Cliff notes from TigerDroppings...

dawgstudent

Heisman
Apr 15, 2003
39,341
18,674
113
<font class="PostDisplay">Here is the cliff notes without the background
information on the parties involved. Most of this is speculation based
on what we know and/or believe to be true.

1. Cecil Newton shops Cam to MSU. MSU doesn't pay and reports it to the SEC office. Cecil continues shopping Cam.

2.
Slive/SEC request information from the AU AD/Compliance people. They
reply that they didn't find anything. The power brokers at Auburn have
played this game before (as learned from all the background links) and
knew what to say to the SEC to attempt the clean sweep under the rug.
Chizik, after all, was hired just to enable these guys to do just what
is being alleged. Cam AND other players sign on and gives AU arguably
their best recruiting class ever. This is with a less than stellar head
coach reputation wise that went 7-5 the year before and 5-19 before
that.

3. SEC/Slive accepts this answer because it is better if
nothing comes of it and much easier than taking it seriously; especially
considering AU was expected to win 7-9 games at best before the season.
The barn going undefeated caused this to fester.

4. MSU is
pissed at AU and the SEC. They followed protocol and were basically
ignored on nothing more than AU's word. They were also probably not
happy about the cowbell situation (as stupid as that sounds) and
forwards everything they have to the NCAA directly.

5.
Meanwhile the FBI is working on a seemingly unrelated case involving
Alabama political gaming interests etc. As a side effect of their
surveillance of the key figures (most notably huge AU booster and
Victoryland owner Milton McGregor) they gain intelligence about the pay
to play system currently in place at AU. It is known the FBI got
wiretaps on McGregor. McGregor associates with Dye, Rane, Lowder and
others connected directly to AU on a regular basis. These guys are
caught discussing paying for multiple players and how they were doing it.

6.
The FBI questions the NCAA if they know what is going on down at AU and
suggests to some of this information to them. See, the FBI was
involved from the beginning; they didn't just join the party. This was
not the intent of the FBI's original investigation it was just a bonus
of wiretapping powerful AU boosters. This just kind of fell into their
lap and they passed it along to the NCAA. This is why this case is on
the "fast track"; the NCAA has firm starting point thanks to the FBI.
This is also why both the FBI and NCAA have been simultaneously
interviewing known parties involved as well as some that were not known
previously or haven't been made public yet. They needed to get
testimony and match it up with the wiretap evidence.

7. The
NCAA privately contact and SLAM Slive and company at the SEC for trying
to sweep this under the rug (because that is how it looks to the NCAA).
This is why Slive was so defensive and angry at the parties involved
and felt like they didn't get the same information as the NCAA. Slive
and the SEC did have SOME information though and chose to sit on it. Big
mistake. Slive and the SEC will try to save face, but they are going
to take a major hit once this is over.

8. Last Thursday: The
powers that be at AU got a glimpse of the wiretaps and know they are in
deep shite. They know they're done and that it is just a matter of
time before it hits the fan. They go all in for real and decide to play
Cam to go out in what one insider was reported of saying, "a blaze of
glory"

9. Future: There is probably more to come this week, but
a little farther on the horizon: Once the interviewers start making the
rounds inside the power brokers at AU, the rats will come out and they
will cannibalize each other in testimony not knowing exactly what the
FBI/NCAA has and does not have on wiretap.

I numbered
these so you guys could easily reference it and submit fixes/changes you
think should be made. I will update if it seems reasonable. Also, if
someone will dredge the thread for the background links I will include
them.</font>
 

dawgstudent

Heisman
Apr 15, 2003
39,341
18,674
113
<font class="PostDisplay">Here is the cliff notes without the background
information on the parties involved. Most of this is speculation based
on what we know and/or believe to be true.

1. Cecil Newton shops Cam to MSU. MSU doesn't pay and reports it to the SEC office. Cecil continues shopping Cam.

2.
Slive/SEC request information from the AU AD/Compliance people. They
reply that they didn't find anything. The power brokers at Auburn have
played this game before (as learned from all the background links) and
knew what to say to the SEC to attempt the clean sweep under the rug.
Chizik, after all, was hired just to enable these guys to do just what
is being alleged. Cam AND other players sign on and gives AU arguably
their best recruiting class ever. This is with a less than stellar head
coach reputation wise that went 7-5 the year before and 5-19 before
that.

3. SEC/Slive accepts this answer because it is better if
nothing comes of it and much easier than taking it seriously; especially
considering AU was expected to win 7-9 games at best before the season.
The barn going undefeated caused this to fester.

4. MSU is
pissed at AU and the SEC. They followed protocol and were basically
ignored on nothing more than AU's word. They were also probably not
happy about the cowbell situation (as stupid as that sounds) and
forwards everything they have to the NCAA directly.

5.
Meanwhile the FBI is working on a seemingly unrelated case involving
Alabama political gaming interests etc. As a side effect of their
surveillance of the key figures (most notably huge AU booster and
Victoryland owner Milton McGregor) they gain intelligence about the pay
to play system currently in place at AU. It is known the FBI got
wiretaps on McGregor. McGregor associates with Dye, Rane, Lowder and
others connected directly to AU on a regular basis. These guys are
caught discussing paying for multiple players and how they were doing it.

6.
The FBI questions the NCAA if they know what is going on down at AU and
suggests to some of this information to them. See, the FBI was
involved from the beginning; they didn't just join the party. This was
not the intent of the FBI's original investigation it was just a bonus
of wiretapping powerful AU boosters. This just kind of fell into their
lap and they passed it along to the NCAA. This is why this case is on
the "fast track"; the NCAA has firm starting point thanks to the FBI.
This is also why both the FBI and NCAA have been simultaneously
interviewing known parties involved as well as some that were not known
previously or haven't been made public yet. They needed to get
testimony and match it up with the wiretap evidence.

7. The
NCAA privately contact and SLAM Slive and company at the SEC for trying
to sweep this under the rug (because that is how it looks to the NCAA).
This is why Slive was so defensive and angry at the parties involved
and felt like they didn't get the same information as the NCAA. Slive
and the SEC did have SOME information though and chose to sit on it. Big
mistake. Slive and the SEC will try to save face, but they are going
to take a major hit once this is over.

8. Last Thursday: The
powers that be at AU got a glimpse of the wiretaps and know they are in
deep shite. They know they're done and that it is just a matter of
time before it hits the fan. They go all in for real and decide to play
Cam to go out in what one insider was reported of saying, "a blaze of
glory"

9. Future: There is probably more to come this week, but
a little farther on the horizon: Once the interviewers start making the
rounds inside the power brokers at AU, the rats will come out and they
will cannibalize each other in testimony not knowing exactly what the
FBI/NCAA has and does not have on wiretap.

I numbered
these so you guys could easily reference it and submit fixes/changes you
think should be made. I will update if it seems reasonable. Also, if
someone will dredge the thread for the background links I will include
them.</font>
 

therightway

Redshirt
Aug 26, 2009
1,801
0
0
If the FBI told the NCAA that there was smoke. The NCAA would advise Auburn not to play Newton. Auburn could not have been that bone headed to continue to play him.
 

Shmuley

Heisman
Mar 6, 2008
23,739
10,378
113
that they had nothing to lose by playing him, so they played him even after the NCAA warned them not to do so.
 

NorthMsDawg

Redshirt
Mar 4, 2009
501
0
0
 

o_1984Dawg

Redshirt
Feb 23, 2008
1,131
3
38
Playing Cam and knowing he might be ineligible is one thing, but the post DS quoted makes it sound like Auburn knows for a fact that they're going down. If they know that, they have to know that they are making it worse. If an elaborate pay for play scheme was uncovered, the Death Penalty, while still unlikely, would at least be on the table. Why the hell would they spit in the NCAA's face at that point? That's a whole new level of stupid.<div>
</div><div>I just don't think playing Newton at this point is about going down in a blaze of glory. They have to think they have a real shot at getting out of all of this.</div>
 

NorCalDawg

Redshirt
Oct 8, 2010
314
3
18
....Jody Wright turning this in at the urging of Alabama based on the events that surfaced yesterday (NCAA visit with Jody Wright). I think that MSU was pissed that the SEC didn't do anything with the information. I also think some of the delay in getting the information to the SEC was the fact that they didn't trust the SEC to do the right thing with the information.
dawgstudent wrote:
<font class="PostDisplay">
4. MSU is
pissed at AU and the SEC. They followed protocol and were basically
ignored on nothing more than AU's word. They were also probably not
happy about the cowbell situation (as stupid as that sounds) and
forwards everything they have to the NCAA directly.
</font>
 

jcdawgman18

Redshirt
Jul 1, 2008
1,379
0
36
ever since they hired Chizik. The limo deal, for example. Plus, you have to remember that Pat Dye, one of the most accomplished cheaters around, is playing a major, major role in their program again these days.
 

gptdawg

Redshirt
Jan 23, 2007
567
0
0
I thought the side story about how Terry Bowden paid players was amazing. It was just like companypayroll. I never heard anything like that before. How did they avoid the death penalty then? I know-they're Auburn. But hell we gave a freaking clothing discount and got hammered.
 

FlabLoser

Redshirt
Aug 20, 2006
10,709
0
0
1984Dawg said:
Playing Cam and knowing he might be ineligible is one thing, but the post DS quoted makes it sound like Auburn knows for a fact that they're going down. If they know that, they have to know that they are making it worse. If an elaborate pay for play scheme was uncovered, the Death Penalty, while still unlikely, would at least be on the table. Why the hell would they spit in the NCAA's face at that point?
I've changed my opinion on this. Now I think Auburn knows its in such bad trouble, that playing Cam a few more games isn't going to make things measurably worse. Either they're already slated for the death penalty, or they think playing 3 more games isn't serious enough to pile the death penalty on top of what else is coming.

Even if they bench Cam, the sanctions coming are going to have them so punch drunk that playing Cam a few games might not have been a big deal...provided that it wouldn't trigger the death penalty.

So yeah, blaze of glory.
 

coach66

Junior
Mar 5, 2009
12,679
289
83
student that asked for it. I got it myself as the store owner was a fraternity brothers father. That probation was one of the great injustices on the NCAA all time along with the last Jackie episode. So severe for so little crime.
 

ckDOG

All-American
Dec 11, 2007
9,837
5,509
113
you have to think that such corruption would lead to AU losing their accreditation (this goes beyond athletics). If they lose their accreditation, they essentially lose their athletics program. If that were inevitable, might as well go down in a blaze of glory because AU football is toast.

That could only be true if, as of last week, the NCAA only knew enough to "recommend" that Newton sits while AU people knew about the forthcoming ****-storm that many allege is going to happen. It certainly is possible that the NCAA is piecing this together now and is picking up on things as the FBI gets further into their own (larger) investigation. As of last week the NCAA may have in the position where they knew it was likely enough evidence would be uncovered to comfortably say he's ineligible, but didn't have it at the time to take a firm stance. Otherwise, the NCAA would have just said "he can't play" and released that to the media.

Of course, all of what I just said is likely pure garbage with less than a percent chance of it being true. It makes for great speculation though!
 

gptdawg

Redshirt
Jan 23, 2007
567
0
0
Furthermore, who was behind both of our recent probations? @%*@. Speaking of tainted reputations-did it hurt them?
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,068
25,108
113
I can't imagine that the FBI would have gone to the NCAA with anything it found re: any violations. Also, there's no way Auburn played Newton if they were advised not to by the NCAA.
 

RougeDawg

Redshirt
Jul 12, 2010
1,474
0
0
Said the cheating that goes on there is incredible and ridiculous at how brazing and open they are with it. Said when Dye came back he picked up as if he'd never been gone and Bowden was basically a puppet. Tubbs gave resistance to the Money Mongrels and was dismissed after a great run at Auburn. He was dismissed because he wouldn't go along with Dye and McGregor's wishes, despite his pretty damn good win/loss record. My source also said that most of these rumors are in fact true, and he's actually surprised they've gone this long without coming to light. It was inevitable and Cam was the straw that broke the CAMel's back.

And why wouldn't the FBI tell the NCAA about infractions? They have a duty to provide facts to all parties involved. If a certain university and it's boosters is under a federal investigation wouldn't the FBI tell that university's governing body?
 

FISHDAWG

Redshirt
Dec 27, 2009
2,077
0
36
AU is kinda like AIG .... a lot of people think they are just to big or important to fail ... I don't see annialization for the program but I'm sure stiff penalties will be handed down.... I also see bama becoming stronger after this .... another beast to deal with
 

Topgundawg

Redshirt
Oct 23, 2010
864
0
0
against Auburn. That doesn't mean there wasn't NCAA violations just criminal. I have to believe they are looking at the connection between the illegal gaming activity in Alabama and if that money is the money being used to fuel pay for play. If those dots don't connect then we may not hear anything. If they connect you can write off the Tigers....
 

MaroonedNdaRock

Redshirt
Nov 9, 2010
610
0
0
And why wouldn't the FBI tell the NCAA about infractions? They have a duty to provide facts to all parties involved.
One possible reason is that if they have subpoened individuals before the grand jury, then that testimonyfalls underRule6(e) and can not be repeated. Also, in general, most US Attorney's Office take a conservattive approach adnconsider anything found during the course of a grand jury investigationto beunder Rule 6(e). Also,Federal law enforcement agencies do not make it a practice toshare their evidence with others outside the US Attorney's office or other Federal LEOs.There might be some individualFBI agent who may run across a NCAA investigatorand share a lead. But the FBI as an agencydoesn't have a duty to tell the NCAA anything.

Now, the FBI could go to the NCAA and subpoena them forrecords pertaining toany NCAAinvestigation involving subjectsof their invesitgation. Or interview NCAA investigators about their investigations. Which at that point, the NCAA investigator could deduce what was being asked and develop his/her own leads.
 

TBonewannabe

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
1,262
0
0
They have been completely 100% behind the stance that Cam is eligible. To change the stance now is admitting guilt. They have to been praying that they luck up or they arescrewed anyway.
 

Maroon Eagle

All-American
May 24, 2006
17,867
7,629
102
...now that's been quiet, which is what you expect from the FBI. I wonder how many "agents" are going to be indicted.
 

JxnDawg39211

Redshirt
Aug 5, 2007
837
0
0
John Gresham story.Yes. Do I think connecting the dots from an ellaboratepay-to-play scheme to the Auburn Board of Trustees and other big time boosters is out of the question? No. It is a little far fetched as of right now, but to think it might not be true is not out of the question

The Terry Bowden interview with Paul Davis, the Ramsey tapes and Pat Dye, Bobby Lowder's bank going under and remaining on the Board of Trustees because of his relationships with Alabama politicians, The YellaWood guy, the University getting a slap in the face probation from SACS, McGregor and his casinas.It all is very interesting and does show thata handful of alumni have hijacked the university and have gone rogue.

Lets face it . Auburn could go from one end of the spectrum and go unscathed and walk from this thing like nothing happened.At the other end of the sepectrum they could lose accredidation from SACS which would ultimately lead to them being kicked out of the SEC. Whats even worse, is none of their students could get into med school, law school , etc because of not being an accredited university .

If youlook at Auburn'spast with Pat Dye and how he conducted his program to the Terry Bowden interview, it is no question in my mind that Auburn has been cheating again. Going from 5-7 in 2008 to 7-5 in 2009 with a coach that went 5-19 at Iowa State does not land you the top high school player in Arkansas (Dyer), the top player in Mississippi (Shon Coleman) , the best JUCO player in the country (Newton), the best DE in Florida (C.Lemonier) along with 4 other 4stars form Alabama. Chizik is a puppett, Trooper Taylor is a bagman , and Auburn is being run by big money alumni who are running the university in the ground, just like he did his bank. </p>

Will they get caught? That is $200,000 question. It all depends on how well they covered their tracks.

</p>