I agree on all points..RebelBruiser said:And I realize that QBs are the most influential position on the field, but using playoff record as your main talking point when it comes to football is very short-sighted.
It takes a lot more than a QB to win a Super Bowl, or else Jeff Hostetler and Trent Dilfer wouldn't have as many rings as Peyton Manning and Drew Brees.
Was Elway average before he won two titles late in his career? The answer is no. He was always a great QB. He just finally had the right supporting cast around him to give him a chance at a title.
Montana is a great QB, but you can't just use playoff record to measure him against others, and the debate on who is the greatest of all-time is about as clear of an answer as the Jack vs. Tiger debate. In other words, it can't be answered.
By the way, if you go purely on winning percentage as a starter, Tom Brady is better than Joe Montana (97-30 is greater than 117-47). Tom Brady also has a better playoff record than Montana (14-4). So, if that's your measure, then Brady is the greatest ever.
Coach34 said:And I agree that Otto Graham should be considered the best old school QB.
That you for mentioning the great Danny White. #11 is the only number I have worn on any sports team.Predestined said:slightly. People forget Danny White was a very good QB. He could actually be on the list. Marino was better, but by the mid 80s, the Cowboys problems ran much deeper than the QB position.
Rebels7 said:But Marino's biggest enemy was his ego. Just ask Jimmy Johnson.
His refusal to allow for a running game is why he never had a decent RB on his team. Personal opinion. Emmitt Smith would have had about half as many yards as he does had Marino been his QB. and fewer Super Bowls too.
and the fact that there was nevera state named after ronnie lott begs the bigger questTodd4State said:The 49ers were just great, but they were built around Joe Montana and Ronnie Lott.