BACATOLOGY: 3/11 NCAA Tournament Analysis***Rutgers 95% in***

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
85,347
82,848
113
FWIW, The Athletic article this morning has #11 playing #6 TCU in Denver, and the winner playing Grand Canyon/Gonzaga.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

tfio

All-American
Dec 10, 2015
3,815
5,588
113
Hope the OSU game kicks in as a tiebreaker
Yeah I hope that, all our close losses, and the way we played in the BTT are all taken into consideration by the committee. If so, I think we avoid Dayton
 

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
Fwiw we're back to third team in, a hair of Pittsburgh on average seed but, again, way ahead on number of brackets that include us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,042
17,661
97
We’re safely in, imo. Not even listed as “on the bubble” during ESPN’s latest segment

It’s just a matter now of Dayton or no Dayton
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

mugrat86

All-American
Dec 11, 2014
7,366
9,634
82
The biggest issue with quadrants etc is that a 1 point loss to Seton Hall (78 NET) gets thrown in the "bad loss" pile but a 31 point neutral site loss to Michigan (62 NET) is a don't-worry-about-it Q2 loss
IMO the only WTF loss we had was against Minnesota and that was by a point on a last second shot. Temple without 2 starters who beat #1 team in country, Seton Hall which is rivalry game and Nebraska is a tournament team in ACC. I will also add that both of our games against Ohio St were when they had Key and playing great
 

Jtg=04131996

All-Conference
Aug 2, 2010
8,165
4,878
81
Hope/think the OSU “tiebreaker” and solid Net (compared to other bubbles) keeps us out of Dayton.

Numbers saying 1% Dayton is certifiably insane, though. I’m in the ~30% range (that we’re in Dayton) personally
 

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,042
17,661
97
if you factor in OSU...should be a cakewalk...no?

meaning...if it's a coinflip before OSU...doesnt OSU move us in to the category of being a lock for not going to Dayton? Esp with all bid stealers being done?

No. The OSU game doesn’t eliminate our losses to Minny, Neby, Seton Hall, Temple, and our not so great play down the stretch. It’s those reasons we’re a possibility for Dayton
 

Degaz-RU

Heisman
Dec 19, 2002
21,330
24,222
88
Does the committee take into account the margin of losses?

Our worst margin of defeat was 13 points (twice), once on the road to MSU (70-57) and once at home to Michigan (58-45). Other than those two games, we’ve lost by the following point margins: 6, 7, 1* (OSU), 2, 9, 11, 6, 9, 10, 1, 12, 5.

I’d venture a guess that all of the other teams on the bubble — and frankly most teams PERIOD — all have losses of 20+ points.

I have to think this is another data point in our favor, however slight.
 

SirScarlet

Heisman
Jun 27, 2001
26,446
42,380
113
No. The OSU game doesn’t eliminate our losses to Minny, Neby, Seton Hall, Temple, and our not so great play down the stretch. It’s those reasons we’re a possibility for Dayton
you're jumping around.

when factoring in all those things...we're on the edge...right?

THEN, you factor in OSU...and logic would suggest that moves us comfortably off the edge.

I get we're Rutgers fans...and we expect the worst...but following logic should dictate we're safe. And if we go to Dayton, we would have gotten screwed.
 

Jtg=04131996

All-Conference
Aug 2, 2010
8,165
4,878
81
Does the committee take into account the margin of losses?

Our worst margin of defeat was 13 points (twice), once on the road to MSU (70-57) and once at home to Michigan (58-45). Other than those two games, we’ve lost by the following point margins: 6, 7, 1* (OSU), 2, 9, 11, 6, 9, 10, 1, 12, 5.

I’d venture a guess that all of the other teams on the bubble — and frankly most teams PERIOD — all have losses of 20+ points.

I have to think this is another data point in our favor, however slight.
Definitely a factor, who knows how much. Also already factored in by our solid Net
 

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,042
17,661
97
you're jumping around.

when factoring in all those things...we're on the edge...right?

THEN, you factor in OSU...and logic would suggest that moves us comfortably off the edge.

I get we're Rutgers fans...and we expect the worst...but following logic should dictate we're safe. And if we go to Dayton, we would have gotten screwed.

Factoring in what happened at OSU isn’t gonna move the needle that much. They’re a non Tourny team that even if taken into account, we beat by 1. Not a huge difference maker imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUsojo

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
The biggest issue with quadrants etc is that a 1 point loss to Seton Hall (78 NET) gets thrown in the "bad loss" pile but a 31 point neutral site loss to Michigan (62 NET) is a don't-worry-about-it Q2 loss
There is also an assumption that losing to the #119 team is basically exactly the same as losing to #120. Well, Temple also beat Houston and Villanova. How many other teams ranked next to them had that ceiling?

Is losing to Temple like losing to Cal State Fullerton? Rating says yes.
 

RutgersClassof2004

All-Conference
Feb 23, 2020
3,055
2,794
113
I think our hopes of a 10 are out. 9 teams from BIG is a lot, and with PSU's run we are clearly 9th team. I hope committee doesn't make example of RU for BIG's poor performance in NCAAs recently and the disasterous Minnesota game. Unlikely, but possible. We are not a lock, though I have us as an 11 No Dayton.
 

tfio

All-American
Dec 10, 2015
3,815
5,588
113
Does the committee take into account the margin of losses?

Our worst margin of defeat was 13 points (twice), once on the road to MSU (70-57) and once at home to Michigan (58-45). Other than those two games, we’ve lost by the following point margins: 6, 7, 1* (OSU), 2, 9, 11, 6, 9, 10, 1, 12, 5.

I’d venture a guess that all of the other teams on the bubble — and frankly most teams PERIOD — all have losses of 20+ points.

I have to think this is another data point in our favor, however slight.
I mean if it’s something we’re looking at on here I would like to assume it’s something they would look at too. And if so, the way a lot of the teams around the bubble got absolutely blown out in their conference tournaments can only help us I would think
 

Degaz-RU

Heisman
Dec 19, 2002
21,330
24,222
88
It wasn’t a win though. The committee isn’t going to count it as a win
But the committee is “considering” the game in its calculus because of the Big Ten’s admission that we should have won. This could very well tip the balance between us ending up in Dayton or ending up with a non-Dayton 10 or more likely 11 seed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg and GSGS

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,042
17,661
97
But the committee is “considering” the game in its calculus because of the Big Ten’s admission that we should have won. This could very well tip the balance between us ending up in Dayton or ending up with a non-Dayton 10 or more likely 11 seed.

It certainly “could”…but again I don’t think it’s gonna make a huge impact. If we do avoid Dayton…that game is probably a huge factor and I’d stand corrected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatsam98

RutgersClassof2004

All-Conference
Feb 23, 2020
3,055
2,794
113
But the committee is “considering” the game in its calculus because of the Big Ten’s admission that we should have won. This could very well tip the balance between us ending up in Dayton or ending up with a non-Dayton 10 or more likely 11 seed.
I agree that Ohio State "win" is what gets us out of Dayton. But it's such a close call, anything can happen. There are legit reasons they could cite as last four out.
 

mugrat86

All-American
Dec 11, 2014
7,366
9,634
82
Does the committee take into account the margin of losses?

Our worst margin of defeat was 13 points (twice), once on the road to MSU (70-57) and once at home to Michigan (58-45). Other than those two games, we’ve lost by the following point margins: 6, 7, 1* (OSU), 2, 9, 11, 6, 9, 10, 1, 12, 5.

I’d venture a guess that all of the other teams on the bubble — and frankly most teams PERIOD — all have losses of 20+ points.

I have to think this is another data point in our favor, however slight.
Yes it does
 

Degaz-RU

Heisman
Dec 19, 2002
21,330
24,222
88
Bac is eerily silent this morning. I’m envisioning him holed up in his basement performing final bacatology calculations.

Death Calculate GIF by jjjjjohn