Apologies to Caleb

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
Don't think an apology is in order as he was legitimately the worst power conference player in the country for three weeks. The version we've gotten lately is what I've been hoping to see and certainly deserves praise.

I do hope he uses his extra year here although my guess is that's unlikely (no geographical ties and all of the guys he came up - Ron, Geo, Myles, Tez) will be gone.

Cliff is the one guy we absolutely can't lose next off-season. But Caleb would be next up for me. Jones is third because of his potential but he hasn't shown us anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gudenham

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Caleb’s energy reminded me last night of Jacob. The bad news is that it stands out.

Watch what players are trying to get the team in to huddles and encouraging each other. Caleb, Mag, Jalen and Paul. Pay attention to who isn’t.

I think your tri captains next year are Cliff, Caleb and Paul. I am bullish about next year. Obviously I am taking a leap of faith with the portal.
 

gregkoko

All-Conference
Sep 22, 2016
1,646
3,218
113
Don't think an apology is in order as he was legitimately the worst power conference player in the country for three weeks. The version we've gotten lately is what I've been hoping to see and certainly deserves praise.

I do hope he uses his extra year here although my guess is that's unlikely (no geographical ties and all of the guys he came up - Ron, Geo, Myles, Tez) will be gone.

Cliff is the one guy we absolutely can't lose next off-season. But Caleb would be next up for me. Jones is third because of his potential but he hasn't shown us anything.

Caleb and Pike seem to have grown closer. Pike is more or less giving him free reign and trusts him implicitly. As of now gotta think he's staying.
 

Local Shill

All-American
Aug 30, 2001
21,520
7,329
113
So the implication by some in this thread are that Baker and Harper are to blame and that we'd somehow be better off without them. After last year ended, the same people pushing this said the supposed "problem" players were Jake and Mathis.

It's ridiculous. I actually shudder to think what this team will look like without Baker and Harper next year unless the coach unexpectedly reels in a big fish in the transfer portal. Right now, this is a below average Atlantic 10 team without 0 and 24.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: kcg88 and RUJMM78

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
So the implication by some in this thread are that Baker and Harper are to blame and that we'd somehow be better off without them. After last year ended, the same people pushing this said the supposed "problem" players were Jake and Mathis.

It's ridiculous. I actually shudder to think what this team will look like without Baker and Harper next year unless the coach unexpectedly reels in a big fish in the transfer portal. Right now, this is a below average Atlantic 10 team without 0 and 24.
If you are making the implication that I have implied......I thought losing Jacob was a huge loss and may have dropped hints that the alleged "chemistry" angle definitely took 2 parties.

I will come out and say it....there is a disconnect between what I think this program's identity is and the leaders of the team. That is a huge problem and I said it or implied it before the season. When shots fall and the crowd is in to the game everything is fine. I counted 4X in the 1st half alone where one of our leaders was in a position to move one step to help dribble penetration. He either watched or moved with his arms and not feet. Our leaders also were absent during the offseason with stength and conditioning.
 

S_Janowski

Heisman
May 24, 2009
13,919
26,526
113
Lots of posters should be ashamed of the things they said about Caleb.

He was in a terrible slump no doubt but if you paid any attention to Rutgers basketball the past few years you would have realized the value he brings (when healthy) and would have had some patience until he broke out of his funk.
 

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
17,110
15,541
72
Lots of posters should be ashamed of the things they said about Caleb.

He was in a terrible slump no doubt but if you paid any attention to Rutgers basketball the past few years you would have realized the value he brings (when healthy) and would have had some patience until he broke out of his funk.
I agree. I will say that some of the blame, for the way Caleb’s early woes hurt us, goes to Pike. He should have directed Caleb to focus on shooting inside the arc until his shooting rhythm was back in sync.

Caleb appears to have done just that in recent games. It took 5 games and going 0-10 from the arc with several air balls before Caleb adjusted and took no 3-point shots at UMass and only two against Clemson (he made one of those).

In the last three games Caleb is 2-6 on treys, and it’s worth noting that he had 0 attempts from behind the arc against Purdue.

Clearly we need Caleb to do his thing — defend, steal, rebound, assist and score, but his scoring from beyond the arc is best when coming from limited attempts (0, 1, or 2 per game).
 
Last edited:

ScarletDog

All-Conference
May 7, 2007
2,087
2,133
113
It’s interesting to see that Caleb is still struggling mightily with his shooting stroke. Still pushing the ball most of the time. But when he released the ball right it’s a thing of beauty. I was watching him on the free throw line last night at one point and he was jeckyl and Hyde. First stroke was a shot put push and missed badly. Second shot was a smooth release and was perfect. If he can groove the stroke he will be even more effective. His energy is great and ge seemed to get a million first half rebounds. We need more active, athletic guys on the floor. Bring us more Mag as well…getting better each game.
 

cm_13

All-American
Aug 28, 2018
2,641
5,551
73
It’s interesting to see that Caleb is still struggling mightily with his shooting stroke. Still pushing the ball most of the time. But when he released the ball right it’s a thing of beauty. I was watching him on the free throw line last night at one point and he was jeckyl and Hyde. First stroke was a shot put push and missed badly. Second shot was a smooth release and was perfect. If he can groove the stroke he will be even more effective. His energy is great and ge seemed to get a million first half rebounds. We need more active, athletic guys on the floor. Bring us more Mag as well…getting better each game.
Caleb was 4-4 from the free throw line last night.
 

Saint Puppy

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2013
4,595
2,420
113
Unfortunately Caleb is consistently inconsistent. He'll have a few good games, and you're like finally he's the player I always knew he was going to be.....and then he falls apart. When he's on, he's a complete player and I really love his game because he's a serious Plus. When he's off, it's unfortunately land of the lost and you're left wondering what the heck happened.
 

LeapinLou

All-American
Jul 24, 2001
13,178
6,870
113
The criticism of Caleb early is as unwarranted as the criticism of Paul now. Guys have slumps. Guys bounce back.

Yes both guys had stretches where they didn't play well. But trying to change their game or saying they're not Big 10 caliber based on a few games is silly when they spent the 3 previous seasons proving otherwise.
 

NewJerseyHawk

Heisman
Jan 11, 2007
24,459
38,755
113
If you are making the implication that I have implied......I thought losing Jacob was a huge loss and may have dropped hints that the alleged "chemistry" angle definitely took 2 parties.

I will come out and say it....there is a disconnect between what I think this program's identity is and the leaders of the team. That is a huge problem and I said it or implied it before the season. When shots fall and the crowd is in to the game everything is fine. I counted 4X in the 1st half alone where one of our leaders was in a position to move one step to help dribble penetration. He either watched or moved with his arms and not feet. Our leaders also were absent during the offseason with stength and conditioning.

How about not allowing your man to get past you consistently, which breaks down the defense?? At some point, getting people together for a huddle, isn't as effective as moving your feet and trying to draw a charge.....how about being given the ball and free reign to dribble with your back to the defense and your teammates and calling that as a leader of the offense??

If we are holding everyone to the same standards and accountability, we can have a legitimate and fair discussion about phantom things such as body language and other nonsensical things. It is year 3 for someone asked and who wants to be the Point guard and the most important thing we are referring to is gathering teammates for a huddle after a foul??.....where does playing fundamentally sound basketball, moving the ball and cutting without it, or actually scoring, factor into the equation?? Is the player improving year to year at what he is asked to do??

There are things that are obvious if I just look at a stat sheet....?? Are we talking "intangibles " as the leading indicator or leadership, or are we talking about how much additional work and pressure falls on "0 & 24", playing 4 on 5 on both ends of the court....??
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
NJH....I am with you. I'll bet we are in total agreement and there is a double standard. I think I am even more bearish than you when it comes to him as a player.

I completely disagree about the impact of our leaders in respect to their leadership skills and the percent of possessions they give max effort and strength and conditioning that wasn't done in the offseason. They set the tone for the team as seniors, captains and best players on the team.

BTW...counted 4X in 1st half alone 24 was 1 step away from taking the charge and refused to move his feet. That isn't a minor problem, it is a MAJOR problem.

Let me know if you ever need to seats to a game. If I have an extra I'd love to watch a game with you.
 

whofrewdatmataRU13

All-Conference
Nov 26, 2017
1,814
1,852
113
My buddy who I was sitting with and is a SHU fan was praising that he was our best player on the floor. He's always been one of my favorites through out the years but the first couple games of the season were definitely some WTF moments. Glad he has turned it around.
 

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
26,216
12,477
113
Caleb scoring in double figures is essential for Rutgers to consistently score at least 70 points.Baker and Harper must also score in high double figures because this team isn't getting enough scoring from the bench.
 

Yeah Baby

All-American
Aug 14, 2001
19,261
6,466
0
I was super critical earlier this year but he's giving incredible effort on both sides of the ball. We'd be screwed without him.
No Offense but why be critical in the first place? Happy to read this post but these guys all go through rough patches. It’s never about effort with this guy so I give him more slack than anyone and if I am critical it’s under my breath for any of these guys. I can’t do what they do so I keep my mouth shut.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scarlet83

RUsojo

Heisman
Dec 17, 2010
29,437
28,579
113
I can’t believe we are having posts about people criticizing a player shooting 13% from the floor over what like 6 games who then immediately begin to praise him as he begins to play better as an outrage. It’s why we’re all here lol

Anyway, Caleb being an offensive option for us is huge in our hopes of a .500 season.
 

Yeah Baby

All-American
Aug 14, 2001
19,261
6,466
0
I agree. I will say that some of the blame, for the way Caleb’s early woes hurt us, goes to Pike. He should have directed Caleb to focus on shooting inside the arc until his shooting rhythm was back in sync.

Caleb appears to have done just that in recent games. It took 5 games and going 0-10 from the arc with several air balls before Caleb adjusted and took no 3-point shots at UMass and only two against Clemson (he made one of those).

In the last three games Caleb is 2-6 on treys, and it’s worth noting that he had 0 attempts from behind the arc against Purdue.

Clearly we need Caleb to do his thing — defend, steal, rebound, assist and score, but his scoring from beyond the arc is best when coming from limited attempts (0, 1, or 2 per game).
Telling a player not to shoot is the worst thing Pike can do. He was wide open and he needs to take those shots. His Defense is so good he has to be on the court but he can’t be a liability in Offense either.

For team chemistry you need guys like Mag and Caleb to do what they do so other guys can focus on what they do. The chemistry worked very well against Clemson and Purdue and that’s because Mag and Caleb scored as well as their great D. Miller needs to take that step Offensively to play more. Jones needs to just get comfortable out there on both ends of the court. They will both develop and one will score more but the other will keep us in games with his D.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scarlet83

Yeah Baby

All-American
Aug 14, 2001
19,261
6,466
0
I can’t believe we are having posts about people criticizing a player shooting 13% from the floor over what like 6 games who then immediately begin to praise him as he begins to play better as an outrage. It’s why we’re all here lol

Anyway, Caleb being an offensive option for us is huge in our hopes of a .500 season.
Saying he needs to shoot better is fine. What I read on this board was moronic. You can’t defend stupidity.
 

Degaz-RU

Heisman
Dec 19, 2002
22,374
26,673
88
Yeah, Caleb is a key "X Factor" on this team. When he's able to be a third option as a scorer, it really takes pressure off of Harper and Baker, but when he doesn't score, it's sometimes like playing 4 on 5 on offense, as his "bad nights" are often REALLY bad.

Really happy that Caleb seems to have gained confidence and is playing well now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Night Man

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
17,110
15,541
72
Telling a player not to shoot is the worst thing Pike can do. He was wide open and he needs to take those shots. His Defense is so good he has to be on the court but he can’t be a liability in Offense either.

For team chemistry you need guys like Mag and Caleb to do what they do so other guys can focus on what they do. The chemistry worked very well against Clemson and Purdue and that’s because Mag and Caleb scored as well as their great D. Miller needs to take that step Offensively to play more. Jones needs to just get comfortable out there on both ends of the court. They will both develop and one will score more but the other will keep us in games with his D.
I’m in the camp that every good open look should be taken, so we agree there. But it was obvious by the second game that something was wrong with Caleb’s shot from deep (deep twos as well as threes). So my suggestion was related to having him play to his strengths.

For example, Cliff has a good shooting form. I’m willing to bet that if he took 2 or 3 shots from deep, he’d make at least one (it would also help to pull the opposing big man out to create space for our offense to maneuver).

So why doesn’t Cliff take a couple of treys per game? Many would say that’s not playing to his strength. If he missed his first 10 in a row we’d all be saying he shouldn’t be taking those shots. That’s all I meant with Caleb in those early games. But that’s hopefully all behind us now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yeah Baby

RUonBrain

All-American
Apr 29, 2002
8,095
7,531
113
BTW...counted 4X in 1st half alone 24 was 1 step away from taking the charge and refused to move his feet. That isn't a minor problem, it is a MAJOR problem.

Does anyone have stats on how many charges everyone on our team has drawn this season?

Does ANYONE even TRY to take a charge?

Eugene was elite at it. (Maybe he tried too often).

Taking a charge demonstrates toughness.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,330
12,643
78
I can’t believe we are having posts about people criticizing a player shooting 13% from the floor over what like 6 games who then immediately begin to praise him as he begins to play better as an outrage. It’s why we’re all here lol

Anyway, Caleb being an offensive option for us is huge in our hopes of a .500 season.
The difference between him and the guys given shorter leashes is that even at his worst offensive point he was still bringing value on the defensive end which is why Pike continued to play him. He’s easily this team’s best defensive player. Defense is always important, but the absence of your best defender tends to have a bigger impact when the other guys on the team aren’t that good on defense.