But it was okay in 2007

EERs 3:16

New member
Oct 17, 2001
73,677
23
0
When George W. Bush was still president, Schumer advocated almost the exact same approach McConnell is planning to pursue. During a speech at a convention of the American Constitution Society in July 2007, Schumer said if any new Supreme Court vacancies opened up, Democrats should not allow Bush the chance to fill it “except in extraordinary circumstances.”

“We should reverse the presumption of confirmation,” Schumer said, according to Politico. “The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito.” During the same speech, Schumer lamented that he hadn’t managed to block Bush’s prior Supreme Court nominations.

Notably, when he made his remarks in 2007, Bush had about seven more months remaining in his presidential term than Obama has remaining in his.




Much like Republicans today, Schumer’s sentiment was clearly based on a fear that another Bush appointment would radically shift the overall makeup of the Court’s ideology.


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/14/f...bush-supreme-court-nominations/#ixzz40BFYofaZ
 

Mntneer

New member
Oct 7, 2001
438,167
196
0
It's real simple. The GOP should wait and see who Obama nominates and go from there. He has his role to play in the nomination and they have their role in voting him up or down. If they block him, won't be the first time the President was blocked, and if Obama doesn't want to miss the chance in appointing one he should do his best to work with the GOP in finding a candidate that they'll have an impossible time saying no too.
 

WVUBRU

New member
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
It's real simple. The GOP should wait and see who Obama nominates and go from there. He has his role to play in the nomination and they have their role in voting him up or down. If they block him, won't be the first time the President was blocked, and if Obama doesn't want to miss the chance in appointing one he should do his best to work with the GOP in finding a candidate that they'll have an impossible time saying no too.
Exactly.

They both have a responsibility per the oath they took. To filibuster it as Cruz is saying is dead wrong. These individuals were elected to do their jobs for the entire term. Can't say "don't appoint someone since you are a lame duck" to a President. It his responsibility to fill the seat. It his the Senate's responsibility to go through the process without ridiculous stall tactics. If Obama nominates a person not qualified, vote against the person and face the repercussions of your actions but the worst thing is not doing the job you were elected to do.