1,535
2,097
0
Argue? There's no argument; Paul was clearly better than Simpson was last season. As we have more scoring threats on the floor such that Paul's lack of shooting attempts becomes less of an issue, this will only become more true.

Now hopefully Simpson improves a lot.
Pass the pipe. Must be why Pike started to play Simpson over Paul.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU84

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,368
113
Is the argument for which one comes off the bench first behind Noah/Cam/Gavin?
Paul is going to be a starter, at least to start tbr season. I just can't see Pike sitting him as a 5th year senior captain

Gavin can force his way into the starting lineup potentially, then it'll be interesting to see who would go to the bench. Starting a freshman over Paul out of the gate seems unlikely

Possible scenario if Mag isn't ready is to play Paul and Gavin in an offensive heavy lineup, but Pike might be concerned with the defense
 
  • Like
Reactions: needmorecowbell

RUBlackout7

All-Conference
Apr 10, 2021
1,535
2,097
0
GameP. Mulcahy MinutesD. Simpson Minutes
Michigan
30​
36​
Purdue
36​
27​
Hofstra
40​
40​
Last 3 Games
106
103

Looks like you've already had quite enough of the pipe.
At the point. Paul was demoted because he absolutely sucked.
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,368
113
That's a position change lol. I think everyone agrees that it was a good thing. But it's not "playing Simpson over Paul" because.. Paul was still playing. It was playing Simpson over some combination of (mostly) Hyatt and Palmquist.
It's almost like people didn't watch the games. Do people not remember seeing Paul and Simpson on the court together?
 

RUBlackout7

All-Conference
Apr 10, 2021
1,535
2,097
0
Guys that suck don’t play 30+ minutes. Paul moved over to Mag’s spot once Derek was given Hyatt & Oscar’s starting minutes.

What else would you like to spin?
Our bench was bad and only reason Paul was in the starting lineup. If Mag wasn’t hurt he would have been benched.
 

rutgersron

All-Conference
Jul 14, 2012
897
1,088
63
It's interesting to see who gets hung up on specific stats, and who is more focused on the larger picture.

Last year, Mulcahy largely made our offense go for most of the year - he wasn't usually the guy scoring the points, but he was "the straw that stirs the drink" in numerous ways. When he was off the floor, our offense fell apart for most of the season - poor ball movement, disorganization, and a lot of passing around the perimeter with empty possessions.

Simpson coming in later in the season at the PG allowed Mulcahy more freedom in the half court set, because he wasn't being asked to bring the ball up or face the fastest defender. Hoping to have Fernandes or Simpson running point with him in the point-forward role in the half court.

We'll have more flexibility with lineups and will be less reliant on a single "starting lineup". Mulcahy on the floor with two perimeter threats and Omoruyi at the rim is ideal. Assuming Griffiths is a shooter (as all reports indicate), that'd be any combo of Fernandes/Spencer/Griffiths would give Mulcahy room to operate in the post, with options to dish to either of two shooters and to Omoruyi in the paint.

Does this mean he sees 30+ minutes? I don't think so. I think we'll see five guys rotating across the 120 minutes at the 1-3 spots, without any being called on to do 30+ night-in and night-out like we had this year. Different combinations, different offensive looks, and different pressures to put on defenses. All anchored ideally by Mag/NDongo/Hyatt at the PF spot and Omoruyi/Woolfolk at the C.
Hopefully Pike listens and doesn’t have multiple players playing 30+ minutes a game. This is why the team goes downhill towards the end of the year. They are worn out. The potential depth we will have next year is impressive. Spread the minutes.
 

needmorecowbell

Heisman
Oct 28, 2007
9,134
10,005
78
Hopefully Pike listens and doesn’t have multiple players playing 30+ minutes a game. This is why the team goes downhill towards the end of the year. They are worn out. The potential depth we will have next year is impressive. Spread the minutes.
Most teams run with a 7 man rotation late in the season and give multiple players 30+ mins.
 

MiloTalon13

All-American
Jun 3, 2022
3,979
5,608
0
I could be wrong, but I see Simpson being very valuable giving us depth off the bench. A guy who might play 10 minutes or 30 minutes in a given game.
I agree. All he has to do is get better at almost everything. Which might sound like a joke, but I mean it, he might.
 

MiloTalon13

All-American
Jun 3, 2022
3,979
5,608
0
Starting a freshman over Paul out of the gate seems unlikely
When was the last time Rutgers beat out Michigan, Alabama, Virginia Tech, Uconn, Iowa, etc for a recruit?
Griffiths isn't like any other Freshmen that Pikiell has coached.
Pike's typical recruits in the past don't even have many P5 offers.
 

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
The historical data on guys with Simpson's size, minutes, and stats is pretty promising.

There is a very very big error bar on Simpson because of the type of player he is and the year he had. There are dozens of guys like him (meaning, similar enough size, similar enough game, similar enough stats) every year and a not-insignificant number of them really pop out as sophomores. AJ Hoggard, Kobe Bufkin, De'Vion Harmon, Wade Taylor are some recent examples that come to mind. Of course the names of the guys who don't break out -- and that number is higher than those who do -- get forgotten, but still.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fluoxetine

MiloTalon13

All-American
Jun 3, 2022
3,979
5,608
0
The historical data on guys with Simpson's size, minutes, and stats is pretty promising.

There is a very very big error bar on Simpson because of the type of player he is and the year he had. There are dozens of guys like him (meaning, similar enough size, similar enough game, similar enough stats) every year and a not-insignificant number of them really pop out as sophomores. AJ Hoggard, Kobe Bufkin, De'Vion Harmon, Wade Taylor are some recent examples that come to mind. Of course the names of the guys who don't break out -- and that number is higher than those who do -- get forgotten, but still.
Out of HS - Bufkin #40, Harmon #44, Hoggard #70, Taylor #109 on Rivals (4 star)
 

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
Out of HS - Bufkin #40, Harmon #44, Hoggard #70, Taylor #109 on Rivals (4 star)
That's fair. Kendric Davis (#149) and Mike Miles (#175) also fit the bill.

I had an excellent idea of what Cliff and Paul's sophomore years would look like. I had a pretty good idea of what Geo and Montez would be like as sophomores. I have very little idea what Simpson will look like, which I find interesting given the playing time. Like, obviously we don't know what Woolfolk will look like but he played far less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eagleton96

MiloTalon13

All-American
Jun 3, 2022
3,979
5,608
0
That's fair. Kendric Davis (#149) and Mike Miles (#175) also fit the bill.

I had an excellent idea of what Cliff and Paul's sophomore years would look like. I had a pretty good idea of what Geo and Montez would be like as sophomores. I have very little idea what Simpson will look like, which I find interesting given the playing time. Like, obviously we don't know what Woolfolk will look like but he played far less.
Miles was a starter and 13.6 ppg, 36% from 3 as a Freshman
Davis transferred, always shot over 31% from 3

I think I know what you're getting at - the fact that Simpson played 20 mins/game bodes very well for him. The coaches see a lot more than we do and they gave him those minutes because they saw something.

OR - there was just nobody else.

What I see - Under 20% from 3, prefers dribble pull-ups which are bad shots, doesn't handle or pass particularly well. Puts his head down and goes for his shot when under pressure - a terrible trait for a PG.
I HOPE he improves at everything, he's a great story, underrecruited kid, looks like Geo, from Jersey. All that's great. With the guys we have coming in, I don't see it. I hope he proves me wrong.
 

SJScarlet

All-Conference
Jan 30, 2006
1,988
2,401
83
Impossible to say at this point. If you just want to argue about it, I'd say it's more likely Davis, Warren or a transfer than Simpson.
Not looking to argue, you stated a bunch of stuff so here’s some thoughts to consider: It’s highly unlikely but not impossible that the starting lineup in 24 is Warren, Harper, Griffiths, Ace, [center of choice, Wolf, Somerville, transfer]. You don’t throw a zero experience freshman in Warren into that lineup for 27+ minutes and expect to succeed as a team.
As to Davis, anything is possible. He could outplay Simspson and maybe some promises have been made. But it’s much more likely Simpson gets 15 mpg next year and Davis gets mop up duty. In that scenario, there’s little chance he jumps Simpson in 24.
 

needmorecowbell

Heisman
Oct 28, 2007
9,134
10,005
78
Not looking to argue, you stated a bunch of stuff so here’s some thoughts to consider: It’s highly unlikely but not impossible that the starting lineup in 24 is Warren, Harper, Griffiths, Ace, [center of choice, Wolf, Somerville, transfer]. You don’t throw a zero experience freshman in Warren into that lineup for 27+ minutes and expect to succeed as a team.
As to Davis, anything is possible. He could outplay Simspson and maybe some promises have been made. But it’s much more likely Simpson gets 15 mpg next year and Davis gets mop up duty. In that scenario, there’s little chance he jumps Simpson in 24.
Pike will play experienced guys if it’s close. Ace and Dylan are a different though. Those two guys will be automatic starts from day 1. They both play offense and defense too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

SJScarlet

All-Conference
Jan 30, 2006
1,988
2,401
83
Pike will play experienced guys if it’s close. Ace and Dylan are a different thought. Those two guys will be automatic starts from day 1. They both play offense and defense too.
Exactly. 3+ ball dominant true freshman playing 26+ minutes is a major risk come March, let alone the regular season conference grind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: needmorecowbell

RU84

All-Conference
May 6, 2003
1,417
1,308
48
Pass the pipe. Must be why Pike started to play Simpson over Paul.
Exactly. Paul was forced to play PG because he was the best out of a bunch of poor options at the beginning of the season. He's not a power 5 PG. Pike brought Simpson along a little too slowly but when it was do or die time in the post season he turned the keys over to Derrick. By season's end he was the best option and the only player remotely capable of creating his own shot ... crucial to the success of any good basketball team. Sorry, not in Paul's tool kit. Who was the last shot drawn up for to drive in for a final shot vs Hofstra? Derrick. Speaks volumes.

"But, but what about shooting pct?" For those fixated on shooting pct in a vaccum, how much does that tell you about whose an overall better player? This season Gary Payton 2nd led all starting guards with a 75% shooting pct. Jason Tatum, Donovan Mitchell, Steph Curry, Ja Morant, Trae Young ... all below 50%. You taking Payton over any of those players?
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,368
113
When was the last time Rutgers beat out Michigan, Alabama, Virginia Tech, Uconn, Iowa, etc for a recruit?
Griffiths isn't like any other Freshmen that Pikiell has coached.
Pike's typical recruits in the past don't even have many P5 offers.
I've been championing Griffiths from the jump and thought he might start. With Fernandes here now, I think he starts at the point and Paul at the 3... to start the season at least

It's much easier for Pike to start Paul as a 5th year senior captain than bench him for a freshman. I just don't see him doing that

Again, Gavin may force his way into the starting lineup, but I see Gavin as an offense weapon off the bench, first wing sub to start the year as the much more likely scenario

Who knows how Paul would take being benched for a freshman from game 1... that could cause team chemistry issues
 

needmorecowbell

Heisman
Oct 28, 2007
9,134
10,005
78
I've been championing Griffiths from the jump and thought he might start. With Fernandes here now, I think he starts at the point and Paul at the 3... to start the season at least

It's much easier for Pike to start Paul as a 5th year senior captain than bench him for a freshman. I just don't see him doing that

Again, Gavin may force his way into the starting lineup, but I see Gavin as an offense weapon off the bench, first wing sub to start the year as the much more likely scenario

Who knows how Paul would take being benched for a freshman from game 1... that could cause team chemistry issues
How many times has pike said, he can call any play or switch up defenses with easy because of his guys experience. He values experience much more than anyone here for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

rudad02

All-American
Nov 7, 2010
8,853
5,773
0
I've been championing Griffiths from the jump and thought he might start. With Fernandes here now, I think he starts at the point and Paul at the 3... to start the season at least

It's much easier for Pike to start Paul as a 5th year senior captain than bench him for a freshman. I just don't see him doing that

Again, Gavin may force his way into the starting lineup, but I see Gavin as an offense weapon off the bench, first wing sub to start the year as the much more likely scenario

Who knows how Paul would take being benched for a freshman from game 1... that could cause team chemistry issues
Time for Paul to move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MiloTalon13

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,897
0
"But, but what about shooting pct?" For those fixated on shooting pct in a vaccum, how much does that tell you about whose an overall better player? This season Gary Payton 2nd led all starting guards with a 75% shooting pct. Jason Tatum, Donovan Mitchell, Steph Curry, Ja Morant, Trae Young ... all below 50%. You taking Payton over any of those players?
Not sure if serious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MiloTalon13

mjjoyce51

All-Conference
Mar 29, 2012
778
1,048
88
Excuse Me What GIF


"But, but what about shooting pct?" For those fixated on shooting pct in a vaccum, how much does that tell you about whose an overall better player? This season Gary Payton 2nd led all starting guards with a 75% shooting pct. Jason Tatum, Donovan Mitchell, Steph Curry, Ja Morant, Trae Young ... all below 50%. You taking Payton over any of those players?