Chad Voytik-Pittsburgh QB-Grad Transfer lists UK as possible

HalHR2500

All-Conference
Jan 28, 2002
2,537
3,591
0
UK along with Indiana, Memphis and Vanderbilt were listed as possible transfer destinations. He was the starting PITT QB in 2014 and put up decent stats: 60% completion rate, 16 TD's and 2200 yards and rushed for 466 yards and 3 TD's

In 2015 Pitt hired former Tennessee OC Jim Cheney who brought with him his former QB recruit Nate Peterman who "won the open competition" in the summer and was PITT QB this year.

Maybe a name to keep an eye on.....He is from Cleveland TN and was recruited by Vandy and Memphis out of High School.

New QB coach Darin Hinshaw is familiar with him from him time at UT.

I think it's pretty obvious the staff knows Barker needs some QB competition or a capable backup. Either a JUCO or Grad Transfer seems imminent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TJS4UK and jauk11

Rhavic

Heisman
Dec 15, 2014
33,219
23,089
68
I'd really like to see this. Where did you see this though?
 

TJS4UK

Junior
Jun 27, 2002
6,789
281
83
In 2014, he threw 16 TD's & 7 Int's with only 1 Int coming in the final 6 games. 4.3 yards per carry. Former 5.9 4 star. Hmm...
 

TJS4UK

Junior
Jun 27, 2002
6,789
281
83
I guess the only negatives that I see...

1) Only eligible for 1 year.

2) An article says that he won't graduate until April, so he'd miss spring practice.
 
Sep 10, 2015
368
193
0
If he would join the program the staff should take him and still take the JuCo QB Johnson. Even with only one year remaining that is all you would need from him to make it possible to Redshirt Gunnar Hoak. Also it would give you 3 D-1 caliber QBs. It also can't hurt that he would automatically have the most experience against D-1 talent.

To anyone that thinks having good back up QBs isn't important. Just ask the Dallas Cowboys how important it is.
 

akaukswoosh

Hall of Famer
Jan 14, 2006
78,884
120,395
93
To me, that is the very best part. He'd almost be a shoe in to start, IMHO.
He'd realize it if he gives UK serious consideration.

Trent DilferVerified account ‏@TDESPN Jan 4
Fired up to see where graduate transfer QB Chad Voytik ends up at. Absolute thermostat leader, fierce competitor. Good luck!
#Elite11
 

akaukswoosh

Hall of Famer
Jan 14, 2006
78,884
120,395
93
UK along with Indiana, Memphis and Vanderbilt were listed as possible transfer destinations. He was the starting PITT QB in 2014 and put up decent stats: 60% completion rate, 16 TD's and 2200 yards and rushed for 466 yards and 3 TD's

In 2015 Pitt hired former Tennessee OC Jim Cheney who brought with him his former QB recruit Nate Peterman who "won the open competition" in the summer and was PITT QB this year.

Maybe a name to keep an eye on.....He is from Cleveland TN and was recruited by Vandy and Memphis out of High School.

New QB coach Darin Hinshaw is familiar with him from him time at UT.

I think it's pretty obvious the staff knows Barker needs some QB competition or a capable backup. Either a JUCO or Grad Transfer seems imminent.
TV interview
http://www.wrcbtv.com/story/30913853/chad-voytik-using-grad-transfer-but-wont-rush-decision
 
Jun 11, 2012
15,051
15,723
0
Has UK even contacted him or is this just somebody saying that UK had 2 QBs transfer so maybe he would go there? It would be hard to come in the fall and win the starting job anywhere.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,869
60,196
113
To me, that is the very best part. He'd almost be a shoe in to start, IMHO.

I do not agree with this. Johnson, Hoak and Barker are likely to learn from Gran all spring. I anticipate Barker or Johnson being the starter even if this transfer takes place.
 

Mr Schwump

Heisman
Nov 4, 2006
29,563
23,097
18
I guess the only negatives that I see...

1) Only eligible for 1 year.

2) An article says that he won't graduate until April, so he'd miss spring practice.

Biggest negative is he lost his starter role to Peterman.
 

Rhavic

Heisman
Dec 15, 2014
33,219
23,089
68
Biggest negative is he lost his starter role to Peterman.

OP implied that Voytik losing his starting role was a product of bias towards the recruit from the OC when they both arrived at Pitt.
 

TJS4UK

Junior
Jun 27, 2002
6,789
281
83
Biggest negative is he lost his starter role to Peterman.

Yes, it could be. But, it sounds like that competition might have been stacked against him, at least somewhat. He said that he thinks that it was possible as he looks back. Sour grapes or the truth?

IDK about the competition & none of us do, but things like that do happen.
 

TJS4UK

Junior
Jun 27, 2002
6,789
281
83
I do not agree with this. Johnson, Hoak and Barker are likely to learn from Gran all spring. I anticipate Barker or Johnson being the starter even if this transfer takes place.

We will have to agree to disagree. This kid put up some very solid numbers, both running & throwing, against the ACC, 2 years ago. He should only be better now, as he has matured. IMHO, it would be an upset if he got beat out. The biggest thing stacked against him is missing spring practice & that certainly would be a plus for Johnson & Barker. Only time will tell & he may not even come to UK.
 

BoulderCat_rivals187983

All-Conference
May 22, 2002
7,871
3,227
0
Wow, this whole 5th year, grad transfer has become a big deal in college sports hasn't it. Interesting possibility. No doubt we need a viable backup, and someone to provide Barker with some true competition. Competing for a starting job is a big part of college football, and as we know it makes everyone better. UK needs to get to the point we have that at every position. That's the way it is at all of the high profile, elite programs, and some of us refuse to give up on the dream that it could be the way it is in Lexington.
 

Grumpyolddawg

Heisman
Jun 11, 2001
28,364
37,096
113
Wow, this whole 5th year, grad transfer has become a big deal in college sports hasn't it. Interesting possibility. No doubt we need a viable backup, and someone to provide Barker with some true competition. Competing for a starting job is a big part of college football, and as we know it makes everyone better. UK needs to get to the point we have that at every position. That's the way it is at all of the high profile, elite programs, and some of us refuse to give up on the dream that it could be the way it is in Lexington.

Yes it has and even though we brought one in last year I don't like it. Was only 1 ever year or 2, now its pratically double digits every year.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,869
60,196
113
I think it is imminently fair. Kid graduates, but has eligibility left, another school agrees to offer a scholly for that eligibility so the kid can attend grad school. The only problem with the rule is they ridiculously require the kid to find an area of study not offered at their original college. That is a joke! Shame on fans and coaches who want to eliminate this rule.
 

bthaunert

Heisman
Apr 4, 2007
29,518
21,619
0
Has UK even contacted him or is this just somebody saying that UK had 2 QBs transfer so maybe he would go there? It would be hard to come in the fall and win the starting job anywhere.
Teams are not allowed to contact him. He must reach out to the school. My feeling is he probably looked at the landscape of football, saw the UK had a possible starting position open and contacted us.
 
Jun 11, 2012
15,051
15,723
0
He seems like an avg QB. He would only be here for 1 year. He will take practice and possibly some game snaps away from other guys that will be here the year after. Unless he's a great QB I think you pass on him. It could also cause some locker room issues as well. If Johnson doesn't commit, then maybe he's a take.
 

bthaunert

Heisman
Apr 4, 2007
29,518
21,619
0
I don't like that part of the rule either. It should be enough that they have graduated with a 4 year degree.
I agree with both of you. In many cases, the transfer is actually interested in pursuing a masters degree and knows they have no shot at the NFL, but if they want to get an MBA, they can't because their original school offers that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beatle Bum

The_Godfather_rivals

All-Conference
May 22, 2002
25,432
3,795
0
UK needs a viable quarterback, not just a viable backup.

If a dude like this is willing to come to UK in order to compete for the starting job, you'd be a fool not to allow that.

However, would a 5th year guy actually transfer to a place where he isn't all but guaranteed the job? I seriously doubt it and this kid just isn't someone that would get that from UK unless Barker was gone as well.
 

HalHR2500

All-Conference
Jan 28, 2002
2,537
3,591
0
I don't think it's a lock that Barker is the starting QB next year, his off the field and maturity issues are a real concern. UK cant put all of their eggs in Barker's basket, that would be stupid.
 

Goingfor9

All-Conference
Jan 27, 2003
15,194
1,486
113
Go to win now. This guy may bring the experience we need at the spot to be a difference maker. You fools saying let the young guys develop: hogwash! We as fans need a win now mentality. Nothing will change until we hold folks to higher standard
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ridgecat78

Poetax

Heisman
Apr 4, 2002
29,410
20,887
0
Go to win now. This guy may bring the experience we need at the spot to be a difference maker. You fools saying let the young guys develop: hogwash! We as fans need a win now mentality. Nothing will change until we hold folks to higher standard

Fan's Lives Matter.
 

Rhavic

Heisman
Dec 15, 2014
33,219
23,089
68
Go to win now. This guy may bring the experience we need at the spot to be a difference maker. You fools saying let the young guys develop: hogwash! We as fans need a win now mentality. Nothing will change until we hold folks to higher standard

Wut?
 

vhcat70

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
57,418
38,482
0
Another thing: Where is UK going to get an opening for a 3rd QB scholarship slot - Hoak & Johnson already - in this class with pressing needs elsewhere?
 

Los Gatos

Senior
Aug 12, 2003
1,522
813
63
Another thing: Where is UK going to get an opening for a 3rd QB scholarship slot - Hoak & Johnson already - in this class with pressing needs elsewhere?

My guess is we will sign 28 this year. Currently at 22/23 depending on what Smith does today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Schwump

Mr Schwump

Heisman
Nov 4, 2006
29,563
23,097
18
My guess is we will sign 28 this year. Currently at 22/23 depending on what Smith does today.

Re Smith....I posted elsewhere that another site is reporting there's a mistake on his credits and he won't be committing/reporting early.
 

BoulderCat_rivals187983

All-Conference
May 22, 2002
7,871
3,227
0
Yes it has and even though we brought one in last year I don't like it. Was only 1 ever year or 2, now its pratically double digits every year.

Didn't work out too well for Oregon this year did it? Still ACC to SEC wouldn't be as big a jump as from E. Wash. to the Pac 12. I think it probably works best when a guy say goes from Georgia to a Mountain West program like CSU. I'm hopeful the young man from UGa who's decided to come out to Fort Collins, and be paired again with his old OC might make a difference for the Rams. At the very least he'll provide that competition to the returning junior starter who did improve the last part of the season as the Rams won their last 4 to get bowl eligible. BTW I think CSU made another excellent hire in Bobo. Hopefully he works out as well as McElwain did.
 

bthaunert

Heisman
Apr 4, 2007
29,518
21,619
0
Didn't work out too well for Oregon this year did it? Still ACC to SEC wouldn't be as big a jump as from E. Wash. to the Pac 12. I think it probably works best when a guy say goes from Georgia to a Mountain West program like CSU. I'm hopeful the young man from UGa who's decided to come out to Fort Collins, and be paired again with his old OC might make a difference for the Rams. At the very least he'll provide that competition to the returning junior starter who did improve the last part of the season as the Rams won their last 4 to get bowl eligible. BTW I think CSU made another excellent hire in Bobo. Hopefully he works out as well as McElwain did.
It worked out very well for Oregon this year. They lost 4 games, all of which VAJ had a broken finger, did not play or left in the first half due to injury. Had Adams not played, they would not have even gone to a bowl game.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,869
60,196
113
Re Smith....I posted elsewhere that another site is reporting there's a mistake on his credits and he won't be committing/reporting early.

He needs to tell our staff, then, whether he is coming to UK. If he burns a spot and signs with USCjr, that will be ugly.