AU are essentially rejoicing via Twitter

Mar 24, 2008
84
0
0
that Newton admitted to everything but didn't implicate AU in any wrong doing. Is there any chance they and Cecil didn't know that shopping your kid makes him ineligible?
 

MissStFan87

Redshirt
Feb 15, 2007
1,367
0
0
they think since Cecil claims Cameron didn't know, that it's all good. I guess that quote from the NCAA earlier this week means nothing to them.
 

Dawgzilla

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
5,406
0
0
I know an NCAA rep said just yesterday that requesting a benefit is a violation, but she didn't cite any specific rule. I was under the impression a request alone was not a violation...otherwise the question remains why did MSU keep recruiting Cam Newton after the request was made?

Don Jackson (yes, I know he's a douchebag, but he has more experience in NCAA compliance than anyone else posting on this board) says he has NEVER heard of a request alone costing a player his eligiblity. It is evidence that benefits were given out, but it typically is not a violation on its own.

I heard another NCAA expert -- I think it was on Fox, but I cannot find a link -- who said that the NCAA considers the circumstances surrounding the request, and one factor is the amount of the benefit requested. I think $180,000 is probably off the charts, but then you have the mitigating factor of Cecil doing this allegedly without Cam's knowledge.

In short, I think there is some question whether Cam is automatically ineligible, and if Auburn was clearly without knowledge then I don't think they will forfeit any games.
 

dudehead

Senior
Jul 9, 2006
1,518
580
113
Do you think Rogers (or even Newton, Sr.) is an "agent" that nullifies Newton's amateur certification? I think the "for compensation" issue could be key.

12.3.1 General Rule. An individual shall be ineligible for participation in an intercollegiate sport if he or she
ever has agreed (orally or in writing) to be represented by an agent for the purpose of marketing his or her athletics
ability or reputation in that sport. Further, an agency contract not specifically limited in writing to a sport or
particular sports shall be deemed applicable to all sports, and the individual shall be ineligible to participate in
any sport.


12.3.3 Athletics Scholarship Agent. Any individual, agency or organization that represents a prospective
student-athlete for compensation in placing the prospective student-athlete in a collegiate institution as a recipient
of institutional financial aid shall be considered an agent or organization marketing the individual’s athletics
ability or reputation.

12.3.3.1 Talent Evaluation Services and Agents. A prospective student-athlete may allow a scouting service
or agent to distribute personal information (e.g., high school academic and athletics records, physical statistics)
to member institutions without jeopardizing his or her eligibility, provided the fee paid to such an agent
is not based on placing the prospective student-athlete in a collegiate institution as a recipient of institutional
financial aid.
 

whistlerdog

Redshirt
Jul 27, 2008
138
0
0
and will notbe shocked if they play Cam tomorrow. While the solicitation may be against NCAA rules we dont know what the effect is.I suspect that a solicitation without payment may not result in automatic ineligibility.

There was no reason for Cecil to make the statement tonight except to get out that no benefits were paid, Cam did not know about the "discussions" and Auburn didnt know about it. Most likely was done so Auburn can continue to play him based on the argument that there is no precedent for the NCAA ruling a single solicitation or "discussion" of extra benefits results in ineligibility especially when the school he is at was not involved. If I recall, Cecil said there were discussions about money but didnt say he solicited money - Im sure the statement was very carefully crafted by Auburn lawyers who want Cam to continue to play and Auburn not to have to forfeit games etc.

At this point they may think theyshould continue playing him and if later ruled ineligible appeal on the basis of no previous precedent, not directly involved, no knowledge etc.
 

Dawgzilla

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
5,406
0
0
I actually heard another NCAA representative comment very briefly on this. The definition of "agent" is very loose, and the NCAA does not require that the agent be paid. So, if the NCAA were willing to look at Rogers' actions as "marketing the athletic ability" of Cam Newton, then there could be a violation. I have no idea if the NCAA would stretch things that far, though
 

He Hate Me WDE

Redshirt
Nov 12, 2010
1
0
0
MissStFan87 said:
they think since Cecil claims Cameron didn't know, that it's all good. I guess that quote from the NCAA earlier this week means nothing to them.

Cameron Newton is not bigger than Auburn University. At this point I don't really care if Cameron is found inelgibleor not. As long as the school I love isn't implicated in the matter and isn't put on probation, or worse as a lot of you are hoping for, I can handle one man and his son being an a**
 

Frexzell

Redshirt
Nov 11, 2007
247
0
0
.... because Cecil Newton's statement is EXACTLY what MSU has been saying all along: Cecil sought money, we said no, and we informed the SEC. That is it; nothing about AU or Cam, and because of that, the AU fanbase and Alabama media went crazy. Now, they are rejoicing. We have been consistent from the beginning. It is the AU reaction that has been all over the map.
 

AssEndDawg

Freshman
Aug 1, 2007
3,183
54
48
Frexzell said:
.... because Cecil Newton's statement is EXACTLY what MSU has been saying all along: Cecil sought money, we said no, and we informed the SEC. That is it; nothing about AU or Cam, and because of that, the AU fanbase and Alabama media went crazy. Now, they are rejoicing. We have been consistent from the beginning. It is the AU reaction that has been all over the map.
Auburn actually made this thing worse in the media because of their reactions or lack thereof. If they had come out in the very beginning and said, "Look, we don't know what all is going on but we are cooperating with the NCAA investigation. Right now we are being told that Cam Newton is eligible to play and we don't want to punish him for issues that may or may not affect his eligibility." I think the entire world would have simmered down just a bit. But all those bastards attacking us for following the rules just made the leaks compound.