. . . I had to deal with Comcast on my dad's 46" Samsung LCD. Having a 47" Vizio and Directv here in Texas, I could compare them.
There was no comparison. The craptacular "HD" that Comcast spews out is terrible. On a 120 Hz Sammy, I saw so much motion blur on Fox and ESPN that it was practically unwatchable. When I got back to Texas, it was so much clearer watching NBC and FOX NFL games on my 60 Hz Vizio and Directv . . . no motion blur at all.<span style="margin-left: -72px; margin-top: -36px; opacity: 0.25;" class="smarterwiki-popup-bubble smarterwiki-popup-bubble-active"><span class="smarterwiki-popup-bubble-body"><span class="smarterwiki-popup-bubble-links smarterwiki-clearfix"><span class="smarterwiki-popup-bubble-links-row smarterwiki-clearfix">
</span></span></span></span>
The only advantage Comcast may have is with a complete bundle package of cable, phone, and HSI. I use the cable company here for phone and internet, but I refuse to compromise TV with Charter out here. Though, honestly, Charter's picture is better than that fester pile that Comcast in Jackson delivers.
I do call the cable company every year to "re-negotiate" my rates phone and internet bundle rates. I probably save $25-$32 off the full price of services by calling once a year.