engie said:If I am choosing in order of need:
1) Liggins
2) Liggins
3) Liggins
4) the other 3 equally
Taking a hs qb doesn't really even fix our qb depth problem....because it's likely Dan redshirts them, and thus we still only have 2 until the emergency hits. By taking one and only one every year, we almost can't ever afford any transfers at the qb position....
It's called playing him and not redshirting him if we absolutely had to because of injuries. If that happened, the remainder of the season wouldn't be pretty I can tell you that. Having three scholly QBs is just for an emergency to have someone capable to go to. Capable is relative tho, it doesn't mean anywhere near as good as the starter or second string. I don't care which program you're talking about, if you're down to your third QB, scholly or no scholly, your team is 17'd 99.9% of the time. <div>lars larson said:engie said:If I am choosing in order of need:
1) Liggins
2) Liggins
3) Liggins
4) the other 3 equally
Taking a hs qb doesn't really even fix our qb depth problem....because it's likely Dan redshirts them, and thus we still only have 2 until the emergency hits. By taking one and only one every year, we almost can't ever afford any transfers at the qb position....