Buy/Sell: We crack the Top 75 in scoring offense next year.

ckDOG

All-American
Dec 11, 2007
9,913
5,645
113
Is the cupboard bare? Or, was the Walrus that bad?

Soft buy for me. Our OL sucks - they are key to any offensive scheme.</p>
 

uscreb

Redshirt
Aug 5, 2008
501
0
0
problem as the QB thing, but Tyson Lee should be better just because he has a year under his belt. Mullen will probably look to use one of your receivers somewhat like Harvin (yeah, yeah, I know Harvin is one of a kind, but it will add a little dimension to the offense). He'll probably start working in a new QB in a dual system by mid-season.

Bottom line is that you will be better, but it take another year for the OL to catch up.
 

msudawg12

Senior
Dec 9, 2008
3,876
630
113
Top 75 is easily reasonable

As for USCreb - Robert Elliot/Arceto Clark = the Percy Harvin attempt?
 

uscreb

Redshirt
Aug 5, 2008
501
0
0
anything that Mullen does to be creative with your athletes will be a huge change from the tunnel vision offense that Croom and McCorvey cooked up. If your line can stay on their blocks for one or two seconds longer next year, you will discover Points Land on a regular basis. If nothing else, just not having so many three-and-outs will be a bonus for your defense in the fourth quarter.
 

Emanonion

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
279
0
0
He has pretty good speed and has that smaller frame. I think he would make a good player for your Harvin/McCluster style guy.
 

USMatFTL

Redshirt
Feb 25, 2008
48
0
0
And what type of spread will it be? hurry-up? If he does as well as Fedora did implementing the spread in his first year, you might all be happily surprised.
 

UpTheMiddlex3Punt

All-Conference
May 28, 2007
17,946
3,908
113
345 ypg gets you in the top 75 this year. That is about 70ypg more than we had. We should be able to easily get 70ypg more next year.
 

TBonewannabe

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
1,262
0
0
I would buy. I think Mullen is definitely going to bring our streak of no 40 point games to an end. Bye bye Croom coast offense.