Anyone else feel like what the NCAA baseball committee is doing

[GOODDAWG]

Is just anti-SEC crap? I kinda feel that way. The SEC is better than a 3 host league, the ACC is NOT a 5 host league. Discuss.

 

[rugbdawg]

nm

 

[GOODDAWG]

Ummmm.. 5 host league? I'm not so sure...

 

[patdog]

The committee sees what I've seen all year. The SEC is down this year. We'll get a 2-seed, but if I'm a Bear fan I'm a little worried about getting into a regional at all. And Georgia can hang it up.

 

[GOODDAWG]

Is that related to a anti-SEC mindset?

 

[Barkman Turner Overdrive]

Care to defend that statement?

 

[RonnyAtmosphere]

"The committee sees what I've seen all year."


I doubt it. You are a despair-riddled concern troll.


The commitee, on the other hand, deals in emotionlesss numbers.

 

[GOODDAWG]

Driven by anti-SEC bias?

 

[alabamadog]

<div>Purdue's schedule was too easy. The only top 25 team they played was UCLA. The second best team they played was Louisville. They have the best 1-50 record, but it is because they avoided teams in the top half of that category. Miami probably should not be hosting either, but to their credit they played a very difficult schedule so I am a little more understanding in their case.</div>Kentucky<div>1-50: 13-13</div><div>51-100: 4-1</div><div>101-200: 14-1</div><div>201+: 12-1</div><div>SOS: 43</div><div>RPI: 14</div><div>
</div><div>Miami</div><div>1-50: 14-19</div><div>51-100: 9-1</div><div>101-200: 9-1</div><div>201+: 3-0</div><div>SOS: 3</div><div>RPI: 11</div><div>
</div><div>Purdue</div><div>1-50: 9-6</div><div>51-100: 16-2</div><div>101-200: 5-4</div><div>201+: 13-0</div><div>SOS: 79</div><div>RPI: 16</div><div>
</div><div>Mississippi State</div><div>1-50: 15-13</div><div>51-100: 8-7</div><div>101-200: 12-2</div><div>201+: 4-0</div><div>SOS: 9</div><div>RPI: 19</div>

 

[patdog]

I'm a lot more pissed about Miami hosting than Purdue. Now there's a team that doesn't deserve it.</p>

 

[Rutherford B Hays]

Rice has the weakest RPI of any host team.