All I'm saying is that if you are going to compare Stansbury's body of work to Heath's then you have to consider the full body, not just the UArk years. Fact is, Heath made it to the Elite Eight, Stans hasn't. Stans has multiple West titles and an overall SEC title, Heath never did. Fact is that Heath is also struggling again in his second year at USF, and struggling badly, but it took him two years to get Arkansas competetive again after Nolan left him with Modica and not much else. Anyway, some people would rather have the tourney run that Heath had, some prefer ruling the West on a year to year basis. I would like some of both. I like winning the West, but I would gladly take a year or two of being in the middle of the pack for a team that was in the Elite Eight once every eight years. I don't think I would take three 4-12 years in that same eight year period though.